Anonymous wrote:Well, it would make sense to me that public school districts provide services to public school students. Why should tax payers fund services for students not in public school? Imagine how much more resources public school students could have if funds were not funneled into providing services to those NOT in public school!
Anonymous wrote:all of the other parents who have moved their kids to private school ... will just come galloping back to publuc schools.... [and] Take resources away from your kid,
it's weird that you're using your child's power to hoard public money for himself as a weapon to threaten people whose opinion you don't like.
you must be kidding?
No, no I'm not kidding. That's an entirely accurate restatement of PP's "warning."
all of the other parents who have moved their kids to private school ... will just come galloping back to publuc schools.... [and] Take resources away from your kid,
it's weird that you're using your child's power to hoard public money for himself as a weapon to threaten people whose opinion you don't like.
you must be kidding?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, it would make sense to me that public school districts provide services to public school students. Why should tax payers fund services for students not in public school? Imagine how much more resources public school students could have if funds were not funneled into providing services to those NOT in public school!
Because they're entitled to services under civil rights law. No matter, I predict more parents suing for non-public placements. You could have had it on the cheap and just paid for the services, but now you'll get to food the entire bill - tuition plus the services. Enjoy that.
They are entitled to some services under civil rights law - but the district can determine how to deliver them to students whose families opt out of public school.
Many do the 'consultative' approach DCPS is adopting and it's been tested legally. It may not feel right or fair to OP since the old approach was working for her child, but I would put my money into private services rather than a lawyer.
Wow your attitude makes me want to stop paying taxes to support public education. I realized because DCPS is so poorly run, parent feel they must fight for every cent at the cost of children with special needs but you are truly a despicable person.
I pay taxes and am a resident of DC and therefore my child is entitled to services. There are many families who don't get a preschool spot in the oversubscribed neighborhood schools and are unwilling to drive across the city to another under subscribed preschool program. (And there is only private for Pk3 WotP anyway!) Why should I be punished for sending my child to a private preschool program because it makes my life easier?! Regardless of the preschool, she is still a resident of DC and we pay taxes.
Anonymous wrote:Don't like it? I think there's a DCPS public school 'round the corner from you, OP. I bet your kid can get an IEP and on-campus services once you enroll your kid.
-- private school parent in the District[/quote
Fine, how about me and all of the other parents who have moved their kids to private school at their own expense, for their kids own safety and development will just come galloping back to publuc schools. What do you think that will do? Take resources away from your kid, you delf rightous ass.
]Read a little more carefully. I said I am a private school parent.
That said, it's weird that you're using your child's power to hoard public money for himself as a weapon to threaten people whose opinion you don't like.
"Watch out! We're comin' for you and my my kid is gonna take shit away from your kid!" That's essentially your elegant threat.
you must be kidding?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, it would make sense to me that public school districts provide services to public school students. Why should tax payers fund services for students not in public school? Imagine how much more resources public school students could have if funds were not funneled into providing services to those NOT in public school!
Because they're entitled to services under civil rights law. No matter, I predict more parents suing for non-public placements. You could have had it on the cheap and just paid for the services, but now you'll get to food the entire bill - tuition plus the services. Enjoy that.
They are entitled to some services under civil rights law - but the district can determine how to deliver them to students whose families opt out of public school.
Many do the 'consultative' approach DCPS is adopting and it's been tested legally. It may not feel right or fair to OP since the old approach was working for her child, but I would put my money into private services rather than a lawyer.
Don't like it? I think there's a DCPS public school 'round the corner from you, OP. I bet your kid can get an IEP and on-campus services once you enroll your kid.
-- private school parent in the District[/quote
Fine, how about me and all of the other parents who have moved their kids to private school at their own expense, for their kids own safety and development will just come galloping back to publuc schools. What do you think that will do? Take resources away from your kid, you delf rightous ass.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't like it? I think there's a DCPS public school 'round the corner from you, OP. I bet your kid can get an IEP and on-campus services once you enroll your kid.
-- private school parent in the District[/quote
Fine, how about me and all of the other parents who have moved their kids to private school at their own expense, for their kids own safety and development will just come galloping back to publuc schools. What do you think that will do? Take resources away from your kid, you delf rightous ass.
Read a little more carefully. I said I am a private school parent.
That said, it's weird that you're using your child's power to hoard public money for himself as a weapon to threaten people whose opinion you don't like.
"Watch out! We're comin' for you and my my kid is gonna take shit away from your kid!" That's essentially your elegant threat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, it would make sense to me that public school districts provide services to public school students. Why should tax payers fund services for students not in public school? Imagine how much more resources public school students could have if funds were not funneled into providing services to those NOT in public school!
Because they're entitled to services under civil rights law. No matter, I predict more parents suing for non-public placements. You could have had it on the cheap and just paid for the services, but now you'll get to food the entire bill - tuition plus the services. Enjoy that.
Anonymous wrote:Well, it would make sense to me that public school districts provide services to public school students. Why should tax payers fund services for students not in public school? Imagine how much more resources public school students could have if funds were not funneled into providing services to those NOT in public school!