Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Franklin is for profit . In other words, owner is taking it in, at the expense of teachers salaries, benefits. It is a moral issue for me so I could not send my child there. Not to mention the safety issue, when they left s child st the park unattended.
Plus 1!!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a Franklin parent. Love it. The leaving the child at the playground thing was a mistake that they took ownership of. It's a beautiful building with great teachers and great programs. My child is happy and thriving and I recommend it to everyone.
Really? They took ownership of it after the first time AND after the second time they left a child at the playground?
That means, when pressed, they admitted it happened. Aren't they special?