Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is Jennifer Flowers?

I don't know. Gennifer Flowerss was a paramour of Bill Clinton's in the 80s or 90s. Or maybe the 70s? And Hillary Clinton was mean to her, way back when.

Perhaps it's time for Hillary to finally apologize to her.

I'm trying to think what cockamamie reason you've conjured up for Hillary to need to apologize to her husband's affair partner.

She went after that woman...ruined her life..slut shamed her because her husband raped her. Hillary is a feminist of convenience. She has no women in power position in her campaign.

The affair lasted for years and GENNIFER never screamed rape. Power is a powerful aphrodisiac! Juanita Broderick made her claim after the GOP Witch hunt.

If Flowers is brought up in the debate, Clinton should nod toward Melania and say that is ironic that both Bill Clinton and Donald Trump have former mistresses in the audience.

Perhaps they could seat Trump's child rape victim in front of him.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-bloom/why-the-new-child-rape-ca_b_10619944.html

It would be MUCH more interesting to have Monica Lewinsky sitting front and center....

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gennifer Flowers says she will attend debate

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/297620-gennifer-flowers-accepts-trumps-invitation-to-attend

Her face will remind the world about the REAL Hillary Clinton, and how badly she treats women.

Or, more realistically, will remind women of the witch hunt Republicans happily conducted against Hillary.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Clinton's move to put Cuban on the front row has already paid off. As can almost be guaranteed with Trump, he acts rashly without thinking. Attempting to shame via her husband's former mistress is hardly going to help Trump with woman voters. I don't think I can think of anything else that would actually create sympathy for Clinton. Moreover, it opens the floor to discussion of Trump's own affairs. If an affair by a candidate's husband is bad, then multiple affairs by a candidate must be worse, right?

I think this gives Clinton a "You're no Jack Kennedy" opportunity to say something along the lines of "affairs are terrible things. So, Mr. Trump, why did you not only have affairs during more than one marriage but brag about them?"

Not a chance that she is going to say anything on those lines. Bill C has too much baggage in this regard and Hillary does as an enabler. She won't even come close to allowing this to become a focal point of reviews of the debate in the days to follow.

In any event Fahrenkopf has said that Cuban will not have a front row seat and the last thing that Hillary wants is to have Flowers and other women involved with Bill to have any visibility during the debate.

Exactly. Hillary is a first class enabler in one of the most DYSFUNCTIONAL marriages on the American political scene. Her right hand woman, Huma is right there with her Anthony sham marriage. Funny how birds of a feather flock together.

I am so glad when people return to full function after TBI. While you were recovering, Weiner seated someone again (I know!) with his son in bed next to him (I know!), so Huma is divorcing Anthony (thank god, right?). All the best in your recovery!

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Clinton's move to put Cuban on the front row has already paid off. As can almost be guaranteed with Trump, he acts rashly without thinking. Attempting to shame via her husband's former mistress is hardly going to help Trump with woman voters. I don't think I can think of anything else that would actually create sympathy for Clinton. Moreover, it opens the floor to discussion of Trump's own affairs. If an affair by a candidate's husband is bad, then multiple affairs by a candidate must be worse, right?

I think this gives Clinton a "You're no Jack Kennedy" opportunity to say something along the lines of "affairs are terrible things. So, Mr. Trump, why did you not only have affairs during more than one marriage but brag about them?"

Not a chance that she is going to say anything on those lines. Bill C has too much baggage in this regard and Hillary does as an enabler. She won't even come close to allowing this to become a focal point of reviews of the debate in the days to follow.

In any event Fahrenkopf has said that Cuban will not have a front row seat and the last thing that Hillary wants is to have Flowers and other women involved with Bill to have any visibility during the debate.

With Trump running ads with Gennifer Flowers in them and Flowers potentially sitting in the front row, Clinton may not have a choice about the issue coming up. If it does come up, she has the opportunity to hit it out of the park. Let's say her critics or correct and she is an enabler. Trump actually committed exactly what Clinton allegedly enabled. Again, that makes Trump worse.

Flowers may remind voters (or introduce to younger voters) of Bill Clintons affair's. It it also gives Clinton to point out that Trump himself cheated on his first two wives with his second two.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Juanita Broderick and Kathleen Willey...Google them then talk about which candidate is the aggressor in the supposed 'war on women'. NEITHER candidate need go there.

