Anonymous wrote:You all are VERY naive if you don't think there are widespread pediphilia rings amongst the elites in DC, Hollywood, Palm Beach, NYC...

You are sick. Pedophilia is very very rare.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You all are VERY naive if you don't think there are widespread pediphilia rings amongst the elites in DC, Hollywood, Palm Beach, NYC...

F-you, Trump Nazi.

Still - nobody has provided evidence that there is anything wrong

Anonymous wrote:You all are VERY naive if you don't think there are widespread pediphilia rings amongst the elites in DC, Hollywood, Palm Beach, NYC...

F-you, Trump Nazi.

You all are VERY naive if you don't think there are widespread pediphilia rings amongst the elites in DC, Hollywood, Palm Beach, NYC...

Anonymous wrote:And now a guy with a rifle at Comet.

WTF.

This is craziness. An assault rifle mid day in a family pizza joint. Several blocks shut down. What in the world???

And now a guy with a rifle at Comet.

WTF.

Anonymous wrote:It's sad that as much as Clinton has flaunted the law and lied, it's hard for people to tell truth from fiction.

Convictions: 0

Anonymous wrote:[flash]

Anonymous wrote:

Podesta's leaked emails, which apparently included terms connected to pedophilia.

Prove it, freak.

I've looked & gone down the rabbit hole.

You can get your lazy ass out there & look yourself.

I'm not he freak. The Clinton clan is filled with them apparently.

I think you need to talk to your doctor about these thoughts. You're missing the part of the brain that rejects nonsense.

[flash]

Anonymous wrote:

Podesta's leaked emails, which apparently included terms connected to pedophilia.

Prove it, freak.

I've looked & gone down the rabbit hole.

You can get your lazy ass out there & look yourself.

I'm not he freak. The Clinton clan is filled with them apparently.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:can't some lawyer out there answer why this isn't the essence of reckless libel? why can't comet sue for libel?

They would need to identify the source of the story. That's tough in the Internet age.

Even if you don't know who specifically published it, one could certainly see about getting a court order to seize the domain of the fake news site that published the story and post a notice on the site that what they published was fraudulent.

4chan is not a "fake news site." It's not a news site period. Please stop pushing the "fake news" BS.

I have heard it started on 4chan but the whole thing is so bizarre I have trouble believing it ends there.

Podesta's leaked emails, which apparently included terms connected to pedophilia.

Prove it, freak.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:can't some lawyer out there answer why this isn't the essence of reckless libel? why can't comet sue for libel?

They would need to identify the source of the story. That's tough in the Internet age.

Even if you don't know who specifically published it, one could certainly see about getting a court order to seize the domain of the fake news site that published the story and post a notice on the site that what they published was fraudulent.

4chan is not a "fake news site." It's not a news site period. Please stop pushing the "fake news" BS.

right - It houses images.

So it's not fake news. If people spread rumors, it's b/c they were trying to connect the dots between some of these images and Podesta's leaked emails, which apparently included terms connected to pedophilia.

Conspiracy theories have been around forever. They're not ending now, folks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:can't some lawyer out there answer why this isn't the essence of reckless libel? why can't comet sue for libel?

They would need to identify the source of the story. That's tough in the Internet age.

Even if you don't know who specifically published it, one could certainly see about getting a court order to seize the domain of the fake news site that published the story and post a notice on the site that what they published was fraudulent.

4chan is not a "fake news site." It's not a news site period. Please stop pushing the "fake news" BS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:can't some lawyer out there answer why this isn't the essence of reckless libel? why can't comet sue for libel?

My organization was targeted last year and I will tell you that it is very difficult to fight it.

for child trafficking?