Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, I would start with meeting with your boss to ask about this discrepancy. Is it possible that your boss doesn't know about the difference in salary? I think you just need to be very matter of fact about it - you have the same background, experience, expertise, etc. - and now you are taking on even more responsibility and expect to be compensated accordingly.
Thank you. I am planning to write this email - grateful for comments
Hi abc
I was somewhat surprised to note that xyz's comp package is higher than mine for 2017. [insert details of the comp difference]. Given my background, experience and increased responsibilities, I presume that this was a inadvertent error and can be resolved fairly easily upon review.
If not please let me know who I should speak to in order to resolve this.
I'm not the pp but I think I would broach this subject in person rather than email. Tone doesn't always come across properly in email.
Anonymous wrote:What would you do if they don't adjust your salary to match his? Resign? Accept it and be OK with it?
I think you need to decide this first before sending the email.
Anonymous wrote:Before you send that email you might want to see if he has more education or experience than you. Just because he reports to you doesn't mean that you are more qualified - could be that he turned down the Lead position that you accepted
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:His role and mine are both technical. He covers one aspect of the area that i have overall responsibility for. I am very proficient in the area he covers and am more qualified (both on paper and in real life) and am a high performer in this company.
I am also pretty sure that my predecessor was not paid less than he was but i dont know that comp but i do know his.
I hope you stick up for yourself. Happened to me and I was so thrilled by the promotion that I didn't say anything. Years later I regret.
+1000
And you should email him so that this is documented. From a legal standpoint
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:His role and mine are both technical. He covers one aspect of the area that i have overall responsibility for. I am very proficient in the area he covers and am more qualified (both on paper and in real life) and am a high performer in this company.
I am also pretty sure that my predecessor was not paid less than he was but i dont know that comp but i do know his.
I hope you stick up for yourself. Happened to me and I was so thrilled by the promotion that I didn't say anything. Years later I regret.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:His role and mine are both technical. He covers one aspect of the area that i have overall responsibility for. I am very proficient in the area he covers and am more qualified (both on paper and in real life) and am a high performer in this company.
I am also pretty sure that my predecessor was not paid less than he was but i dont know that comp but i do know his.
I hope you stick up for yourself. Happened to me and I was so thrilled by the promotion that I didn't say anything. Years later I regret.
Anonymous wrote:His role and mine are both technical. He covers one aspect of the area that i have overall responsibility for. I am very proficient in the area he covers and am more qualified (both on paper and in real life) and am a high performer in this company.
I am also pretty sure that my predecessor was not paid less than he was but i dont know that comp but i do know his.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't take too much advice from DCUM. You know your situation better than we do.
I'm going to guess you're in a large organization with an HR department. This gets back to previous discussions about having to provide current compensation information when applying for a new job. Lazy HR departments use current compensation to determine what they will pay new hires. So someone who was already well-paid does even better, and someone who was underpaid continues to be so. That guy probably got a good salary somewhere along the way and it just kept going.
HR departments at large companies often limit what salary increases are allowed, even when someone is promoted or takes a new position. I've seen it happen, and at one of my last employers, the only way to get paid fairly was to leave and go work for a competitor for a while, then my company would hire them back after a year or two at a big salary jump. They'd never avoid this by giving out an appropriate salary in the first place. It was ridiculous. It's one way that women often end up earning less than men for similar work, simply because they started out with less in the first place and it just continues on.
I totally get why you are angry, and wish you luck on rectifying the situation.
Thank you for your thoughtful response. Yes I am at a Fortune 500 company with a large HR department. I think there are a couple of things at play here:
- I dont think they looked at the team members comp but just gave me the lowest increase they thought they could get away with (so not deliberate or at least i dont think so)
- We do have a large and lazy HR dept who does want to lower costs overall especially at my department
- Even though my comp is lower than his it is a relative big increase for me. His overall increase from his 2016 comp is also negligible which is another matter .
- And yes my husband is a high earner which my boss knows
So annoyed!!!
Anonymous wrote:OP, I would start with meeting with your boss to ask about this discrepancy. Is it possible that your boss doesn't know about the difference in salary? I think you just need to be very matter of fact about it - you have the same background, experience, expertise, etc. - and now you are taking on even more responsibility and expect to be compensated accordingly.
Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't take too much advice from DCUM. You know your situation better than we do.
I'm going to guess you're in a large organization with an HR department. This gets back to previous discussions about having to provide current compensation information when applying for a new job. Lazy HR departments use current compensation to determine what they will pay new hires. So someone who was already well-paid does even better, and someone who was underpaid continues to be so. That guy probably got a good salary somewhere along the way and it just kept going.
HR departments at large companies often limit what salary increases are allowed, even when someone is promoted or takes a new position. I've seen it happen, and at one of my last employers, the only way to get paid fairly was to leave and go work for a competitor for a while, then my company would hire them back after a year or two at a big salary jump. They'd never avoid this by giving out an appropriate salary in the first place. It was ridiculous. It's one way that women often end up earning less than men for similar work, simply because they started out with less in the first place and it just continues on.
I totally get why you are angry, and wish you luck on rectifying the situation.