Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:PP, this is outdated talk. We are running out money fast, and China's growth is artificially propped by the Chinese Communists, so we know it will come down with a loud bang. Who will pay for the party then?
Funny thing, where do you think Europe will "seek leadership"? Genuinely curious who are the contenders

I don't know. Maybe we'll return to the individual nation states pre WW1...[/quote
How poorly educated are you? From the destruction of the Spanish Armada until ww1 the UK was the undisputed leader of the free world. Ww1 & the boer war was Germany trying to gain power. You have heard of the British Empire- you know the one that the sun never set on? Unlike other European colonial powers, the Brits worked with their territories, thus leaving a lot of them better off & still eager to be in the commonwealth. Russia can never be the leader of a 'free' world not can China b/c those nations aren't technically free. The EU will actually become more powerful, it also depends on how skillfully congress limits trump- if they are as good as they were with Obama we have nothing to worry about. This country is becoming more liberal, net migration will end & white people who are uncomfortable will keep moving away from urban centers & becoming more & more disenfranchised while those who are fine will have to actually work super hard b/c the US won't be benifitting from the developing worlds brain drain anymore.