Anonymous
01/14/2017 10:47
Subject: Re:Why are the British royals not very attractive?
They made a cute couple and they have always been very devoted to each other.
Anonymous
01/14/2017 10:38
Subject: Why are the British royals not very attractive?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:King George XI was rather handsome as a young man, but his older brother (Duke of Windsor) wasn't much to look at. One of their younger brothers (can't remember which one), was strikingly handsome in pictures.
Queen Elizabeth was a cute child and an attractive woman. She really looks incredible for 90. Her blue eyes are beautiful! Margaret was very attractive as a young woman and was supposed to be even prettier in person. Margaret not age well, probably because of her various addictions.
Poor Prince Charles didn't inherit his father's good looks. Who does he even look like, anyway? Some ancestor obviously, because he doesn't really resemble either of his parents.
William was a very handsome young man but his receding hairline doesn't suit him. He's still a good looking guy overall. Harry looks a whole lot like Charles, but is probably considered more attractive because of his engaging personality.
Beatrice and Eugenie need a stylist. It's almost like they try to look ridiculous, though Eugenie is nice looking.
The kids are cute, but poor little George looks apprehensive in almost every picture. He has a long life of having his picture taken ahead of him.
I don't think any of the Royals look too bad and, yes, they are not paid models or entertainers so we get what we get with them. Perhaps least attractive of all is the Princess Royal, but she does the most good work next to the Queen.
Its British public knowledge that Harry is not Charles' biological son. So no, he doesn't look remotely like him.
No, it isn't. Except perhaps among those who read tabloids like the Daily Mail for their "news", and who also believe aliens are advising Queen Elizabeth.
Harry looks much like his red-headed uncle, Earl Spenser, looked at the same age. That's Diana's brother.
Anonymous
01/14/2017 10:34
Subject: Re:Why are the British royals not very attractive?
Way more attractive than "average":
https://www.google.com/search?q=young+queen+elizabeth+and+philip&prmd=ivn&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiXpo6J-sHRAhXD44MKHRXmDgUQ_AUIBygB&biw=360&bih=615#imgrc=muSLygu95qr9OM%3A
https://www.google.com/search?q=young+queen+elizabeth+and+philip&prmd=ivn&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiXpo6J-sHRAhXD44MKHRXmDgUQ_AUIBygB&biw=360&bih=615#imgrc=saYfJHD6txZobM%3A
https://www.google.com/search?q=young+queen+elizabeth+and+philip&prmd=ivn&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiXpo6J-sHRAhXD44MKHRXmDgUQ_AUIBygB&biw=360&bih=615#imgrc=muSLygu95qr9OM%3A
https://www.google.com/search?q=young+queen+elizabeth+and+philip&prmd=ivn&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiXpo6J-sHRAhXD44MKHRXmDgUQ_AUIBygB&biw=360&bih=615#imgrc=saYfJHD6txZobM%3A
Anonymous
01/14/2017 10:30
Subject: Re:Why are the British royals not very attractive?
Anonymous wrote:I beg to differ -- the Queen was very pretty as a young woman.
Not at all, she looked very put together though
Anonymous
01/14/2017 10:27
Subject: Why are the British royals not very attractive?
There are no plastic surgeries. If you take a look at the new queen of Spain, she went under a big face transformation. I don't like it at all. The queen of Netherlands, instead, keeps her authentic beauty.
Anonymous
01/14/2017 10:19
Subject: Re:Why are the British royals not very attractive?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I beg to differ -- the Queen was very pretty as a young woman.
No, she wasn't. You know that ACTRESSES portrayed her in movies like A Royal Night Out, right?
Yes, she was! Beauty is somewhat subjective, but google "young Queen Elizabeth." She was very attractive and elegant looking.
I agree with you PP. She was an attractive young woman IMO.
Her husband was attractive, too -- they were/are a very nice looking pair. She has always looked very "put together." Yes, she's dressed materonly in OUR lifetimes, but she is 90!
Love her eyebrows!:
https://www.google.com/search?q=young+queen+Elizabeth&prmd=inv&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiVoJPE9sHRAhWIYiYKHVR5AYkQ_AUIBygB&biw=360&bih=615#imgrc=DbZ5mn6Li1KA9M%3A
Anonymous
01/14/2017 10:18
Subject: Re:Why are the British royals not very attractive?
I think Princess Anne, Prince Andrew and Prince Edward were all average to above average when they were younger. Prince Andrew is still not bad for his age.
Anonymous
01/14/2017 10:13
Subject: Re:Why are the British royals not very attractive?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I beg to differ -- the Queen was very pretty as a young woman.
