Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ahahah, she apparently got a "Doctor" to plant a question re: the ACA during this televised town hall, too. You can't make this shit up: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/barbara-comstock-townhall-question_us_58adec9ae4b057efdce88931
OMG - first candidate to ever do that
Hey Barbara, quit having your fake doctor friends call in, and DO YOUR JOB.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[quote=Anonymous]Funny, I got a call from the House and it was for a telephone town hall this evening. You could just listen in on the line and if you had a question, you hit*3. Actually, it was pretty impressive. She talked about repeal and replace, investigating Trump/Putin/Russia stuff, infrastructure, taxes.
I took part in a Comstock Town Hall meeting on Obamacare via phone. There were 6,000 constituents on the line from all parties and walks of life asking questions about Obamacare and when might it go away and what to expect in the meantime and in the future. There were 6,000 - 12,000 callers in and out for over two hours. A lot of voices were heard. It was a very productive call. I think this is the future for Town Halls.
It's well known that the liberals will try to protest and destroy every town hall held by a Rep. during the next few years all to get photos of a protest and riot. Why play that game when you can reach out by conference phone and get 6000 constituents regularly throughout the week on various topics? That makes a lot more sense than for Barbara or other Congressmen to go to a Townhalls and have to face the ugly liberals, their signs and rioting. That's the liberal attack - to use this Congressional recess - as a means to attack the Republican Congressmen and women who might be home. The OP of this thread is one of those working for the liberals: to get the constituents riled up about crying for Town Halls in this district (since we are going into Congressional recess) because the libs then show up with ugly signs, protests, and they film all of that. Barbara is beating OP at her own game by holding the 6,000+ townhalls by phone. Brilliant!
The telephonic Townhalls work better, too, because you can hear everything your Congresswoman is saying, you can beep in to ask questions. You can clearly hear other peoples' comments. You can ask multiple questions. everyone can hear everyone else. It works much better and reaches far more constituents than the old tired Town Hall meeting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:21:15 - do you not understand how this is a problem? We have no idea if she's actually answering constituent questions during these town halls. They are probably ALL plants, and she's claiming this to be "meeting her constituents"
Yeah, no. She needs to show up in public and talk to people. That is her job. She is hiding from us and thinks she can get away with this shit.
She does need to publicly talk with folks. However, it should come as no surprise that she doesn't want to engage with people that will never vote for her and will shout her down and not let her answer questions.
She's acting like a politician. Why are some people surprised?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ahahah, she apparently got a "Doctor" to plant a question re: the ACA during this televised town hall, too. You can't make this shit up: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/barbara-comstock-townhall-question_us_58adec9ae4b057efdce88931
OMG - first candidate to ever do that
Anonymous wrote:21:15 - do you not understand how this is a problem? We have no idea if she's actually answering constituent questions during these town halls. They are probably ALL plants, and she's claiming this to be "meeting her constituents"
Yeah, no. She needs to show up in public and talk to people. That is her job. She is hiding from us and thinks she can get away with this shit.
Anonymous wrote:Ahahah, she apparently got a "Doctor" to plant a question re: the ACA during this televised town hall, too. You can't make this shit up: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/barbara-comstock-townhall-question_us_58adec9ae4b057efdce88931
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:she didn't lose by much last time. I think she's going down in 2018.
Bullshit. She gained even the Langley district by more votes than ever before. Signed - a poll watcher.
NP here:okay, that's fine that she did well in Langley. However, 2014 she won the election by 16 points. In 2016, it was down to 5points.
https://ballotpedia.org/Virginia%27s_10th_Congressional_District_election,_2016
As a DC resident and Democrat, I plan to do whatever I can to make sure she is out.
Including coming here illegally to vote? Not the previous poster but I saw a few of them trying just that at the polls.
No, you didn't.
I'm always amazed at people who think they can tell someone's residency status just by looking at them. Who needs passports or green cards when psychic power will do?
Hint: they're racists!
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:she didn't lose by much last time. I think she's going down in 2018.
Bullshit. She gained even the Langley district by more votes than ever before. Signed - a poll watcher.
NP here:okay, that's fine that she did well in Langley. However, 2014 she won the election by 16 points. In 2016, it was down to 5points.
https://ballotpedia.org/Virginia%27s_10th_Congressional_District_election,_2016
As a DC resident and Democrat, I plan to do whatever I can to make sure she is out.
Including coming here illegally to vote? Not the previous poster but I saw a few of them trying just that at the polls.
No, you didn't.
I'm always amazed at people who think they can tell someone's residency status just by looking at them. Who needs passports or green cards when psychic power will do?
Hint: they're racists!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:she didn't lose by much last time. I think she's going down in 2018.
Bullshit. She gained even the Langley district by more votes than ever before. Signed - a poll watcher.
NP here:okay, that's fine that she did well in Langley. However, 2014 she won the election by 16 points. In 2016, it was down to 5points.
https://ballotpedia.org/Virginia%27s_10th_Congressional_District_election,_2016
As a DC resident and Democrat, I plan to do whatever I can to make sure she is out.
Why? She's not your representative. Why? Because you are mad that Trump lost. So instead of trying to fix your own party, you and the like-minded are trying to force Republican lawmakers to townhalls where you can throw stuff at them, start a dangerous protest, hope it evolves into a riot and take photos to spread all over the newspapers.
Yes, we are on to you, just as we are on to OP. Why don't you focus on your own party, your own neighborhood, the corruption in D.C. and do something productive for the democrats instead of engaging in the politics of personal destruction against the right?
What's this? You're telling me I can't participate in the democratic process? How unpatriotic of you PP. I don't have an elected representative, and thus I have no say over how those dollars are spent. Right now, I'm relying on Chaffetz, an idiot from Utah, who thinks he knows what's best for the District. I don't want a Republican controlled Congress because it's not in my best interests. I'm glad you're "on to" me. Unseating Comstock by making donations and campaigning for candidates to oppose her are well within my rights and are about focusing on my party. If there's a townhall or protest to attend, I'll do those as well. And I'll continue to stay engaged with what's happening here in the District. Not sure what you mean by "politics of personal destruction." If it means exercising the rights I have as a US citizen that lead to a different candidate being elected in 2018, then guilty as charged.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:she didn't lose by much last time. I think she's going down in 2018.
Bullshit. She gained even the Langley district by more votes than ever before. Signed - a poll watcher.
NP here:okay, that's fine that she did well in Langley. However, 2014 she won the election by 16 points. In 2016, it was down to 5points.
https://ballotpedia.org/Virginia%27s_10th_Congressional_District_election,_2016
As a DC resident and Democrat, I plan to do whatever I can to make sure she is out.
Why? She's not your representative. Why? Because you are mad that Trump lost. So instead of trying to fix your own party, you and the like-minded are trying to force Republican lawmakers to townhalls where you can throw stuff at them, start a dangerous protest, hope it evolves into a riot and take photos to spread all over the newspapers.
Yes, we are on to you, just as we are on to OP. Why don't you focus on your own party, your own neighborhood, the corruption in D.C. and do something productive for the democrats instead of engaging in the politics of personal destruction against the right?