Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is fun to watch these posters (likely from Correct the Record) work so hard to try to convince some of us not to “throw away” our vote.
You might want to seek a real job. Your position at CTR will disappear in a couple of months.
Some of you keep saying this. It's really offensive that you think that anyone who likes Hillary must necessarily be paid. It makes me believe that the PP who thinks you're a Trump voter masquerading as a Sanders supporter is correct.
And oh my god, go back in the archives. We have done the "why I am voting for Hillary and you should, too" to death.
Anonymous wrote:
LOL sure...you sound like all those conservatives talking about Obama. You auctually have to get people to vote for your canidate. I am beginning to think Trump has a good chance because Hillary and company have not made a case to vote for Hillary. You know the under 35 vote is almost split even between Hillary, the 3rd party and Trump? Its Hillary's job to get those votes. She is failing because there is little difference between her and trump. Look at the unfavorable number one is at 62%, the other has 60%. When you talk about how bad the other person is all the time, you are not making a case for yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.
Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.
Being critical of her, or not liking her, does NOT mean you like or support Trump.
You have two choices. If you don't vote Clinton, you are supporting Trump. Actions speak louder than words.
pp here.
No, it isn't support of Trump.
And yet that is the effect a third party vote will have, no matter how much you like to think your meaningless little protest will occur in a vacuum. I don't know if you're a man or white or how well off you are, but the fact is that if Trump wins, people who did not vote for Hillary are going to have a lot worse than the Bush years ever could have been on their conscience. That's not "bullying," sensitive sally, that's a fact. What kind of climate work would we have done under Gore vs Bush? How much less gerrymandering might have occurred? I actually doubt 9/11 would have unfolded as it did, not to mention the bizarro reaction of attacking two unrelated nations. But you do you, I guess. Go Stein.
LOL sure...you sound like all those conservatives talking about Obama. You auctually have to get people to vote for your canidate. I am beginning to think Trump has a good chance because Hillary and company have not made a case to vote for Hillary. You know the under 35 vote is almost split even between Hillary, the 3rd party and Trump? Its Hillary's job to get those votes. She is failing because there is little difference between her and trump. Look at the unfavorable number one is at 62%, the other has 60%. When you talk about how bad the other person is all the time, you are not making a case for yourself.
Anonymous wrote:It is fun to watch these posters (likely from Correct the Record) work so hard to try to convince some of us not to “throw away” our vote.
You might want to seek a real job. Your position at CTR will disappear in a couple of months.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.
Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.
Being critical of her, or not liking her, does NOT mean you like or support Trump.
You have two choices. If you don't vote Clinton, you are supporting Trump. Actions speak louder than words.
pp here.
No, it isn't support of Trump.
And yet that is the effect a third party vote will have, no matter how much you like to think your meaningless little protest will occur in a vacuum. I don't know if you're a man or white or how well off you are, but the fact is that if Trump wins, people who did not vote for Hillary are going to have a lot worse than the Bush years ever could have been on their conscience. That's not "bullying," sensitive sally, that's a fact. What kind of climate work would we have done under Gore vs Bush? How much less gerrymandering might have occurred? I actually doubt 9/11 would have unfolded as it did, not to mention the bizarro reaction of attacking two unrelated nations. But you do you, I guess. Go Stein.
LOL sure...you sound like all those conservatives talking about Obama. You auctually have to get people to vote for your canidate. I am beginning to think Trump has a good chance because Hillary and company have not made a case to vote for Hillary. You know the under 35 vote is almost split even between Hillary, the 3rd party and Trump? Its Hillary's job to get those votes. She is failing because there is little difference between her and trump. Look at the unfavorable number one is at 62%, the other has 60%. When you talk about how bad the other person is all the time, you are not making a case for yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.
Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.
Being critical of her, or not liking her, does NOT mean you like or support Trump.
You have two choices. If you don't vote Clinton, you are supporting Trump. Actions speak louder than words.
This argument will not work for many of us who will not vote for Hillary and will not vote for Trump either.
There was ample evidence that many liberals found Hillary unacceptable as a candidate and yet she was foisted on us by her supporters.
Yes, that is how democracy works: she got more votes and won the nomination. Now some liberals and independents may choose not to vote for her or to vote for one of the third party candidates - which is also how a democracy works.
