I disagree. Asking about current events like what are the biggest concerns facing society today is very different that asking your political views and affiliation. The first gives you an idea if the student is well informed and able to articulate a position. The second is no one's business and should have no bearing n the admissions process and as our country becomes more and more polarized politically can impact an interviewers opinion on a candidate. In fact, the mere question gives the impression of a political litmus test.Anonymous wrote:OP you are reading way too much into this.
Asking about current events is relevant. If you want to shield an incoming college student from discussing current events for fear of upsetting them, I don't think college (any college) is going to be a good place for your daughter.
Are you 18? If not, what you, as an adult would do, has no real bearing here. I think she handled herself well under the circumstances.Anonymous wrote:Your DD should have raised the issue then and there. I would have.
I would have articulated then and there that I think it's an inappropriate question to ask for a college interview because it gives the impression that there's a political litmus test for acceptance into the college.
. You might want to check your knee jerk reaction. Op clearly states that her daughter is a progressive. There are progressives that have no desire to shut down diversity of thought or to only surround themselves with people who share their world view. Obviously, you are not one of those people.Anonymous wrote:Then limit your interests to conservative colleges or look overseas. Many conservatives like yourself have found their niche in college. You are deluded if you think there are no conservatives doing well and happy in "left leaning" colleges.Anonymous wrote:Actually, it isn't. We have a big problem in higher education if political views are considered pertinent in determining admissions.Anonymous wrote:Then just don't go where you will fill uncomfortable. It's as simple as that.Anonymous wrote:Op here. Thank you for your responses. The university in question definitely skews left by all accounts. However, DD felt a good sense of inclusivity on her tours of the campus something that is important to her as she believes human growth cannot occur if we only surround ourselves with those with whom we agree--a form of confirmation bias. At first, DD thought the interviewer was simply trying to discern if she was politically informed or if she was capable of thinking on her feet and articulating a position--although there are certainly ways to go about this without asking a stranger something as personal as political affiliation. DD did an excellent job of responding to this question and the interviewer seemed impressed although it was evident that DD and the interviewer held similar political leanings. However, it all took a turn for the worse when DD was asked and subsequently responded that she had not participated in the march. In light of how this discussion (or perhaps better phrased interrogation) transpired, it became evident to her and to those with whom she shared the conversation that this was something more than just a "test" of her ability to think on her feet. Anyone who seriously considers this university understands that it is known for being far left of center. As DD is herself a progressive she welcomes the social activism. However, she does not want to attend a university that shuts down diversity of thought and is concerned that this interviewer may be indicative of that line of thinking. The interviewer said that she had been asked to pose the question of her political leanings (although there was no indication that the follow up questions regarding the march were "official,") and DD is trying to figure out if a university would actually make this a part of their application decision or if it was simply the interviewer (alumni) taking it upon herself to insert her own standards to the process. In DD's estimation the first would be a problem and the second, while offensive would should not factor into her decision. It really has clouded her views of the university as none of us would relish being criticized in this manner especially when there is an imbalance of power between the two people.
You and your kid are already at a disadvantage going at this with a chip on your shoulder.
Then limit your interests to conservative colleges or look overseas. Many conservatives like yourself have found their niche in college. You are deluded if you think there are no conservatives doing well and happy in "left leaning" colleges.Anonymous wrote:Actually, it isn't. We have a big problem in higher education if political views are considered pertinent in determining admissions.Anonymous wrote:Then just don't go where you will fill uncomfortable. It's as simple as that.Anonymous wrote:Op here. Thank you for your responses. The university in question definitely skews left by all accounts. However, DD felt a good sense of inclusivity on her tours of the campus something that is important to her as she believes human growth cannot occur if we only surround ourselves with those with whom we agree--a form of confirmation bias. At first, DD thought the interviewer was simply trying to discern if she was politically informed or if she was capable of thinking on her feet and articulating a position--although there are certainly ways to go about this without asking a stranger something as personal as political affiliation. DD did an excellent job of responding to this question and the interviewer seemed impressed although it was evident that DD and the interviewer held similar political leanings. However, it all took a turn for the worse when DD was asked and subsequently responded that she had not participated in the march. In light of how this discussion (or perhaps better phrased interrogation) transpired, it became evident to her and to those with whom she shared the conversation that this was something more than just a "test" of her ability to think on her feet. Anyone who seriously considers this university understands that it is known for being far left of center. As DD is herself a progressive she welcomes the social activism. However, she does not want to attend a university that shuts down diversity of thought and is concerned that this interviewer may be indicative of that line of thinking. The interviewer said that she had been asked to pose the question of her political leanings (although there was no indication that the follow up questions regarding the march were "official,") and DD is trying to figure out if a university would actually make this a part of their application decision or if it was simply the interviewer (alumni) taking it upon herself to insert her own standards to the process. In DD's estimation the first would be a problem and the second, while offensive would should not factor into her decision. It really has clouded her views of the university as none of us would relish being criticized in this manner especially when there is an imbalance of power between the two people.
Actually, it isn't. We have a big problem in higher education if political views are considered pertinent in determining admissions.Anonymous wrote:Then just don't go where you will fill uncomfortable. It's as simple as that.Anonymous wrote:Op here. Thank you for your responses. The university in question definitely skews left by all accounts. However, DD felt a good sense of inclusivity on her tours of the campus something that is important to her as she believes human growth cannot occur if we only surround ourselves with those with whom we agree--a form of confirmation bias. At first, DD thought the interviewer was simply trying to discern if she was politically informed or if she was capable of thinking on her feet and articulating a position--although there are certainly ways to go about this without asking a stranger something as personal as political affiliation. DD did an excellent job of responding to this question and the interviewer seemed impressed although it was evident that DD and the interviewer held similar political leanings. However, it all took a turn for the worse when DD was asked and subsequently responded that she had not participated in the march. In light of how this discussion (or perhaps better phrased interrogation) transpired, it became evident to her and to those with whom she shared the conversation that this was something more than just a "test" of her ability to think on her feet. Anyone who seriously considers this university understands that it is known for being far left of center. As DD is herself a progressive she welcomes the social activism. However, she does not want to attend a university that shuts down diversity of thought and is concerned that this interviewer may be indicative of that line of thinking. The interviewer said that she had been asked to pose the question of her political leanings (although there was no indication that the follow up questions regarding the march were "official,") and DD is trying to figure out if a university would actually make this a part of their application decision or if it was simply the interviewer (alumni) taking it upon herself to insert her own standards to the process. In DD's estimation the first would be a problem and the second, while offensive would should not factor into her decision. It really has clouded her views of the university as none of us would relish being criticized in this manner especially when there is an imbalance of power between the two people.
Anonymous wrote:This is a tough question. I think there will be a few schools who are actually looking to find a few good students to help bring a healthy discussion of this question to their campuses.
Anonymous wrote:This is a completely inappropriate question. It does give the sense that diversity of opinion is not welcome. I hope it simply reflect's the alum's poor judgement rather than the college.
You have a right to feel it was a "push" question. Glad to know your daughter wants to be able to be surrounded by people with different opinions. You raised her well.