Anonymous wrote:https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/06/23/an-alleged-sexual-assault-fuels-rumors-that-turn-an-idaho-town-against-muslim-refugees/?tid=sm_fb

Hey Jeff, good moderating! It was all bullshit

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again, the article in the Idahoan used the word 'rape'. The police are now stating she was not raped. The laws in Idaho define rape as penetration with a penis. So assault it is. Again, she is five years old. F-I-V-E. There is video. The boys are in custody. Something bad clearly happened to that little girl.

Regarding your post, it said it was edited because I changed the subject line which was factually incorrect.

The police never said there was a rape. A reporter used that word. Even this evening you are suggesting there was a rape. You don't even know if the assault was sexual. The police said that the older boy didn't touch the girl. The youngest boy was not detained. That leaves the 10 year old. I understand that something very inappropriate (at the least) happened between the 10 year boy and the 5 year old girl. I don't know what that was and neither do you.

Here is something else that was in the article to which you linked:

"There is a small group of people in Twin Falls County whose life goal is to eliminate refugees, and thus far they have not been constrained by the truth," Loebs said. "They have not been constrained by the truth in the past, and I don't expect them to be constrained by the truth in the future."

These are the folks feeding Breitbart and then on to you. Then, you post here only because the children are Muslim immigrants.

Read this story about child abuse in the Hasidic community:

http://www.newsweek.com/2016/03/11/child-abuse-allegations-hasidic-ultraorthodox-jewish-community-brooklyn-432688.html

Or this story of a Jewish man charged with sexual assault of a teen:

http://www.timesofisrael.com/jewish-man-held-in-sexual-assault-of-teen-gifted-to-him/

Have you ever posted about these incidents? No, we both know you haven't. But, how would you feel about a poster who continually posted story after story about Jews committing sexual assault? That's pretty much how I feel about you.

Anonymous wrote:Again, the article in the Idahoan used the word 'rape'. The police are now stating she was not raped. The laws in Idaho define rape as penetration with a penis. So assault it is. Again, she is five years old. F-I-V-E. There is video. The boys are in custody. Something bad clearly happened to that little girl.

"There is a small group of people in Twin Falls County whose life goal is to eliminate refugees, and thus far they have not been constrained by the truth," Loebs said. "They have not been constrained by the truth in the past, and I don't expect them to be constrained by the truth in the future."

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems Breitbart's account was correct. From the Idaho Stateman:

An incident did occur, Loebs said, and two juveniles have been charged after authorities obtained video shot on a cellphone. But the details of the case don’t match what’s being reported by anti-refugee groups, the prosecutor said.

According to those officials, three boys were involved, ages 7, 10 and 14, and the alleged victim was a 5-year-old girl. The boys are from Sudan and Iraq; none are Syrian. They are being held at a juvenile detention facility. Officials suspect the boys have been in the Uniteds States fewer than two years, but their refugee status wasn’t immediately clear to the police chief.

There were no adults involved, Loebs said, the boys didn’t have a knife, and the incident wasn’t a “gang-rape” instigated by the oldest boy.

“All those involved are juveniles, and the older one didn’t touch the victim in any way,” Loebs said. Only one person is alleged to have touched the victim, said the prosecutor, though he declined to elaborate.

Read more here: http://www.idahostatesman.com/news/state/idaho/article84829787.html#storylink=cpy


They further say what Snopes did, that there was no knife, no Syrians, etc, but again, that's NOT what Breitbart had down in their story either., nor was it in my post AT ALL.

Again, they would not be holding these kids if something significant did not take place.

I'm not denying that "something" took place. That was never the issue. The issue was your description of the incident which was and still is unsupported. Not to mention that these remain allegations and that your only interest was due to the involvement of Middle Eastern immigrants.

My beef is the fact that you linked the article I posted to the Snopes article, which was referencing a tweet and completely different articles, attributing it to the article I posted, and changing the title. Then when I pointed out it wasn't the same, you edited the thread to make it seem as if the article I posted was indeed the same.

Again, Breitbart had the facts correct. The Idahoan article linked in it used the word "rape". If you have a beef with the word, speak to them.

I did not edit the thread so stop lying about that. All that is known about this case is that a 10 year old touched a 5 year old in a manner that led to him being charged. How you have concluded that there is a rape is beyond me. There is a broad range of possible actions, not all of which are sexual.