The electability of a candidate is an important factor when deciding who to vote for and that should have been given more emphasis when we were selecting a nominee.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.
Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.
Being critical of her, or not liking her, does NOT mean you like or support Trump.
You have two choices. If you don't vote Clinton, you are supporting Trump. Actions speak louder than words.
pp here.
No, it isn't support of Trump.
And yet that is the effect a third party vote will have, no matter how much you like to think your meaningless little protest will occur in a vacuum. I don't know if you're a man or white or how well off you are, but the fact is that if Trump wins, people who did not vote for Hillary are going to have a lot worse than the Bush years ever could have been on their conscience. That's not "bullying," sensitive sally, that's a fact. What kind of climate work would we have done under Gore vs Bush? How much less gerrymandering might have occurred? I actually doubt 9/11 would have unfolded as it did, not to mention the bizarro reaction of attacking two unrelated nations. But you do you, I guess. Go Stein.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.
Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.
Being critical of her, or not liking her, does NOT mean you like or support Trump.
You have two choices. If you don't vote Clinton, you are supporting Trump. Actions speak louder than words.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.
Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.
Being critical of her, or not liking her, does NOT mean you like or support Trump.
You have two choices. If you don't vote Clinton, you are supporting Trump. Actions speak louder than words.
These little scare tactics don't sway me and I plan to vote Stein. Hillary's Iraq War vote and years pro-intervention foriegn policy have convinced me she lacks the temperament to be President.
You seem like you do not support Trump, even though you do not want to vote for Hillary. What does voting Stein achieve? Do you think Stein can win the election? Are you okay risking the Supreme court pick or total lack of respect for environment by voting for Stein and implicitly voting against semi-liberal candidate?
People are allowed to vote for whomever they want. Stop behaving like a bully.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.
Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.
Being critical of her, or not liking her, does NOT mean you like or support Trump.
You have two choices. If you don't vote Clinton, you are supporting Trump. Actions speak louder than words.
pp here.
No, it isn't support of Trump.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.
Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.
Being critical of her, or not liking her, does NOT mean you like or support Trump.
You have two choices. If you don't vote Clinton, you are supporting Trump. Actions speak louder than words.
These little scare tactics don't sway me and I plan to vote Stein. Hillary's Iraq War vote and years pro-intervention foriegn policy have convinced me she lacks the temperament to be President.
You seem like you do not support Trump, even though you do not want to vote for Hillary. What does voting Stein achieve? Do you think Stein can win the election? Are you okay risking the Supreme court pick or total lack of respect for environment by voting for Stein and implicitly voting against semi-liberal candidate?
People are allowed to vote for whomever they want. Stop behaving like a bully.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.
Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.
Being critical of her, or not liking her, does NOT mean you like or support Trump.
You have two choices. If you don't vote Clinton, you are supporting Trump. Actions speak louder than words.
These little scare tactics don't sway me and I plan to vote Stein. Hillary's Iraq War vote and years pro-intervention foriegn policy have convinced me she lacks the temperament to be President.
You seem like you do not support Trump, even though you do not want to vote for Hillary. What does voting Stein achieve? Do you think Stein can win the election? Are you okay risking the Supreme court pick or total lack of respect for environment by voting for Stein and implicitly voting against semi-liberal candidate?
Anonymous wrote:O'Hanlon is not even remotely objective when it comes to Hillary.
Google his name in conjunction with that of Clinton and you will see numerous articles that sing her praises and ignore her failures.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They don't want to get to know her, because that might challenge their deep misogyny.
Its just boggles my mind that many do not want to know Clinton, neither they want to truly understand Trump's despicable past, yet will claim Trump will save the world from the satanic Hillary.
Being critical of her, or not liking her, does NOT mean you like or support Trump.
You have two choices. If you don't vote Clinton, you are supporting Trump. Actions speak louder than words.
These little scare tactics don't sway me and I plan to vote Stein. Hillary's Iraq War vote and years pro-intervention foriegn policy have convinced me she lacks the temperament to be President.
You seem like you do not support Trump, even though you do not want to vote for Hillary. What does voting Stein achieve? Do you think Stein can win the election? Are you okay risking the Supreme court pick or total lack of respect for environment by voting for Stein and implicitly voting against semi-liberal candidate?