Anonymous wrote:I'm all for securing the border but who is paying for this wall??? We were told Mexico would.


They better not touch ONE DIME of US taxpayer money.

\

They are not. The US is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Congress has to authorize the budget for it. Given a freeze on federal hiring, it seems imprudent.

You don't seem to understand that much.

Another fed lawyer without any real working experience

What happened to Bush's and Obama's "virtual wall" / Secure Border Initiative to create an impenetrable cyber wall no human being could possibly cross?

oh wait - that was a huge failure:

http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-651T

-Which left many areas of the border wide open- even to unaccompanied minors.

Time to build a real wall.

Anonymous wrote:Bast. News. Ever!!!! Trump is a man of his word. He will do great things for America!!!!

Please explain to me how he is a "man of his word" if WE pay for the wall.

I'll wait.

Anonymous wrote:I'm all for securing the border but who is paying for this wall??? We were told Mexico would.


They better not touch ONE DIME of US taxpayer money.

We will pay and they will "reimburse" which of course will never happen

Anonymous wrote:Bast. News. Ever!!!! Trump is a man of his word. He will do great things for America!!!!

Like pollute the air and water, deny science... yea, that's the best thing for America. snort.

I'm all for securing the border but who is paying for this wall??? We were told Mexico would.


They better not touch ONE DIME of US taxpayer money.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Congress has to authorize the budget for it. Given a freeze on federal hiring, it seems imprudent.

Not too worry. Obama really ballooned federal hiring over his term. We did just fine with less paper pushers, silly servants and professional meeting attenders.

I heard yesterday that the federal workforce is the smallest it's been since Regan. Please post a link that supports your assertion.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is just great. Trump's going to build a wall and cut off one means for escape.

You could still find your way out, right? But you don't really want to.

You're a little dense, aren't you. Actually, I have applied to emigrate to New Zealand.

Anonymous wrote:This is just great. Trump's going to build a wall and cut off one means for escape.

You could still find your way out, right? But you don't really want to.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Congress has to authorize the budget for it. Given a freeze on federal hiring, it seems imprudent.

Not too worry. Obama really ballooned federal hiring over his term. We did just fine with less paper pushers, silly servants and professional meeting attenders.

#AlternativeFacts

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The percentage of the workforce that works for the federal government is at a post-WW2 low. " - where do you get these numbers? Cutting the military and then ballooning the silly service numbers?

Have any alternative facts?

Honest question, but does that cover the contractors who work for the government in roles that used to be federal employees? I know the agencies I work with have a TON of people (I will make no judgements of their usefulness) who are present, have offices, appear to be federal employees but are contractors.

This is a good question (I'm a contractor, btw). What I see at my agency is that contractors often fill roles of multiple vacancies. For example, I am doing the job of two people who left the agency (both excellent people, by the way). So, the office saves money and ultimately, I can be fired at any time very easily, unlike federal workers.

Anonymous wrote:He can't build a wall all by himself you know?
He needs congressional approval to allocate the money

Maybe he could if he didn't have such tiny hands...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"The percentage of the workforce that works for the federal government is at a post-WW2 low. " - where do you get these numbers? Cutting the military and then ballooning the silly service numbers?

Have any alternative facts?

Honest question, but does that cover the contractors who work for the government in roles that used to be federal employees? I know the agencies I work with have a TON of people (I will make no judgements of their usefulness) who are present, have offices, appear to be federal employees but are contractors.

BEST!!!!