Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My MIL and FIL insist on taking my kid to church on Christmas. We are raising the kids agnostic. The kids are both under three so it's not like they sit still. It's annoying and my DH has no spine. This year, we're not going for Christmas. Problem solved.
Agnostic is a race???
Your inlaws just want to fill a pew with the people they love on Christmas and proudly share their adorable grandkids with their church friends. It is harmless.
You are being silly and petty.
Anonymous wrote:My MIL and FIL insist on taking my kid to church on Christmas. We are raising the kids agnostic. The kids are both under three so it's not like they sit still. It's annoying and my DH has no spine. This year, we're not going for Christmas. Problem solved.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a southern Christian AA woman from the South. My MIL is a European agnostic white woman who lives in the NE. I actually like both my ILs; they're great.
You mean Netherlands? Generally very easy going people, I find.
Anonymous wrote:Did your son marry a woman from a different race/culture?
How did you react? Do you respect her traditions, culture and heritage? Or are you trying to white-wash her?
I am a middle eastern woman engaged to a catholic guy and my prospective MIL is so uncomfortable at the idea. I am curious how other MILs act.
How 'bout you trying to brown-wash your MIL? How is that working out for you?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:White wash is an expression about covering up some misdeed. It's origins come from using cheap white paint. It's not a racist statement.
Yes that's true when it is used to describe circumstances which are being covered-up or camouflaged, as with paint. But describing the action of a white MIL trying to shape a DIL of another culture or race or ethnicity into someone who is more like MIl as "whitewashing"--that is offensive.
Non-white person here. I don't understand what is offensive about the term when it's describing something that is completely offensive- trying to erase or dismiss a non-white culture or heritage. Can you explain more?
NP. What I found somewhat offensive is what OP is saying "will they white wash me" before anything happens, showing prejudice herself ahead of time. She is posting ahead of time to find out how racist and accepting have other MILs been. This shows, to me, prejudice and intolerance on her part.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:White wash is an expression about covering up some misdeed. It's origins come from using cheap white paint. It's not a racist statement.
Yes that's true when it is used to describe circumstances which are being covered-up or camouflaged, as with paint. But describing the action of a white MIL trying to shape a DIL of another culture or race or ethnicity into someone who is more like MIl as "whitewashing"--that is offensive.
Non-white person here. I don't understand what is offensive about the term when it's describing something that is completely offensive- trying to erase or dismiss a non-white culture or heritage. Can you explain more?
NP. What I found somewhat offensive is what OP is saying "will they white wash me" before anything happens, showing prejudice herself ahead of time. She is posting ahead of time to find out how racist and accepting have other MILs been. This shows, to me, prejudice and intolerance on her part.
Anonymous wrote:My MIL and FIL insist on taking my kid to church on Christmas. We are raising the kids agnostic. The kids are both under three so it's not like they sit still. It's annoying and my DH has no spine. This year, we're not going for Christmas. Problem solved.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:White wash is an expression about covering up some misdeed. It's origins come from using cheap white paint. It's not a racist statement.
Yes that's true when it is used to describe circumstances which are being covered-up or camouflaged, as with paint. But describing the action of a white MIL trying to shape a DIL of another culture or race or ethnicity into someone who is more like MIl as "whitewashing"--that is offensive.
Non-white person here. I don't understand what is offensive about the term when it's describing something that is completely offensive- trying to erase or dismiss a non-white culture or heritage. Can you explain more?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:White wash is an expression about covering up some misdeed. It's origins come from using cheap white paint. It's not a racist statement.
Yes that's true when it is used to describe circumstances which are being covered-up or camouflaged, as with paint. But describing the action of a white MIL trying to shape a DIL of another culture or race or ethnicity into someone who is more like MIl as "whitewashing"--that is offensive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My MIL and FIL insist on taking my kid to church on Christmas. We are raising the kids agnostic. The kids are both under three so it's not like they sit still. It's annoying and my DH has no spine. This year, we're not going for Christmas. Problem solved.
Agnostic is a race???
Your inlaws just want to fill a pew with the people they love on Christmas and proudly share their adorable grandkids with their church friends. It is harmless.
You are being silly and petty.
Anonymous wrote:My MIL and FIL insist on taking my kid to church on Christmas. We are raising the kids agnostic. The kids are both under three so it's not like they sit still. It's annoying and my DH has no spine. This year, we're not going for Christmas. Problem solved.
Anonymous wrote:My MIL and FIL insist on taking my kid to church on Christmas. We are raising the kids agnostic. The kids are both under three so it's not like they sit still. It's annoying and my DH has no spine. This year, we're not going for Christmas. Problem solved.
Anonymous wrote:White wash is an expression about covering up some misdeed. It's origins come from using cheap white paint. It's not a racist statement.