Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see this behavior in a lot of lawyers (I'm one myself).
The trial, the all-important trial. God help everyone else on earth, because the all-important trial must give way. Nothing else is as important. Nothing can get in the way of preparation for the all-important trial. God help anyone who has any needs at all during trial preparation.
Ridiculous. Ridonkulous.
Sounds like you've never actually been on trial.
I'm not the PP, but it doesn't matter. A death in the family does, in fact, trump a legal trial.
But it's not an immediate family member. It's OP's mom's BF's mom! OP's client, the judge and all the witnesses who set aside time to be there aren't going to care. I'm not saying the mom shouldn't have gone, but OP is stuck.
OP's mom has been dating this man for decades. It is his immediate family member. She could have given OP more notice, I agree, but it wouldn't have changed the fact that OP would need to find back-up child care for next week.
Sure, the judge, witnesses, etc. won't care that OP's mom had a family emergency and could not care for her kids as planned. That's why OP and her husband need to put on their thinking caps and find back-up child care.
If you're insinuating that OP's mom should tell her boyfriend, "sorry your mom died in a car crash, but I can't come because the judges and witnesses involved in my DD's trial won't understand!" then you are insane.
OP is not stuck. She can get on her neighborhood list serv. She can call one of the many child care agencies. She has options.
You are reading way too much into my post. I was responding to the PP who said this situation trumps a trial. I was simply saying that OP is stuck with the trial. I never said OP's mom shouldn't go. I also don't think OP is being unreasonable by feeling frustrated at the situation. I think a lot of us would feel that way under the circumstances.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op: It wasn't so much that she left. It was the manner in which she left. She didn't try to see if I had things in order, or give me time to get situated. She was also ok with leaving while my children were at school without telling them bye. She has put him before me since I was in high school. To the point that I had to give up my bed and sleep on a couch because he and his mother needed a place to sleep. I thought a day or two notice would have been considerate. My husband has been begging for us to have Christmas at home to start our own traditions, but every year I go visit her so that she can have her whole family with her. I guess I should start putting my husband first too right?
What other resentments are you holding onto regarding your mom? That mention about Christmas travel at the end signals that there may be history here that goes beyond this specific situation about which you posted.
You also made the little note that mom's SO is "on and off again" as a boyfriend; choosing to point that out seems to indicate you don't think their relationship merits her choosing him over your needs. You can see how it reads that way, can't you, OP?
If you can step aside from the focus on your trial and this one week (out of all the weeks in your life), can you see how a death, especially a sudden, traumatic one, should take precedence over a few days of babysitting the grandkids to help you out? There will be other trials -and other times you might need help. This is not some huge do-or-die litmus test of her love for your kids or her willingness to help you ( unless you choose to see it as such a test and insist she's failed).
You should listen to your DH and establish your own traditions at home, absolutely. But if you do that, even in part, as a way to get back at your mom over a situation she did not create or control -- that would be a sad motivation for staying home and creating traditions.
Anonymous wrote:Op: It wasn't so much that she left. It was the manner in which she left. She didn't try to see if I had things in order, or give me time to get situated. She was also ok with leaving while my children were at school without telling them bye. She has put him before me since I was in high school. To the point that I had to give up my bed and sleep on a couch because he and his mother needed a place to sleep. I thought a day or two notice would have been considerate. My husband has been begging for us to have Christmas at home to start our own traditions, but every year I go visit her so that she can have her whole family with her. I guess I should start putting my husband first too right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see this behavior in a lot of lawyers (I'm one myself).
The trial, the all-important trial. God help everyone else on earth, because the all-important trial must give way. Nothing else is as important. Nothing can get in the way of preparation for the all-important trial. God help anyone who has any needs at all during trial preparation.
Ridiculous. Ridonkulous.
Sounds like you've never actually been on trial.
You'd be wrong.
I'm sure your clients would be thrilled to know how unimportant their trials are to their lawyer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see this behavior in a lot of lawyers (I'm one myself).
The trial, the all-important trial. God help everyone else on earth, because the all-important trial must give way. Nothing else is as important. Nothing can get in the way of preparation for the all-important trial. God help anyone who has any needs at all during trial preparation.
Ridiculous. Ridonkulous.
Sounds like you've never actually been on trial.
I'm not the PP, but it doesn't matter. A death in the family does, in fact, trump a legal trial.
But it's not an immediate family member. It's OP's mom's BF's mom! OP's client, the judge and all the witnesses who set aside time to be there aren't going to care. I'm not saying the mom shouldn't have gone, but OP is stuck.
OP's mom has been dating this man for decades. It is his immediate family member. She could have given OP more notice, I agree, but it wouldn't have changed the fact that OP would need to find back-up child care for next week.
Sure, the judge, witnesses, etc. won't care that OP's mom had a family emergency and could not care for her kids as planned. That's why OP and her husband need to put on their thinking caps and find back-up child care.
If you're insinuating that OP's mom should tell her boyfriend, "sorry your mom died in a car crash, but I can't come because the judges and witnesses involved in my DD's trial won't understand!" then you are insane.
OP is not stuck. She can get on her neighborhood list serv. She can call one of the many child care agencies. She has options.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see this behavior in a lot of lawyers (I'm one myself).
The trial, the all-important trial. God help everyone else on earth, because the all-important trial must give way. Nothing else is as important. Nothing can get in the way of preparation for the all-important trial. God help anyone who has any needs at all during trial preparation.
Ridiculous. Ridonkulous.
Sounds like you've never actually been on trial.
I'm not the PP, but it doesn't matter. A death in the family does, in fact, trump a legal trial.
But it's not an immediate family member. It's OP's mom's BF's mom! OP's client, the judge and all the witnesses who set aside time to be there aren't going to care. I'm not saying the mom shouldn't have gone, but OP is stuck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see this behavior in a lot of lawyers (I'm one myself).
The trial, the all-important trial. God help everyone else on earth, because the all-important trial must give way. Nothing else is as important. Nothing can get in the way of preparation for the all-important trial. God help anyone who has any needs at all during trial preparation.
Ridiculous. Ridonkulous.
Sounds like you've never actually been on trial.
I'm not the PP, but it doesn't matter. A death in the family does, in fact, trump a legal trial.
But it's not an immediate family member. It's OP's mom's BF's mom! OP's client, the judge and all the witnesses who set aside time to be there aren't going to care. I'm not saying the mom shouldn't have gone, but OP is stuck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see this behavior in a lot of lawyers (I'm one myself).
The trial, the all-important trial. God help everyone else on earth, because the all-important trial must give way. Nothing else is as important. Nothing can get in the way of preparation for the all-important trial. God help anyone who has any needs at all during trial preparation.
Ridiculous. Ridonkulous.
Sounds like you've never actually been on trial.
You'd be wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see this behavior in a lot of lawyers (I'm one myself).
The trial, the all-important trial. God help everyone else on earth, because the all-important trial must give way. Nothing else is as important. Nothing can get in the way of preparation for the all-important trial. God help anyone who has any needs at all during trial preparation.
Ridiculous. Ridonkulous.
Sounds like you've never actually been on trial.
I'm not the PP, but it doesn't matter. A death in the family does, in fact, trump a legal trial.