Anonymous
Post 07/28/2016 10:42     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Why is this site a magnet for the tin-foil hat brigade?
Anonymous
Post 07/28/2016 10:35     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Love him or hate him, Trump is truly a sign of the times. During times of upheaval such as war or economic instability, people will tend to vote on the 1 or 2 issues they deem critical to their very survival.

Economic economic instability and war Clinton was around for and suported. No one can really make any accomplishments at SoS. Fox News asked a bunch of voters and there were twelve different answers including Benghazi! She voted for Iraq and isnfindedmby Goldman-Sachs, the people responsible for the crash.


+1
MikeL
Post 07/28/2016 10:00     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Stoddert shows betting odds on Clinton increased nearly 1% in just the last 24 hours. Seems Trump's convention bounce is fading rapidly.
https://electionbettingodds.com/


Not likely, she hasn't spoken yet and when she finally does - after 236 days of no press conference - she'll offer the same platitudes and talking points people are tired of hearing. She'll get a small bounce, but the angry Bernie contingent and lack of enthusiasm of the Democrat base will mitigate any bounce. She has issues with white makes, white young females and younger voters. She's finished

So, you want to take the bet?
jsteele
Post 07/28/2016 09:52     Subject: Re:July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Anonymous wrote:Rasmussen reports that Clinton has a lead of 1 - 43/42 -over Trump in the latest poll.

I guess liberals who bad mouth Rasmussen will now have a change of heart and rate the poll very highly!


We have always been at war with Rasmussen. No, no. We have always been at war with Gallup.

Rasmussen is the best pollster ever. Who would suggest otherwise?

Anonymous
Post 07/28/2016 09:48     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Anonymous wrote:Love him or hate him, Trump is truly a sign of the times. During times of upheaval such as war or economic instability, people will tend to vote on the 1 or 2 issues they deem critical to their very survival.


so true! And that's why the white supremacists are supporting him.

We have only ourselves to blame.
Anonymous
Post 07/28/2016 09:45     Subject: Re:July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Rasmussen reports that Clinton has a lead of 1 - 43/42 -over Trump in the latest poll.

I guess liberals who bad mouth Rasmussen will now have a change of heart and rate the poll very highly!
Anonymous
Post 07/28/2016 09:05     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Gee, with a huge lead like this, it would be really pretty embarrassing if Trump and the Republicans don't win the election in November, don't you agree? They've clearly got the upper hand now, so it's a no brainer they'll win. If they lose, it must signal a major failing of the Republican brand and a complete rejection of all the policies Trump is pitching, right?

So, given Trump's huge lead, which of you Trump supporters is brave enough to bet on the outcome? If Trump loses, you agree to complete exile from DCUM politics for one year.

This should be a no brainer for you, since you're so convinced Trump will win. Who's brave enough to take the bet?


Personally? I believe that Hillary will win because there is no end to cheating re: voting by Democrats. I plan on volunteering for True the Vote, so at least some of it hits the papers. And I plan to use whatever recording devices I have to get that information out there.

If Hillary is deemed unelectable, I expect a last-minute substitution by Dems.

I don't believe this group of Democrats want the people to have a voice. And I also believe there's a group of Republicans that feel the same (Paul Ryan, I'm looking at you).


So in other words, brave enough to shoot your mouth off, but not brave enough to put anything on the outcome. I see ....

Typical Trumpeter: all hat, no cattle.
Anonymous
Post 07/28/2016 08:57     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Gee, with a huge lead like this, it would be really pretty embarrassing if Trump and the Republicans don't win the election in November, don't you agree? They've clearly got the upper hand now, so it's a no brainer they'll win. If they lose, it must signal a major failing of the Republican brand and a complete rejection of all the policies Trump is pitching, right?

So, given Trump's huge lead, which of you Trump supporters is brave enough to bet on the outcome? If Trump loses, you agree to complete exile from DCUM politics for one year.