No, she wasn't. You know that ACTRESSES portrayed her in movies like A Royal Night Out, right?
Yes, she was! Beauty is somewhat subjective, but google "young Queen Elizabeth." She was very attractive and elegant looking.
I agree with you PP. She was an attractive young woman IMO.
Her husband was attractive, too -- they were/are a very nice looking pair. She has always looked very "put together." Yes, she's dressed materonly in OUR lifetimes, but she is 90!
Anonymous
01/14/2017 10:07
Subject: Why are the British royals not very attractive?
When Prince Andrew was a young, playboy he wasn't bad looking. He had models line up at the back of Buckingham Palace, much like groupies lining up to see Bon Jovi, or whoever.
Anonymous
01/14/2017 09:56
Subject: Why are the British royals not very attractive?
Anonymous wrote:Inbred. Seriously.
This.
Anonymous
01/14/2017 09:54
Subject: Why are the British royals not very attractive?
Anonymous wrote:It's called the Hapsburg Chin.
It's all the same deformity. Hapsburg lip, Hapsburg chin, and Hapsburg jaw.
Anonymous
01/14/2017 09:51
Subject: Why are the British royals not very attractive?
Anonymous wrote:Fergie's kids don't seem too bad. The red haired one just needed a different hairstyle IMO.
Other than that, look at the gene pool. William and Harry didn't get enough from their mom.
Princess Beatriz is good looking. I've been with her in person -- quite attractive. Not Hollywood attractive, sure, but if you put her on the DC Metro she'd likely be one of the most attractive women on the car. Look around; very few of us are stunners.
Anonymous
01/14/2017 09:48
Subject: Why are the British royals not very attractive?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:King George XI was rather handsome as a young man, but his older brother (Duke of Windsor) wasn't much to look at. One of their younger brothers (can't remember which one), was strikingly handsome in pictures.
Queen Elizabeth was a cute child and an attractive woman. She really looks incredible for 90. Her blue eyes are beautiful! Margaret was very attractive as a young woman and was supposed to be even prettier in person. Margaret not age well, probably because of her various addictions.
Poor Prince Charles didn't inherit his father's good looks. Who does he even look like, anyway? Some ancestor obviously, because he doesn't really resemble either of his parents.
William was a very handsome young man but his receding hairline doesn't suit him. He's still a good looking guy overall. Harry looks a whole lot like Charles, but is probably considered more attractive because of his engaging personality.
Beatrice and Eugenie need a stylist. It's almost like they try to look ridiculous, though Eugenie is nice looking.
The kids are cute, but poor little George looks apprehensive in almost every picture. He has a long life of having his picture taken ahead of him.
I don't think any of the Royals look too bad and, yes, they are not paid models or entertainers so we get what we get with them. Perhaps least attractive of all is the Princess Royal, but she does the most good work next to the Queen.
Its British public knowledge that Harry is not Charles' biological son. So no, he doesn't look remotely like him.
But he does bear a strong resemblance to Prince Phillip:
http://www.everythingzoomer.com/prince-harry-bears-striking-resemblance-young-prince-philip/
Anonymous
01/14/2017 09:37
Subject: Why are the British royals not very attractive?
yes!Anonymous wrote:King George looked like Tim Curry.
Anonymous
01/14/2017 09:36
Subject: Why are the British royals not very attractive?
Anonymous wrote:King George XI was rather handsome as a young man, but his older brother (Duke of Windsor) wasn't much to look at. One of their younger brothers (can't remember which one), was strikingly handsome in pictures.
Queen Elizabeth was a cute child and an attractive woman. She really looks incredible for 90. Her blue eyes are beautiful! Margaret was very attractive as a young woman and was supposed to be even prettier in person. Margaret not age well, probably because of her various addictions.
Poor Prince Charles didn't inherit his father's good looks. Who does he even look like, anyway? Some ancestor obviously, because he doesn't really resemble either of his parents.
William was a very handsome young man but his receding hairline doesn't suit him. He's still a good looking guy overall. Harry looks a whole lot like Charles, but is probably considered more attractive because of his engaging personality.
Beatrice and Eugenie need a stylist. It's almost like they try to look ridiculous, though Eugenie is nice looking.
The kids are cute, but poor little George looks apprehensive in almost every picture. He has a long life of having his picture taken ahead of him.
I don't think any of the Royals look too bad and, yes, they are not paid models or entertainers so we get what we get with them. Perhaps least attractive of all is the Princess Royal, but she does the most good work next to the Queen.
Its British public knowledge that Harry is not Charles' biological son. So no, he doesn't look remotely like him.