Anonymous wrote:
Actually, it's extremely hard for certain adults to learn to swim. My mother did not learn to swim as a child and she tried many different times, with many different instructors, as an adult, and was just not able to learn. As a result, she made sure that all of her kids became good, strong swimmers, because she knew she could never save us. We also never swam unless a life guard was present.
Anonymous wrote:Swim team is more fun than lessons and will teach your kids quickly and for less money. Sign up next year!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"I don't swim". What you mean is "I can't swim".
Why? Because I wouldn't get my fat ass off the couch when I was eight to go to lessons.
This is uncalled for. The most common reasons are socio-economic, not laziness. Maybe OP's family didn't have the means or access to swimming lessons. OP is providing lessons for her own children. Good for her/him.
Anonymous wrote:"I don't swim". What you mean is "I can't swim".
Why? Because I wouldn't get my fat ass off the couch when I was eight to go to lessons.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thank you for your concern. They know how to swim; so I'm watching out for them getting tired or a cramp or something. Once, one got tired and I threw him a pole. Otherwise all has been fine. Yes, I would feel comfortable relying on a lifeguard to jump in the deep end if need be.Anonymous wrote:How do you watch them if you can't swim? Do you rely on others to jump in the deep end if sth were to happen?
But how are you going to supervise in the ocean? Unless you never go to the beach.
Or at a hotel pool where there isn't a lifeguard? There are lots of times you'll be around water without a lifeguard. Learn to swim. It's not that hard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They want to stop. I want them to keep going, but I'm wondering if I'm holding them up to a silly standard. Answers seem all over the place!Anonymous wrote:Do they want to stop or you don't want to due to cost/transportation? I'd keep going.
For example, one can kick himself across but his face is in the water so he treads water if he needs to breathe mid-way. I told him he needs to keep going with lessons so he gets the stroke and breathing; that's not good enough. He says it shouldn't matter because he can pass the pool test cited above and because all he likes to do is jump in and get back out over and over. I'm going to make him keep going, but I want to give him a goal for when he can stop.
Former lifeguard here. I think it varies. They don't need to know how to do backstroke, breast stroke and a perfect freestyle to be good swimmers. I don't think doggy paddle is good swimming and they should be able to swim stronger than just that stroke (ie not a perfect freestyle but face in the water, turning head to breath) would be better. Strength will come with age and practice.
I think they should be able to swim confidently across a full length pool without breaks and be able to tread water.
If you are used to going to the same pool every day would they be confident swimmers in a new pool environment (bigger pool, deeper pool, etc.)
I think as a parent, you want to be confident that if they go to your local pool, a neighbor's pool, a hotel pool, lake, etc. they can swim confidently and safely. I want to know that if faced with a body of water they can get themselves to safety. If we were going to the ocean soon, I would keep up lessons even longer since that requires an even stronger swimmer.