I bet the real nail in the coffin will happen right in October because it wouldn't allow enough time for another dem candidate

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump's wet dream must be that hacked emails will surface that Clinton and/or her campaign were in cahoots with DWS and the DNC to rig the primaries against Bernie!

Donna Brazille has been saying in interviews that there is more to come without being specific. She was the vice chair of the DNC and now the interim chair after the DWS resignation, so I assume her comments are not just idle speculation.

A few weeks ago Wikileaks said they had emails from Clinton that would indict her.
My thought is that it had something to do with the Clinton Foundation and a conflict of interest with her role as SoS.
Who knows what they have. I really didn’t believe it at the time, but now.... who knows.

So did the government, but tey declined to do so thanks to her buddies in the White House.

Plus they haven't released those emails yet. Wiki leaks said they will release them soon

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am a pretty staunch conservative, not a Bernie fan, but what they did to him is horrendous! The man might not share my values, but I can say that he is honest and passionate in his views, and I admire those things about him. He tried to run a fair campaign against some of the most dishonest people in the country.

If nothing else, I hope his run for presidency shakes up the system and forces necessary changes.

+1

I know it's a just A small sample size but I work with a lot of Bernie supporters. Everything the one of them is angry at what Bernie did, he should have donated that money to charity. I disagreed with Bernie I don't want to Key issues but I respected him. I do not respect him anymore

Anonymous wrote:I think many of the posts on this thread are written by a single person responding to him/herself. Jeff, is that true and if so, allowed?

I haven't noticed posters responding to themselves -- I'd definitely call that out -- but the are a couple of posters posting over and over again.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think many of the posts on this thread are written by a single person responding to him/herself. Jeff, is that true and if so, allowed?

Hmm.... Hard to believe there are this many people who are not Hillary supporters, huh?

. Yes that's a little surprising, but there is a sameness to the rhetoric and turn-of-phrase that seems suspicious.

Oh, you know what?

I think I am not as worried anymore. Don't be too gleeful, Trumpsters.

Bob Dole got a big bounce after the Republican convention, but quickly fizzled. However, Al Gore's 2000 bounce endured for weeks. Prior to the Democratic convention, Gore was behind Texas Gov. George W. Bush by as many as 16 points,[4] but was in a statistical tie with the Republican the weekend after his acceptance speech.[5][4] To the bafflement of political pundits, Democratic candidate John Kerry did not get a convention bounce in 2004,[6] despite the unpopularity of incumbent George W. Bush.

Polls indicated a small bounce for 2008 Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama after his party's convention in August,[7] but as expected, much of it evaporated during and after the Republican convention the week following, yielding GOP candidate John McCain a small lead in several polls.[8][9] Nielsen ratings revealed that year's party conventions to be the most-watched ever, with the Republican convention narrowly trumping the Democrats'.[10]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think many of the posts on this thread are written by a single person responding to him/herself. Jeff, is that true and if so, allowed?

Hmm.... Hard to believe there are this many people who are not Hillary supporters, huh?

Exactly. Probably 2 or 3 posters on each side who post more than your average poster.

Anonymous wrote:I think many of the posts on this thread are written by a single person responding to him/herself. Jeff, is that true and if so, allowed?

Tin foil hat alert..

Anonymous wrote:Question: does the post convention bounce apply to the DNC or just the RNC?

Only time will tell, but things aren't looking good so far.

Both Independents are sheep they will go back to Hillary

This election is going to come down to third party

Who is Johnson taking votes from and if Stein stays she might throw it to Trump just like 2000 and Nader

Anonymous wrote:I am a pretty staunch conservative, not a Bernie fan, but what they did to him is horrendous! The man might not share my values, but I can say that he is honest and passionate in his views, and I admire those things about him. He tried to run a fair campaign against some of the most dishonest people in the country.

If nothing else, I hope his run for presidency shakes up the system and forces necessary changes.

+1

Question: does the post convention bounce apply to the DNC or just the RNC?

Anonymous wrote:I think many of the posts on this thread are written by a single person responding to him/herself. Jeff, is that true and if so, allowed?

Hmm.... Hard to believe there are this many people who are not Hillary supporters, huh?

Can we have a do over? Maybe Rubio or pence versus this Caine guy?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump's wet dream must be that hacked emails will surface that Clinton and/or her campaign were in cahoots with DWS and the DNC to rig the primaries against Bernie!

Donna Brazille has been saying in interviews that there is more to come without being specific. She was the vice chair of the DNC and now the interim chair after the DWS resignation, so I assume her comments are not just idle speculation.

A few weeks ago Wikileaks said they had emails from Clinton that would indict her.
My thought is that it had something to do with the Clinton Foundation and a conflict of interest with her role as SoS.
Who knows what they have. I really didn’t believe it at the time, but now.... who knows.

So did the government, but tey declined to do so thanks to her buddies in the White House.