Anonymous wrote:
Any decent human being would understand that it is a worse crime to conspire to physically harm political opponents than to investigate and liberate (supposedly) some kids.
Thank God your candidate lost the election.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.
He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .
The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?
What is the crime, and why do you seem to care so much about it?
In the last week, there's been at least a dozen armed robberies and murders in DC, which are obviously worse than a stupid guy walking around with a gun in a restaurant.
Are the political leanings, or the skin color, of the offenders so important to you?
Why are you trying to excuse this man's actions? Is it because of his political leanings or skin color? What have you done to demonstrate your concern about hose other incidents of crime?
What's your evidence to say I'm "trying to excuse his actions"? From my posts it's pretty obvious that I am not.
Now, I do notice some biased partisan hate, or exactly the same type the gunman brought to bear.
You both seem to inhabite very isolated bubbles, which is quite sad, and the very problem we are facing.
My evidence that you are trying to excuse his actions is that you are arguing that he should not be called a "shooter" (i.e. you are excusing that he shot his gun) and that you asked "What is the crime" as if you are unaware of the multiple felonies with which Welch has been charged or don't consider those felonies to be crimes.
You suffer from a very bad case of transference. Any partisan hate is entirely on your part, demonstrated by your inability to call a shooter a shooter or even recognize a crime. Similarly, the only isolated bubble in evidence is the one in which you inhabit and in which merely stating facts is considered a partisan action.
Since you just blocked my separate thread, let me post here.
Some crazy activists met in December to discuss how to throw acid at Trump supporters during Inauguration Day.
And, guess where they met?
Comet Ping Pong.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety...2Fstory&utm_term=.63c46dbb1f30
You'll agree with me that their crime is exponentially worse than the deranged gunman, correct?
Their "plot" was to spread -- not throw -- butyric acid, which is really stinky. They wanted to stink out the ball-goers. And then they decided not to do it. They now claim they knew they had been infiltrated and were just having a joke on the infiltrator.
The deranged gunman actually fired a gun in a crowded restaurant. So you're saying it's "exponentially worse" to talk about doing something and not do it, than to actually endanger other people? You've slipped beyond alternate facts.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.
He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .
The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?
What is the crime, and why do you seem to care so much about it?
In the last week, there's been at least a dozen armed robberies and murders in DC, which are obviously worse than a stupid guy walking around with a gun in a restaurant.
Are the political leanings, or the skin color, of the offenders so important to you?
Why are you trying to excuse this man's actions? Is it because of his political leanings or skin color? What have you done to demonstrate your concern about hose other incidents of crime?
What's your evidence to say I'm "trying to excuse his actions"? From my posts it's pretty obvious that I am not.
Now, I do notice some biased partisan hate, or exactly the same type the gunman brought to bear.
You both seem to inhabite very isolated bubbles, which is quite sad, and the very problem we are facing.
My evidence that you are trying to excuse his actions is that you are arguing that he should not be called a "shooter" (i.e. you are excusing that he shot his gun) and that you asked "What is the crime" as if you are unaware of the multiple felonies with which Welch has been charged or don't consider those felonies to be crimes.
You suffer from a very bad case of transference. Any partisan hate is entirely on your part, demonstrated by your inability to call a shooter a shooter or even recognize a crime. Similarly, the only isolated bubble in evidence is the one in which you inhabit and in which merely stating facts is considered a partisan action.
Since you just blocked my separate thread, let me post here.
Some crazy activists met in December to discuss how to throw acid at Trump supporters during Inauguration Day.
And, guess where they met?
Comet Ping Pong.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety...2Fstory&utm_term=.63c46dbb1f30
You'll agree with me that their crime is exponentially worse than the deranged gunman, correct?
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.
He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .
The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?
What is the crime, and why do you seem to care so much about it?
In the last week, there's been at least a dozen armed robberies and murders in DC, which are obviously worse than a stupid guy walking around with a gun in a restaurant.
Are the political leanings, or the skin color, of the offenders so important to you?
Why are you trying to excuse this man's actions? Is it because of his political leanings or skin color? What have you done to demonstrate your concern about hose other incidents of crime?
What's your evidence to say I'm "trying to excuse his actions"? From my posts it's pretty obvious that I am not.
Now, I do notice some biased partisan hate, or exactly the same type the gunman brought to bear.
You both seem to inhabite very isolated bubbles, which is quite sad, and the very problem we are facing.
My evidence that you are trying to excuse his actions is that you are arguing that he should not be called a "shooter" (i.e. you are excusing that he shot his gun) and that you asked "What is the crime" as if you are unaware of the multiple felonies with which Welch has been charged or don't consider those felonies to be crimes.
You suffer from a very bad case of transference. Any partisan hate is entirely on your part, demonstrated by your inability to call a shooter a shooter or even recognize a crime. Similarly, the only isolated bubble in evidence is the one in which you inhabit and in which merely stating facts is considered a partisan action.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.
He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .
The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?
What is the crime, and why do you seem to care so much about it?
In the last week, there's been at least a dozen armed robberies and murders in DC, which are obviously worse than a stupid guy walking around with a gun in a restaurant.
Are the political leanings, or the skin color, of the offenders so important to you?
Why are you trying to excuse this man's actions? Is it because of his political leanings or skin color? What have you done to demonstrate your concern about hose other incidents of crime?
What's your evidence to say I'm "trying to excuse his actions"? From my posts it's pretty obvious that I am not.
Now, I do notice some biased partisan hate, or exactly the same type the gunman brought to bear.
You both seem to inhabite very isolated bubbles, which is quite sad, and the very problem we are facing.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.
He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .
The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?
What is the crime, and why do you seem to care so much about it?
In the last week, there's been at least a dozen armed robberies and murders in DC, which are obviously worse than a stupid guy walking around with a gun in a restaurant.
Are the political leanings, or the skin color, of the offenders so important to you?
Why are you trying to excuse this man's actions? Is it because of his political leanings or skin color? What have you done to demonstrate your concern about hose other incidents of crime?
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.
He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .
The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?
What is the crime, and why do you seem to care so much about it?
In the last week, there's been at least a dozen armed robberies and murders in DC, which are obviously worse than a stupid guy walking around with a gun in a restaurant.
Are the political leanings, or the skin color, of the offenders so important to you?
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.
He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .
The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?
What is the crime, and why do you seem to care so much about it?
In the last week, there's been at least a dozen armed robberies and murders in DC, which are obviously worse than a stupid guy walking around with a gun in a restaurant.
Are the political leanings, or the skin color, of the offenders so important to you?
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.
He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .
The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?
Podesta is a weird dude , no telling what's there if you kick that rock over. That's just one reason they are going for a plea which on the surface would make no sense. You never know what might come out of discovery.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.
He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .
The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.
He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .
The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?
Podesta is a weird dude , no telling what's there if you kick that rock over. That's just one reason they are going for a plea which on the surface would make no sense. You never know what might come out of discovery.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.
He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .
The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?
Podesta is a weird dude , no telling what's there if you kick that rock over. That's just one reason they are going for a plea which on the surface would make no sense. You never know what might come out of discovery.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.
He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .
The emails have been subject to considerable investigation. What do you think led to this crime?
Anonymous wrote:His defense is that he was protecting underage sex ring victims.
He could investigate the emails and depose the people involved . Could get messy .