Nevertheless, the families of the children have been evicted from their apartment. I hope you and the rest of the hysterical mob that have been whipped up by the lies spread throughout the Internet are happy that these families are being forced out of their homes.

Here is the sort of climate that exists there:

http://www.idahostatesman.com/news/local/article85221002.html

"In February, her younger son, 16, was assaulted in Downtown Boise. His assailant allegedly asked whether the boy was Muslim."

I bet that family of the guy who assaulted this teenager has not been kicked out of their home.

You are a contributor to this climate of hatred. I hope that you take a lot of pride what you are doing.

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems Breitbart's account was correct. From the Idaho Stateman:

An incident did occur, Loebs said, and two juveniles have been charged after authorities obtained video shot on a cellphone. But the details of the case don’t match what’s being reported by anti-refugee groups, the prosecutor said.

According to those officials, three boys were involved, ages 7, 10 and 14, and the alleged victim was a 5-year-old girl. The boys are from Sudan and Iraq; none are Syrian. They are being held at a juvenile detention facility. Officials suspect the boys have been in the Uniteds States fewer than two years, but their refugee status wasn’t immediately clear to the police chief.

There were no adults involved, Loebs said, the boys didn’t have a knife, and the incident wasn’t a “gang-rape” instigated by the oldest boy.

“All those involved are juveniles, and the older one didn’t touch the victim in any way,” Loebs said. Only one person is alleged to have touched the victim, said the prosecutor, though he declined to elaborate.

Read more here: http://www.idahostatesman.com/news/state/idaho/article84829787.html#storylink=cpy


They further say what Snopes did, that there was no knife, no Syrians, etc, but again, that's NOT what Breitbart had down in their story either., nor was it in my post AT ALL.

Again, they would not be holding these kids if something significant did not take place.

I'm not denying that "something" took place. That was never the issue. The issue was your description of the incident which was and still is unsupported. Not to mention that these remain allegations and that your only interest was due to the involvement of Middle Eastern immigrants.

My beef is the fact that you linked the article I posted to the Snopes article, which was referencing a tweet and completely different articles, attributing it to the article I posted, and changing the title. Then when I pointed out it wasn't the same, you edited the thread to make it seem as if the article I posted was indeed the same.

Again, Breitbart had the facts correct. The Idahoan article linked in it used the word "rape". If you have a beef with the word, speak to them.

I did not edit the thread so stop lying about that. All that is known about this case is that a 10 year old touched a 5 year old in a manner that led to him being charged. How you have concluded that there is a rape is beyond me. There is a broad range of possible actions, not all of which are sexual.

Nevertheless, the families of the children have been evicted from their apartment. I hope you and the rest of the hysterical mob that have been whipped up by the lies spread throughout the Internet are happy that these families are being forced out of their homes.

Here is the sort of climate that exists there:

http://www.idahostatesman.com/news/local/article85221002.html

"In February, her younger son, 16, was assaulted in Downtown Boise. His assailant allegedly asked whether the boy was Muslim."

I bet that family of the guy who assaulted this teenager has not been kicked out of their home.

You are a contributor to this climate of hatred. I hope that you take a lot of pride what you are doing.

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems Breitbart's account was correct. From the Idaho Stateman:

An incident did occur, Loebs said, and two juveniles have been charged after authorities obtained video shot on a cellphone. But the details of the case don’t match what’s being reported by anti-refugee groups, the prosecutor said.

According to those officials, three boys were involved, ages 7, 10 and 14, and the alleged victim was a 5-year-old girl. The boys are from Sudan and Iraq; none are Syrian. They are being held at a juvenile detention facility. Officials suspect the boys have been in the Uniteds States fewer than two years, but their refugee status wasn’t immediately clear to the police chief.

There were no adults involved, Loebs said, the boys didn’t have a knife, and the incident wasn’t a “gang-rape” instigated by the oldest boy.

“All those involved are juveniles, and the older one didn’t touch the victim in any way,” Loebs said. Only one person is alleged to have touched the victim, said the prosecutor, though he declined to elaborate.

Read more here: http://www.idahostatesman.com/news/state/idaho/article84829787.html#storylink=cpy


They further say what Snopes did, that there was no knife, no Syrians, etc, but again, that's NOT what Breitbart had down in their story either., nor was it in my post AT ALL.

Again, they would not be holding these kids if something significant did not take place.

