Anonymous wrote:DH wants kids ASAP. I want to wait 6 months to a year before I get pregnant. I am really loving my independence and job and being a fabulous 35 year old. Is that a huge mistake? Will I look back one day and wish I had done it sooner? I'm not a huge kid person and while I do want them, I'm just can't get that excited about it.
Anonymous wrote:
In my book, the only time to have a baby is when you can't NOT have a baby. You need to be fully onboard. Take the year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you want more than one -- then time to get started. You are already considered "advanced maternal age" by doctors and will require all sorts of extra tests during your pregnancy. It could take 6 months to get pregnant (if all goes well, no miscarriage, etc.), then 9 months before you deliver, and it will take at least 6 months before you could start trying for a 2nd. Your odds of a successful pregnancy drop 15% every year from 35 onwards. Get to it!
Source? This would mean that every child born to a 42-year-old is a miracle of science ...
Not the PP, but here's a graph.
So, if she waits a year, she goes from an 18% chance per month to a 17% chance at age 36. At age 20 she only had a 20% chance, per this chart. And OP has frozen embryos. She has this time, but if after whatever agreed-upon 6-months-to-a-year period she's still hemming and hawing, then she and her husband need to make some big decisions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you want more than one -- then time to get started. You are already considered "advanced maternal age" by doctors and will require all sorts of extra tests during your pregnancy. It could take 6 months to get pregnant (if all goes well, no miscarriage, etc.), then 9 months before you deliver, and it will take at least 6 months before you could start trying for a 2nd. Your odds of a successful pregnancy drop 15% every year from 35 onwards. Get to it!
Source? This would mean that every child born to a 42-year-old is a miracle of science ...
Not the PP, but here's a graph.