Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, I'm hooked. The only thing I thought was inaccurate was that the people's clothes in the hospital at the end looked more 1975 than 1980.
I agree. That last scene in the hospital looked circa 1969.
Nope, people still looked like it was the 70s in 1980.
Anonymous wrote:I loved it, but was baffled as to why they didn't do a csection from the beginning (sounds like the doctor knew a baby wasn't in the right position). Did they not do csections for multiples in 1980?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, I'm hooked. The only thing I thought was inaccurate was that the people's clothes in the hospital at the end looked more 1975 than 1980.
I agree. That last scene in the hospital looked circa 1969.
Anonymous wrote:Well, I'm hooked. The only thing I thought was inaccurate was that the people's clothes in the hospital at the end looked more 1975 than 1980.
Maybe there was a weird cut off date for school? My 11th grader is 16, he has a january birthday and is almost a year old than some of his peers who have December birthdays.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm confused about the Challenger. Wouldn't he have been six in 1986? In second grade you are almost that old.
A year too short. I'm 37 and saw it in second grade.
Maybe the character was gifted.