Anonymous wrote:

Ok, thanks for clarifying that you hate them because they're unattractive women in positions of power. How dare they!

#1 I do not hate Clinton or Warren, I despise their political views, their lying, dishonesty, and utterly corrupt moral character. Being a woman has nothing to do with it although being ugly is another negative to add to the list.

I'd like to see a hot woman at least in the office. Trump's daughter is pretty hot.

What people who keep playing the misogyny card do not realize it is not about gender it is about political views. Every man has or had a mom, maybe sisters, and female relatives so this idea of hating women is absurd.

Clinton does not get to hide behind "woman" just as Obama should not get to hide behind "race" to dismiss valid and serious criticisms.

Make no mistake: if a Republican had tried to lie about being Native American the news media would be screaming on every front page. Native American protesters would appear on Capitol Hill DEMANDING the republican
step down, apologize, and grovel before the American people to atone for this great sin. But do we hear anything about it? Any protest? No, she gets a pass just as Clinton will get a pass for having a personal mail server
sending and receiving classified documents, a mail server that was designed to circumvent FOIA requests.

Had a Republican had such a server, again there would be headlines SCREAMING for that Republican to quit, to be tried in court and sentenced to a thousand years in prison for jeopardizing our national security.

Ok, thanks for clarifying that you hate them because they're unattractive women in positions of power. How dare they!

This may be why she has sympathy for Hillary - she knows how the right wing machine twists things.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I imagine your disgust for the two of them stems mainly from the fact that they are women?

Hag definition: An unattractive, middle-aged (or slightly older) woman. The term is commonly used to describe hysterical or ugly women in positions of power.

I see Warren and Clinton (in fact just about every liberal Democrat woman) to be unattractive, and ugly on the inside: they are despicable liars, untruthful, and unqualified morally to be trusted with any kind of political power.

Rush is right: Feminism was a means to allow ugly, unattractive women to gain political power.

More and more just as Obama played the "race card" to try and shut down criticism of his policies claiming the criticism is racist, so too will Clinton more and more play the "victim woman card" or the
"misogyny" card to try and shut down criticism.

Hopefully Trump will continue to call them out on it and heap ridicule upon them and keep hammering about their worthless policies and dishonesty. Whitewater, Paula Jones, the attacks on Clarence Thomas --all that dirty laundry needs to be brought out and aired to the public to show Clinton for what she is: a crooked Jezebel of a woman.

Hopefully she loses the election.

Ok, thanks for clarifying that you hate them because they're unattractive women in positions of power. How dare they!

Anonymous wrote:

Nice story bro. Charles Fried, the staunch conservative who hired her to HLS says you're wrong. And as someone who was taught by her, I can say she was one of the best profs there.

Why did Harvard list her as a Native American?

Nice story bro. Charles Fried, the staunch conservative who hired her to HLS says you're wrong. And as someone who was taught by her, I can say she was one of the best profs there.

Anonymous wrote:

Really? This shit again? When your candidate has pretended to be no less than 2 other people so he could talk about his sex life openly?

Not defending Trump. Cannot stand him. But, Warren has baggage, as well. She talks about income inequality--but look at her own background. She talks about the corrupt banks--but she made money off of foreclosed homes. She talks about the cost of college, but look at what she made at Harvard--for teaching very few classes. She talks about giving everyone a fair shake--yet she claimed minority status. (Look at Harvard law faculty--I went through three or four pages of them, and they ALL had been to Ivy schools. Yet, Warren did not. Odd. She was hired there about a year after she was identified as Native American.) She's a poseur. Yes, she is entertaining, bright, and personable. And a FRAUD.

Anonymous wrote:

I imagine your disgust for the two of them stems mainly from the fact that they are women?

Hag definition: An unattractive, middle-aged (or slightly older) woman. The term is commonly used to describe hysterical or ugly women in positions of power.

I see Warren and Clinton (in fact just about every liberal Democrat woman) to be unattractive, and ugly on the inside: they are despicable liars, untruthful, and unqualified morally to be trusted with any kind of political power.

Rush is right: Feminism was a means to allow ugly, unattractive women to gain political power.

More and more just as Obama played the "race card" to try and shut down criticism of his policies claiming the criticism is racist, so too will Clinton more and more play the "victim woman card" or the
"misogyny" card to try and shut down criticism.

Hopefully Trump will continue to call them out on it and heap ridicule upon them and keep hammering about their worthless policies and dishonesty. Whitewater, Paula Jones, the attacks on Clarence Thomas --all that dirty laundry needs to be brought out and aired to the public to show Clinton for what she is: a crooked Jezebel of a woman.

Hopefully she loses the election.

I imagine your disgust for the two of them stems mainly from the fact that they are women?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love her. I was a student of hers. She's awesome and has always just been the smartest person in the room. And good person.

She is the one that lied about being an Indian, right? Seems like a trend in the democrat party.

Really? This shit again? When your candidate has pretended to be no less than 2 other people so he could talk about his sex life openly?

Honestly, I love Sen. Warren, but it really pisses me off that she did this. It's not the gravest offense in the world (although pretty appropriative) but it's just so utterly indefensible that nobody on the right is ever going to let go of the cheap shot.

Anonymous wrote:Love, love her!

Anonymous wrote:Hillary and Warren are meeting privately this morning.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love her. I was a student of hers. She's awesome and has always just been the smartest person in the room. And good person.

She is the one that lied about being an Indian, right? Seems like a trend in the democrat party.

Really? This shit again? When your candidate has pretended to be no less than 2 other people so he could talk about his sex life openly?