This should be a no brainer for you, since you're so convinced Trump will win. Who's brave enough to take the bet?


Personally? I believe that Hillary will win because there is no end to cheating re: voting by Democrats. I plan on volunteering for True the Vote, so at least some of it hits the papers. And I plan to use whatever recording devices I have to get that information out there.

If Hillary is deemed unelectable, I expect a last-minute substitution by Dems.

I don't believe this group of Democrats want the people to have a voice. And I also believe there's a group of Republicans that feel the same (Paul Ryan, I'm looking at you).


So in other words, brave enough to shoot your mouth off, but not brave enough to put anything on the outcome. I see ....
Anonymous
Post 07/28/2016 07:32     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Anonymous wrote:Stoddert shows betting odds on Clinton increased nearly 1% in just the last 24 hours. Seems Trump's convention bounce is fading rapidly.
https://electionbettingodds.com/

So you think Hillary will not get a bounce from her convention?
Anonymous
Post 07/28/2016 07:30     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Anonymous wrote:Stoddert shows betting odds on Clinton increased nearly 1% in just the last 24 hours. Seems Trump's convention bounce is fading rapidly.
https://electionbettingodds.com/


Nearly 1%? Wow! I guess the election is pretty much over. If it were nearly 2%, we'd be talking landslide!
Anonymous
Post 07/28/2016 07:27     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Anonymous wrote:Gee, with a huge lead like this, it would be really pretty embarrassing if Trump and the Republicans don't win the election in November, don't you agree? They've clearly got the upper hand now, so it's a no brainer they'll win. If they lose, it must signal a major failing of the Republican brand and a complete rejection of all the policies Trump is pitching, right?

So, given Trump's huge lead, which of you Trump supporters is brave enough to bet on the outcome? If Trump loses, you agree to complete exile from DCUM politics for one year.

This should be a no brainer for you, since you're so convinced Trump will win. Who's brave enough to take the bet?


Personally? I believe that Hillary will win because there is no end to cheating re: voting by Democrats. I plan on volunteering for True the Vote, so at least some of it hits the papers. And I plan to use whatever recording devices I have to get that information out there.

If Hillary is deemed unelectable, I expect a last-minute substitution by Dems.

I don't believe this group of Democrats want the people to have a voice. And I also believe there's a group of Republicans that feel the same (Paul Ryan, I'm looking at you).
Anonymous
Post 07/28/2016 07:18     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Anonymous wrote:Love him or hate him, Trump is truly a sign of the times. During times of upheaval such as war or economic instability, people will tend to vote on the 1 or 2 issues they deem critical to their very survival.

Economic economic instability and war Clinton was around for and suported. No one can really make any accomplishments at SoS. Fox News asked a bunch of voters and there were twelve different answers including Benghazi! She voted for Iraq and isnfindedmby Goldman-Sachs, the people responsible for the crash.
Anonymous
Post 07/28/2016 07:15     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Anonymous wrote:Stoddert shows betting odds on Clinton increased nearly 1% in just the last 24 hours. Seems Trump's convention bounce is fading rapidly.
https://electionbettingodds.com/


Not likely, she hasn't spoken yet and when she finally does - after 236 days of no press conference - she'll offer the same platitudes and talking points people are tired of hearing. She'll get a small bounce, but the angry Bernie contingent and lack of enthusiasm of the Democrat base will mitigate any bounce. She has issues with white makes, white young females and younger voters. She's finished
Anonymous
Post 07/28/2016 06:37     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Stoddert shows betting odds on Clinton increased nearly 1% in just the last 24 hours. Seems Trump's convention bounce is fading rapidly.
https://electionbettingodds.com/
Anonymous
Post 07/27/2016 22:45     Subject: July 26 LA Times Tracking Trump 47 Hillary 40
Love him or hate him, Trump is truly a sign of the times. During times of upheaval such as war or economic instability, people will tend to vote on the 1 or 2 issues they deem critical to their very survival.