Okay. Since Clinton is not going there, why don't you get Trump on board with that? Oh, that's right, he doesn't do anything that anybody wants him to. If he finds out what anyone wants him to do, he will do the opposite. Predictable that way.

These were investigated 20 years ago. The Republican special prosecutor declined to press charges. So unless there is a double standard for Clinton, he's innocent.

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Clinton's move to put Cuban on the front row has already paid off. As can almost be guaranteed with Trump, he acts rashly without thinking. Attempting to shame via her husband's former mistress is hardly going to help Trump with woman voters. I don't think I can think of anything else that would actually create sympathy for Clinton. Moreover, it opens the floor to discussion of Trump's own affairs. If an affair by a candidate's husband is bad, then multiple affairs by a candidate must be worse, right?

I think this gives Clinton a "You're no Jack Kennedy" opportunity to say something along the lines of "affairs are terrible things. So, Mr. Trump, why did you not only have affairs during more than one marriage but brag about them?"

Not a chance that she is going to say anything on those lines. Bill C has too much baggage in this regard and Hillary does as an enabler. She won't even come close to allowing this to become a focal point of reviews of the debate in the days to follow.

In any event Fahrenkopf has said that Cuban will not have a front row seat and the last thing that Hillary wants is to have Flowers and other women involved with Bill to have any visibility during the debate.

Exactly. Hillary is a first class enabler in one of the most DYSFUNCTIONAL marriages on the American political scene. Her right hand woman, Huma is right there with her Anthony sham marriage. Funny how birds of a feather flock together.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is Jennifer Flowers?

I don't know. Gennifer Flowerss was a paramour of Bill Clinton's in the 80s or 90s. Or maybe the 70s? And Hillary Clinton was mean to her, way back when.

Perhaps it's time for Hillary to finally apologize to her.

I'm trying to think what cockamamie reason you've conjured up for Hillary to need to apologize to her husband's affair partner.

She went after that woman...ruined her life..slut shamed her because her husband raped her. Hillary is a feminist of convenience. She has no women in power position in her campaign.

Hmmm. You're right. No women here, none at all. https://ballotpedia.org/Hillary_Clinton_presidential_campaign_key_staff_and_advisors,_2016

And she slut shamed her when? Her husband's affair partner? You republicans are really off on a toot most of the day, aren't you?

LOL, repubs are all butt-hurt when HRC supposedly slut-shames her husband's AP, but have no problem slut-shaming women who, for example, want birth control. Hypocrites.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gennifer Flowers says she will attend debate

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/297620-gennifer-flowers-accepts-trumps-invitation-to-attend

Her face will remind the world about the REAL Hillary Clinton, and how badly she treats women.

I say again, Trump supporters sling the mud at Clinton they wish they had the ovaries to say about Donald. Your claim is demonstrably false. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/04/more-than-just-a-symbol/476490/ (In case a scary liberal source scares you off, there are all sorts of links you can click on to find the original source!)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is Jennifer Flowers?

I don't know. Gennifer Flowerss was a paramour of Bill Clinton's in the 80s or 90s. Or maybe the 70s? And Hillary Clinton was mean to her, way back when.

Perhaps it's time for Hillary to finally apologize to her.

I'm trying to think what cockamamie reason you've conjured up for Hillary to need to apologize to her husband's affair partner.

She went after that woman...ruined her life..slut shamed her because her husband raped her. Hillary is a feminist of convenience. She has no women in power position in her campaign.

Hmmm. You're right. No women here, none at all. https://ballotpedia.org/Hillary_Clinton_presidential_campaign_key_staff_and_advisors,_2016

And she slut shamed her when? Her husband's affair partner? You republicans are really off on a toot most of the day, aren't you?

Anonymous wrote:Gennifer Flowers says she will attend debate

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/297620-gennifer-flowers-accepts-trumps-invitation-to-attend

Her face will remind the world about the REAL Hillary Clinton, and how badly she treats women.

Anonymous wrote:Juanita Broderick and Kathleen Willey...Google them then talk about which candidate is the aggressor in the supposed 'war on women'. NEITHER candidate need go there.

Okay. Since Clinton is not going there, why don't you get Trump on board with that? Oh, that's right, he doesn't do anything that anybody wants him to. If he finds out what anyone wants him to do, he will do the opposite. Predictable that way.

Trump's response already shows he is rattled. I think Cuban should send multiple twits during the debate... and some news network should show the twits live. It would be fun realty show if the moderator asks a questions related to Cuban's $10M offer.