Anonymous wrote:Sorry for typos!
Airbnb takes out its cut and the lodging tax and then pays out the host.
Before Airbnb started this automatic collection of lodging tax I would do it myself and send in to DC, but I always feared it was just going into the pocket of a DC employee. Seems less likely since Airbnb is sending in a big check of all airbnb hosts (I'm sure it's millions of dollars) to DC.
Anonymous wrote:What's next? Death to Uber too?
These politicians don't get innovation.
I'm not opposed to regulations, but if you review the proposal (up to $7,000 in fines, hotel-type inspections, etc).
These are homeowners who are opening their houses to others (not like hotel) but often these folks become friends. It's a completely different model.
It's as simple as this... hotels were losing money because of Airbnb. They put lots of money and lobbying behind destroying Airbnb...
Enter Kenyon McDuffie... problem solved!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The folks I know who Airbnb their homes would not be renting it otherwise. The rooms would S it empty when they are gone for long stretches of time. So instead of the government allowing these folks to rent then and collect millions in taxes for the city, they prevent it and then collect personal gifts from the hotel industry.
This has to be a political play between the hotel industry and McDuffie. Millions of dollars are being diverted from the city so that the hotel industry can supposedly get more bookings (which they won?'T get because the guests are different).
How much did DC collect in occupancy taxes from AirBnB last year? Were all of the AirBnB taxes collected? It's my impression that there are a lot of scofflaws who don't pay taxes on unregulated rentals, which is my major problem with AirBnB.
Anonymous wrote:Lots of Astroturf'd comments in this thread.
Hi, Airbnb (and your local DC PR firm)!
Anonymous wrote:The folks I know who Airbnb their homes would not be renting it otherwise. The rooms would S it empty when they are gone for long stretches of time. So instead of the government allowing these folks to rent then and collect millions in taxes for the city, they prevent it and then collect personal gifts from the hotel industry.
This has to be a political play between the hotel industry and McDuffie. Millions of dollars are being diverted from the city so that the hotel industry can supposedly get more bookings (which they won?'T get because the guests are different).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's next? Death to Uber too?
These politicians don't get innovation.
I'm not opposed to regulations, but if you review the proposal (up to $7,000 in fines, hotel-type inspections, etc).
These are homeowners who are opening their houses to others (not like hotel) but often these folks become friends. It's a completely different model.
It's as simple as this... hotels were losing money because of Airbnb. They put lots of money and lobbying behind destroying Airbnb...
Enter Kenyon McDuffie... problem solved!
The problem is that 50-70%+ of AirBnB bookings are done via professional managers with multiple properties. The situation you described ("opening their houses to others (not like hotel) but often these folks become friends...") is very much in the minority.
The city council has an obligation to the voters to ensure that there is a healthy supply of real estate for full time, tax paying residents. When landlords start pulling units off the market to peddle them as hotel rooms - without the proper zoning and licensing - they are imposing a negative externality on their neighbors and the rest of the city.
So, instead of shutting down the 30% (those are the stats I've seen) of commercial operators, the goal is to shut down (or greatly limit) everyone else???
The folks I know who Airbnb their homes would not be renting it otherwise. The rooms would S it empty when they are gone for long stretches of time. So instead of the government allowing these folks to rent then and collect millions
In taxes for the city, they prevent it and then collect personal gifts from the hotel industry.
This has to be a political play between the hotel industry and McDuffie. Millions of dollars are being diverted from the city so that the hotel industry can supposedly get more bookings (which they won?'T get because the guests are different).
Anonymous wrote:Yes it's my residence. The bill was created by the Hotel industry (and Councilmember McDuffie). They are trying to close down Airbnb in Washington, DC.
Have you read the bill? You can only host 15 days a year while being away and are fined up to $7,000 if you break the very cumbersome rules (e.g. outrageous "hotel-type) inspections that shouldn't be imposed on individuals).
I have multiple rooms in my home that I rent. Under this bill, I can only rent one (whether I am home or not.
Many of my guests who have come for work or were moving to DC and looking for a "community" (not hotel-like) experience stayed with me between 15-30 days. The new bill prevents these stays.
And my mother is sick and lives out of town. Last year, I would go out of town to visit/help her during stays were folks were repeat visitors and have become friends. One woman who was in town on business stayed with me three times. On the third time, I felt very comfortable being gone from the house and she did too. Also not possible with bill.
The bill is far too restrictive. It's intent is to shut down Airbnb. Like I said, it was created by the Hotel industry (and Councilmember) McDuffie. They don't care about the everyday person looking to Airbnb, just protecting their profits.
Very sad.