I'm not denying that "something" took place. That was never the issue. The issue was your description of the incident which was and still is unsupported. Not to mention that these remain allegations and that your only interest was due to the involvement of Middle Eastern immigrants.

My beef is the fact that you linked the article I posted to the Snopes article, which was referencing a tweet and completely different articles, attributing it to the article I posted, and changing the title. Then when I pointed out it wasn't the same, you edited the thread to make it seem as if the article I posted was indeed the same.

Again, Breitbart had the facts correct. The Idahoan article linked in it used the word "rape". If you have a beef with the word, speak to them.

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Seems Breitbart's account was correct. From the Idaho Stateman:

An incident did occur, Loebs said, and two juveniles have been charged after authorities obtained video shot on a cellphone. But the details of the case don’t match what’s being reported by anti-refugee groups, the prosecutor said.

According to those officials, three boys were involved, ages 7, 10 and 14, and the alleged victim was a 5-year-old girl. The boys are from Sudan and Iraq; none are Syrian. They are being held at a juvenile detention facility. Officials suspect the boys have been in the Uniteds States fewer than two years, but their refugee status wasn’t immediately clear to the police chief.

There were no adults involved, Loebs said, the boys didn’t have a knife, and the incident wasn’t a “gang-rape” instigated by the oldest boy.

“All those involved are juveniles, and the older one didn’t touch the victim in any way,” Loebs said. Only one person is alleged to have touched the victim, said the prosecutor, though he declined to elaborate.

Read more here: http://www.idahostatesman.com/news/state/idaho/article84829787.html#storylink=cpy


They further say what Snopes did, that there was no knife, no Syrians, etc, but again, that's NOT what Breitbart had down in their story either., nor was it in my post AT ALL.

Again, they would not be holding these kids if something significant did not take place.

I'm not denying that "something" took place. That was never the issue. The issue was your description of the incident which was and still is unsupported. Not to mention that these remain allegations and that your only interest was due to the involvement of Middle Eastern immigrants.

jsteele wrote:Forgot to mention, even in this thread you were arguing that it was a rape. Do you really think a 7 or 10 year old raped someone?

Anonymous wrote:Seems Breitbart's account was correct. From the Idaho Stateman:

An incident did occur, Loebs said, and two juveniles have been charged after authorities obtained video shot on a cellphone. But the details of the case don’t match what’s being reported by anti-refugee groups, the prosecutor said.

According to those officials, three boys were involved, ages 7, 10 and 14, and the alleged victim was a 5-year-old girl. The boys are from Sudan and Iraq; none are Syrian. They are being held at a juvenile detention facility. Officials suspect the boys have been in the Uniteds States fewer than two years, but their refugee status wasn’t immediately clear to the police chief.

There were no adults involved, Loebs said, the boys didn’t have a knife, and the incident wasn’t a “gang-rape” instigated by the oldest boy.

“All those involved are juveniles, and the older one didn’t touch the victim in any way,” Loebs said. Only one person is alleged to have touched the victim, said the prosecutor, though he declined to elaborate.

Read more here: http://www.idahostatesman.com/news/state/idaho/article84829787.html#storylink=cpy


They further say what Snopes did, that there was no knife, no Syrians, etc, but again, that's NOT what Breitbart had down in their story either., nor was it in my post AT ALL.

Again, they would not be holding these kids if something significant did not take place.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff can you just block this OP from DCUM if she / he persists in the racial hate campaigns?

He can, but he will also have to block those that call conservatives racist, homophobe, Islamophobe mouth-breathers. Seems that's some serious hate as well. To be fair, of course.

No, he doesn't. The "why won't you tolerate our intolerance" canard doesn't play here.

Neither of you appear to be Jeff, the person to whom that question was directed.

He shouldn't even dignify your straw man question with a response.

I mean, seriously? "Oh, you liberals are so unaccepting of my desire to insult minorities and women. Your political correctness is impinging my free speech. Your hypocrites because you won't tolerate my intolerance." What a crock of shit. Sad thing is you probably even actually think that way.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jeff can you just block this OP from DCUM if she / he persists in the racial hate campaigns?

He can, but he will also have to block those that call conservatives racist, homophobe, Islamophobe mouth-breathers. Seems that's some serious hate as well. To be fair, of course.

No, he doesn't. The "why won't you tolerate our intolerance" canard doesn't play here.

Neither of you appear to be Jeff, the person to whom that question was directed.