Anonymous wrote:So on the college counselor point and hiring an outside consultant--here are two posts from the college admission board I just saw. So hiring a counselor seems rationale.
Anonymous
I think you need to be mindful of the difficult role the college counselors face. A very large chunk of the class is made up of high achievers, many or most of whom have highly educated parents. Given the competition faced by students, placement has the potential to be a nightmare. As a result, I think there is a surprising amount of "under-selling" that goes on. Although it worked out very well for our DD in the end, we were surprise at how low the counselor was shooting, in terms of characterizing what were match schools and what were reach schools. Even where naviance showed our daughter had higher/much higher scores than prior admitted students, the counselor saw virtually everything on her list as a reach (or very high reach). Other parents commented on the same phenomena. I don't fault them for managing expectations of course, but I do think the vested interest in avoiding disappointment can manifest itself in problematic ways.
[Report Post]
[Post New]07/14/2016 12:58
Subject: What do I need to know about College Placement from Private School
[Up]
Anonymous
You have to be knowledgeable and very hands on in selecting and applying to colleges. At our DD's big three the only weak link is college counseling. The turnover rate is high but keeps missing the worst employee. They are like realtors who want you to sell low so they can be done without effort. They suggest lowball offers then promise the moon in the same breath. It's apparent that they really have no clue. Take control and stay involved unless you only want some tiny ridiculous LAS from the beginning.
Anonymous wrote:The Sidwell Dartmouth number (6) is correct and they are matriculations not acceptances.
Anonymous wrote:"Sidwell does not publish its results, so you have to rely on parent reports. There were at least six accepted to Harvard, five to Yale, 10 to Chicago, six to Dartmouth, four to Brown, three to Princeton, three to Penn, three to Stanford, and one or two to Columbia."
Above copied from another thread. (not mine) It jives with what my kid reports. Also three to Cornell. My kid says all of these are matriculations except two that are double listed he thinks. He is going to one of these ivies and knows all the kids entering with him. They are happy to be going together, although one may take a gap year.
So it was a typical year for Sidwell. Not 10 to Yale like 2015. Also despite the comments above several 2015 Sidwell graduates are enjoying Chicago and doing very well there, which may have contributed to their acceptance of 10 from Sidwell.
Anonymous wrote:"Sidwell does not publish its results, so you have to rely on parent reports. There were at least six accepted to Harvard, five to Yale, 10 to Chicago, six to Dartmouth, four to Brown, three to Princeton, three to Penn, three to Stanford, and one or two to Columbia."
Above copied from another thread. (not mine) It jives with what my kid reports. Also three to Cornell. My kid says all of these are matriculations except two that are double listed he thinks. He is going to one of these ivies and knows all the kids entering with him. They are happy to be going together, although one may take a gap year.
So it was a typical year for Sidwell. Not 10 to Yale like 2015. Also despite the comments above several 2015 Sidwell graduates are enjoying Chicago and doing very well there, which may have contributed to their acceptance of 10 from Sidwell.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can find the parent reported Sidwell data elsewhere in DCUM. Sidwell does not release this info. They did fine this year. At least 20 to ivies, several to Stanford, and 10 to University of Chicago, I think.
10 to Chicago? That can't be right. Not only is it a tough school to get into, but most kids from this area don't want to go there (miserable place). Your numbers have to be off.
Yep +1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You can find the parent reported Sidwell data elsewhere in DCUM. Sidwell does not release this info. They did fine this year. At least 20 to ivies, several to Stanford, and 10 to University of Chicago, I think.
10 to Chicago? That can't be right. Not only is it a tough school to get into, but most kids from this area don't want to go there (miserable place). Your numbers have to be off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Different poster. The numbers are fairly on target. The Chicago popularity has to do with the number of prior year graduates reporting back on how happy they are. I'm guessing that being prepared for that level of rigor and faculty attention probably helped them have the time to have fun! Admittedly miserable weather but great city. And it is a tough school to get into. This was a really strong academic class and many good writers which I imagined helped with those unusual essays.
Oh come on! Who at Chicago has ever had fun?
Kids who like learning and a challenge. Virtues to be celebrated in this increasingly intellectually flabby country.
That's not fun! That's also not really undergraduate life at Chicago either.
I also agree with PP that, if Sidwell had 20 go to Ivies, 10 at Chicago seems off. An earlier poster had a link to GDS's numbers from last year and GDS had 20 go to Ivies and 2 or 3 go to Chicago, which make more sense---that Chicago would attract about what an average Ivy would.
But bottomline is that everything about Chicago for an undergrad is miserable (and it's in a great city, but sits in truly awful Hyde Park, which is far, far away from any place that any 18 year old actually wants to be.
Funny how some of the smartest kids in the country, year after year chose to go to a place that is so miserable.
And the number is right.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Different poster. The numbers are fairly on target. The Chicago popularity has to do with the number of prior year graduates reporting back on how happy they are. I'm guessing that being prepared for that level of rigor and faculty attention probably helped them have the time to have fun! Admittedly miserable weather but great city. And it is a tough school to get into. This was a really strong academic class and many good writers which I imagined helped with those unusual essays.
Oh come on! Who at Chicago has ever had fun?
Kids who like learning and a challenge. Virtues to be celebrated in this increasingly intellectually flabby country.
That's not fun! That's also not really undergraduate life at Chicago either.
I also agree with PP that, if Sidwell had 20 go to Ivies, 10 at Chicago seems off. An earlier poster had a link to GDS's numbers from last year and GDS had 20 go to Ivies and 2 or 3 go to Chicago, which make more sense---that Chicago would attract about what an average Ivy would.
But bottomline is that everything about Chicago for an undergrad is miserable (and it's in a great city, but sits in truly awful Hyde Park, which is far, far away from any place that any 18 year old actually wants to be.