I think as I've gotten older I've gotten a lot more respect for the free market as the best means of figuring out solutions to problems, but also a lot more appreciation for the need to have good rules of the road for the market, and the fact that markets are still imperfect. The net result doesn't leave me noticeably more liberal or conservative.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What you're describing is pretty common. Unfortunately, it often comes from an "I got mine" mentality that prioritizes the aging population to the detriment of the whole (think, for Social Security spending but against early education spending). I don't know you or your beliefs, but I'd urge anybody in your situation to make sure changing views are not purely self-interested or short-sighted.
- grew up in a town without a high school because the graying population bulldozed it rather than pay property taxes to fund it
I think it more about life experience bring more wisdom to your decisions and thought processes.
What "wisdom" is there in demolishing a school?
High school students benefit from attending a larger high school with more classes, resources, clubs and opportunities. A small town with few families with school aged children is not going to be able to offer the same type of educational opportunities as a high school that is fed by several small towns.
I'm the person without the HS, and this is what I mean by short sighted. Now those older folks want to sell their homes (or their estate does) but young families don't want to buy into the district because their kids will be bussed to a large crowded school. This is a town of 25K people btw, not a village.
Not trying to derail the thread, but this is just such a great micro example of trying to justify something that benefits one group immediately but screws everybody in the end.
This is exactly what's happening in my hometown. Older boomers, many of whom are staying put in their tacky, overbuilt McMansions, are convinced the flattening property values and the lingering of homes on the market are a symptom of some sort of left-wing substainability initiative conspiracy (yes I've heard that phrase actually come out of someone's mouth). Meanwhile, the taxes are absurdly high but the schools have been stripped of resources and consolidated so that the one elementary school (used to be three) is not near the desireable residential areas. Even the recreation facility have been stripped of resources and many of the baseball and soccer field and parks where I used to play as a kid have been closed. Families now have to join really expensive private leagues for any activities for younger kids. It's so obvious to young people why it's not a desireable place anymore. I'm a little sad for it and I'd be sad for my parents and what will happen if they ever sell their home, but they didn't want to pay for anything they didn't personally use so that's what happens.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What you're describing is pretty common. Unfortunately, it often comes from an "I got mine" mentality that prioritizes the aging population to the detriment of the whole (think, for Social Security spending but against early education spending). I don't know you or your beliefs, but I'd urge anybody in your situation to make sure changing views are not purely self-interested or short-sighted.
- grew up in a town without a high school because the graying population bulldozed it rather than pay property taxes to fund it
I don't see it as "I got mine" mentality. It's more of an "I worked for mine, why don't you work for yours" mentality.
Overestimating your own efforts and underestimating the efforts of those around you is an almost unavoidable cognitive bias, since you inevitably have more information about your experience. Did you build present day society from single-called organisms? No. Then you have a lot of other people to be grateful to and a lot of investment in society that made it possible for you to work for yours. It's disgusting how easy it is for some people to forget this.
You must be a Burnie supporter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What you're describing is pretty common. Unfortunately, it often comes from an "I got mine" mentality that prioritizes the aging population to the detriment of the whole (think, for Social Security spending but against early education spending). I don't know you or your beliefs, but I'd urge anybody in your situation to make sure changing views are not purely self-interested or short-sighted.
- grew up in a town without a high school because the graying population bulldozed it rather than pay property taxes to fund it
I think it more about life experience bring more wisdom to your decisions and thought processes.
What "wisdom" is there in demolishing a school?
High school students benefit from attending a larger high school with more classes, resources, clubs and opportunities. A small town with few families with school aged children is not going to be able to offer the same type of educational opportunities as a high school that is fed by several small towns.
I'm the person without the HS, and this is what I mean by short sighted. Now those older folks want to sell their homes (or their estate does) but young families don't want to buy into the district because their kids will be bussed to a large crowded school. This is a town of 25K people btw, not a village.
Not trying to derail the thread, but this is just such a great micro example of trying to justify something that benefits one group immediately but screws everybody in the end.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What you're describing is pretty common. Unfortunately, it often comes from an "I got mine" mentality that prioritizes the aging population to the detriment of the whole (think, for Social Security spending but against early education spending). I don't know you or your beliefs, but I'd urge anybody in your situation to make sure changing views are not purely self-interested or short-sighted.
- grew up in a town without a high school because the graying population bulldozed it rather than pay property taxes to fund it
I don't see it as "I got mine" mentality. It's more of an "I worked for mine, why don't you work for yours" mentality.
Overestimating your own efforts and underestimating the efforts of those around you is an almost unavoidable cognitive bias, since you inevitably have more information about your experience. Did you build present day society from single-called organisms? No. Then you have a lot of other people to be grateful to and a lot of investment in society that made it possible for you to work for yours. It's disgusting how easy it is for some people to forget this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What you're describing is pretty common. Unfortunately, it often comes from an "I got mine" mentality that prioritizes the aging population to the detriment of the whole (think, for Social Security spending but against early education spending). I don't know you or your beliefs, but I'd urge anybody in your situation to make sure changing views are not purely self-interested or short-sighted.
- grew up in a town without a high school because the graying population bulldozed it rather than pay property taxes to fund it
I don't see it as "I got mine" mentality. It's more of an "I worked for mine, why don't you work for yours" mentality.
Anonymous wrote:I think you're more ideological when you're younger. My DH and I both used to be Republicans and saw the world in absolute terms - no work = no welfare, pull yourself up by your bootstraps, etc. Not overly concerned about social issues like gay rights or abortion. Now that we're in our 50s and we realize just how life can bite anyone in the a$$ and look around at the financial mess our country is in and the hate spewing from the right, we now call ourselves socialists. But part of it is that we consider ourselves the Christian Left. Not only has our party been cooped by big business and hatred, so, does it seem, has much of our religion.
Anonymous wrote:I think you're more ideological when you're younger. My DH and I both used to be Republicans and saw the world in absolute terms - no work = no welfare, pull yourself up by your bootstraps, etc. Not overly concerned about social issues like gay rights or abortion. Now that we're in our 50s and we realize just how life can bite anyone in the a$$ and look around at the financial mess our country is in and the hate spewing from the right, we now call ourselves socialists. But part of it is that we consider ourselves the Christian Left. Not only has our party been cooped by big business and hatred, so, does it seem, has much of our religion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What you're describing is pretty common. Unfortunately, it often comes from an "I got mine" mentality that prioritizes the aging population to the detriment of the whole (think, for Social Security spending but against early education spending). I don't know you or your beliefs, but I'd urge anybody in your situation to make sure changing views are not purely self-interested or short-sighted.
- grew up in a town without a high school because the graying population bulldozed it rather than pay property taxes to fund it
I don't see it as "I got mine" mentality. It's more of an "I worked for mine, why don't you work for yours" mentality.
Anonymous wrote:
"A man who has not been a socialist before 25 has no heart. If he remains one after 25 he has no head."
—attributed to King Oscar II of Sweden