Anonymous
Post 02/18/2017 10:15     Subject: Re:K Lottery List

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We're not on the Hill, but are also doing the lottery for K and, similarly, trying for schools (WoTP, a few others, and ITS/CMI) that would normally be very difficult to get into for Prek, but seem to have had a few K slots in the last few years.


Because those schools both expanded. They will not have slots like that this year.


i don't think that's correct. There are a few new K spots every year because class size gets bigger.
Anonymous
Post 02/18/2017 01:01     Subject: Re:K Lottery List

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:TR - Young
TR - 4th

We got into TR 4th for PK3 and declined the spot because we didn't think DD was ready for such a large school/classroom setting at 3 years old. No sibling/teacher preference. We decided to wait and try again in K.


I hope you don't regret that.


We'll be ok!
Anonymous
Post 02/18/2017 01:00     Subject: Re:K Lottery List

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:TR - Young
TR - 4th

We got into TR 4th for PK3 and declined the spot because we didn't think DD was ready for such a large school/classroom setting at 3 years old. No sibling/teacher preference. We decided to wait and try again in K.


I hope you don't regret that.


DP. I pulled my 3 year old from PK3 because she was overwhelmed and the class was a terrible fit. You can't torture your 3 year old just to hold a spot for K ...


PP here. I'm with you. It just wasn't the best timing and wasn't a good fit. If we don't get in for K, we have other options. Wont cry about it! Good luck, PP!
Anonymous
Post 02/17/2017 21:01     Subject: Re:K Lottery List

Anonymous wrote:We're not on the Hill, but are also doing the lottery for K and, similarly, trying for schools (WoTP, a few others, and ITS/CMI) that would normally be very difficult to get into for Prek, but seem to have had a few K slots in the last few years.


Because those schools both expanded. They will not have slots like that this year.
Anonymous
Post 02/17/2017 19:05     Subject: Re:K Lottery List

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We're not on the Hill, but are also doing the lottery for K and, similarly, trying for schools (WoTP, a few others, and ITS/CMI) that would normally be very difficult to get into for Prek, but seem to have had a few K slots in the last few years.


You better have some safeties. The chances are astronomically small.


I mean, for K, everyone has a safety.


yep. compulsory education ftw!
Anonymous
Post 02/17/2017 18:31     Subject: Re:K Lottery List

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We're not on the Hill, but are also doing the lottery for K and, similarly, trying for schools (WoTP, a few others, and ITS/CMI) that would normally be very difficult to get into for Prek, but seem to have had a few K slots in the last few years.


You better have some safeties. The chances are astronomically small.


I mean, for K, everyone has a safety.
Anonymous
Post 02/17/2017 18:14     Subject: Re:K Lottery List

Anonymous wrote:We're not on the Hill, but are also doing the lottery for K and, similarly, trying for schools (WoTP, a few others, and ITS/CMI) that would normally be very difficult to get into for Prek, but seem to have had a few K slots in the last few years.


You better have some safeties. The chances are astronomically small.
Anonymous
Post 02/17/2017 17:33     Subject: Re:K Lottery List

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:TR - Young
TR - 4th

We got into TR 4th for PK3 and declined the spot because we didn't think DD was ready for such a large school/classroom setting at 3 years old. No sibling/teacher preference. We decided to wait and try again in K.


I hope you don't regret that.


DP. I pulled my 3 year old from PK3 because she was overwhelmed and the class was a terrible fit. You can't torture your 3 year old just to hold a spot for K ...
Anonymous
Post 02/17/2017 17:28     Subject: Re:K Lottery List

Anonymous wrote:TR - Young
TR - 4th

We got into TR 4th for PK3 and declined the spot because we didn't think DD was ready for such a large school/classroom setting at 3 years old. No sibling/teacher preference. We decided to wait and try again in K.


I hope you don't regret that.
Anonymous
Post 02/17/2017 14:03     Subject: Re:K Lottery List

TR - Young
TR - 4th

We got into TR 4th for PK3 and declined the spot because we didn't think DD was ready for such a large school/classroom setting at 3 years old. No sibling/teacher preference. We decided to wait and try again in K.
Anonymous
Post 02/17/2017 12:12     Subject: K Lottery List

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It's been interesting to see Capital City's fall from grace. Ten years ago, all of the middle class parents coveted a seat there.


Really? I don't remember it that way.


How old is your oldest? NP here but I distinctly remember it being all about Haynes, Cap City, Stokes, Two Rivers and Lamb. I hardly every see or hear Cap City or Haynes being a top pick unless it's someone that lives nearby.
Anonymous
Post 02/17/2017 10:01     Subject: K Lottery List

Anonymous wrote:It's been interesting to see Capital City's fall from grace. Ten years ago, all of the middle class parents coveted a seat there.


Really? I don't remember it that way.
Anonymous
Post 02/17/2017 03:20     Subject: Re:K Lottery List

We're not on the Hill, but are also doing the lottery for K and, similarly, trying for schools (WoTP, a few others, and ITS/CMI) that would normally be very difficult to get into for Prek, but seem to have had a few K slots in the last few years.
Anonymous
Post 02/16/2017 20:12     Subject: K Lottery List

Op, K seems somewhat easier than PK3 for some reason. You have a shot at any of these schools. Last year I put ITS as my top choice for K "knowing" that we wouldnt get in. Well, we got a decent wait list number and were offered a spot the day before school started. We took it and my child is having the most fabulous year. Good luck!
Anonymous
Post 02/16/2017 17:11     Subject: K Lottery List

Anonymous wrote:Be nice, folks, even if PP could have been nicer her/himself


True but it is super funny. Kind of like Trump getting mad at the leaker.