Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Activity buses are totally standard and definitely necessary. Many if not most kids are coming home on a 4:30 bus to an empty house, so if parents were expected to pick them up after their activity then no one would be able to do activities.
Maybe in your county but I've never heard of them elsewhere. I don't think it's a school system's responsibility to provide additional busing for the convenience of parents. In ES, parents pay for before and after school childcare. Why should that be replaced with free busing in MS and HS?
Our local school is about half kids on free lunch. Their parents are at work. If they don't get a bus home then they can't stay and do band rehearsal or French club or tutoring. "Convenience of parents" makes it sound like a luxury. These buses are a necessity especially for poor children who also deserve enrichment even if their parents can't drive them all over the county for paid activities. It would be wildly unfair if rich schools got to field, say, football and soccer teams and poor schools didn't because no one could stay after school for practice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Activity buses are totally standard and definitely necessary. Many if not most kids are coming home on a 4:30 bus to an empty house, so if parents were expected to pick them up after their activity then no one would be able to do activities.
Maybe in your county but I've never heard of them elsewhere. I don't think it's a school system's responsibility to provide additional busing for the convenience of parents. In ES, parents pay for before and after school childcare. Why should that be replaced with free busing in MS and HS?
Our local school is about half kids on free lunch. Their parents are at work. If they don't get a bus home then they can't stay and do band rehearsal or French club or tutoring. "Convenience of parents" makes it sound like a luxury. These buses are a necessity especially for poor children who also deserve enrichment even if their parents can't drive them all over the county for paid activities. It would be wildly unfair if rich schools got to field, say, football and soccer teams and poor schools didn't because no one could stay after school for practice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Activity buses are totally standard and definitely necessary. Many if not most kids are coming home on a 4:30 bus to an empty house, so if parents were expected to pick them up after their activity then no one would be able to do activities.
Maybe in your county but I've never heard of them elsewhere. I don't think it's a school system's responsibility to provide additional busing for the convenience of parents. In ES, parents pay for before and after school childcare. Why should that be replaced with free busing in MS and HS?
Anonymous wrote:Another Takoma Park MS parent here. I echo the short commute to/from school and it's very walkable/bikable on Sligo Creek. My son typically leaves the house around 7:35 a.m. for the bus. We live about 1.5 miles from the school -- it's about a 10-15 minute ride. Activity buses take a little longer, but he and a friend just decided to walk home instead of taking the bus last week.
In terms of after-care, by 5th grade for my youngest, we've been leaving him home alone. He comes home, gets a snack and starts homework. We actually used to leave the house before he did in the morning and he'd set an alarm for leaving on time for his bus. He never missed it. By this age, they are completely capable of being responsible.