Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't let it be hurtful to you, PP. Just consider the source. Not worth your time or effort.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:you have to give the maniac some credit for stealing the Republican nomination
Stealing? Via the completely undemocratic and illegitimate method of getting more votes and winning more elections?
Are you really so retarded that you think he "stole" the nomination?
I have a "retarded" child and this is quite hurtful, but I guess you don't care. I think the OP was using the word stole in the same manner as "stole the show" or "stole the limelight". Not literally "stole".
Trump doesn't worry about using the word "retarded". Every day a new word deemed inappropriate. It was not directed to your child, so do not take it personally.
Anonymous wrote:Don't let it be hurtful to you, PP. Just consider the source. Not worth your time or effort.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:you have to give the maniac some credit for stealing the Republican nomination
Stealing? Via the completely undemocratic and illegitimate method of getting more votes and winning more elections?
Are you really so retarded that you think he "stole" the nomination?
I have a "retarded" child and this is quite hurtful, but I guess you don't care. I think the OP was using the word stole in the same manner as "stole the show" or "stole the limelight". Not literally "stole".
Don't let it be hurtful to you, PP. Just consider the source. Not worth your time or effort.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:you have to give the maniac some credit for stealing the Republican nomination
Stealing? Via the completely undemocratic and illegitimate method of getting more votes and winning more elections?
Are you really so retarded that you think he "stole" the nomination?
I have a "retarded" child and this is quite hurtful, but I guess you don't care. I think the OP was using the word stole in the same manner as "stole the show" or "stole the limelight". Not literally "stole".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump's off the cuff and confrontational approach, if elected, works for his constituents and probably much of the GOP. And it works for his reality shows. However, that won't wash on the world stage. There are countries that need very little or no prompting to do physical damage to Americans at home and abroad. Trump's confrontational and threatening approach is downright dangerous.Anonymous wrote:(I am very anti trump)
Bullshit. Some people and some countries are going to come after us no matter what we do. The best way to minimize this threat is to control the border and limit the number of Muslims who come here - i.e., exactly what Trump wants to do.
How do you propose to limit the numbers of Muslims who come to America? Do you want to have religious questions for potential immigrants? Do you want to limit the numbers of immigrants from Muslim countries, which we already do? Do you realize this goes against the American ethos and values of tolerance? Do you realize that we have welcomed many of the best people from the Muslim world- their doctors, scientists, engineers, and that those people have thrived? And won't targeting and maligning America's Muslims alienate them and lead to radicalization? Shouldn't we be doing the opposite, and giving American Muslims space, because they may be the force for liberalizing Islam around the world?
Just saying!
We can close our borders if we want to or need to. Muslim countries close their borders all the time. Just try getting a visa.
Which Muslim countries are you talking about? And why would you want to emulate them if they're such horrible people? I don't understand why some Americans think that we need to act shitty because other countries do. Did you guys graduate kindergarten? And what about the religious minorities that live in Muslim countries and that may want to leave? What about Muslims living in those countries who just don't want to have any religion anymore (it's a thing!)? Tough cookies?
Trump took advantage of the demographic pickle the GOP has gotten itself into. The consultants are telling the party it needs to broaden its base and be more inclusive, the base isn't broad enough to win any more. Inclusiveness doesn't fly with the base, however. So everyone was running away from the base with an eye on the general election. Trump made a decision to win the base without regard for the consequences.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump's off the cuff and confrontational approach, if elected, works for his constituents and probably much of the GOP. And it works for his reality shows. However, that won't wash on the world stage. There are countries that need very little or no prompting to do physical damage to Americans at home and abroad. Trump's confrontational and threatening approach is downright dangerous.Anonymous wrote:(I am very anti trump)
Bullshit. Some people and some countries are going to come after us no matter what we do. The best way to minimize this threat is to control the border and limit the number of Muslims who come here - i.e., exactly what Trump wants to do.
How do you propose to limit the numbers of Muslims who come to America? Do you want to have religious questions for potential immigrants? Do you want to limit the numbers of immigrants from Muslim countries, which we already do? Do you realize this goes against the American ethos and values of tolerance? Do you realize that we have welcomed many of the best people from the Muslim world- their doctors, scientists, engineers, and that those people have thrived? And won't targeting and maligning America's Muslims alienate them and lead to radicalization? Shouldn't we be doing the opposite, and giving American Muslims space, because they may be the force for liberalizing Islam around the world?
Just saying!
We can close our borders if we want to or need to. Muslim countries close their borders all the time. Just try getting a visa.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump's off the cuff and confrontational approach, if elected, works for his constituents and probably much of the GOP. And it works for his reality shows. However, that won't wash on the world stage. There are countries that need very little or no prompting to do physical damage to Americans at home and abroad. Trump's confrontational and threatening approach is downright dangerous.Anonymous wrote:(I am very anti trump)
Bullshit. Some people and some countries are going to come after us no matter what we do. The best way to minimize this threat is to control the border and limit the number of Muslims who come here - i.e., exactly what Trump wants to do.
How do you propose to limit the numbers of Muslims who come to America? Do you want to have religious questions for potential immigrants? Do you want to limit the numbers of immigrants from Muslim countries, which we already do? Do you realize this goes against the American ethos and values of tolerance? Do you realize that we have welcomed many of the best people from the Muslim world- their doctors, scientists, engineers, and that those people have thrived? And won't targeting and maligning America's Muslims alienate them and lead to radicalization? Shouldn't we be doing the opposite, and giving American Muslims space, because they may be the force for liberalizing Islam around the world?
Just saying!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hillary's campaign is a poll driven, pandering and calculating machine.
Trump's positions are what he genuinely believes. That's why he has said so many non PC things. People like that about him.
I agree with this. I think people love that he speaks off the cuff with no filter. I think many people wish they could do that more in their own lives. Maybe not mirroring his views, but with our own opinions that may not be the most popular. People value that he says what is on his mind and wish they had the courage to do more of the same.
(I am very anti trump)
Trump's off the cuff and confrontational approach, if elected, works for his constituents and probably much of the GOP. And it works for his reality shows. However, that won't wash on the world stage. There are countries that need very little or no prompting to do physical damage to Americans at home and abroad. Trump's confrontational and threatening approach is downright dangerous.
Why? Political correctness is going to cure war and hunger?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:you have to give the maniac some credit for stealing the Republican nomination
Stealing? Via the completely undemocratic and illegitimate method of getting more votes and winning more elections?
Are you really so retarded that you think he "stole" the nomination?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hillary's campaign is a poll driven, pandering and calculating machine.
Trump's positions are what he genuinely believes. That's why he has said so many non PC things. People like that about him.
I agree with this. I think people love that he speaks off the cuff with no filter. I think many people wish they could do that more in their own lives. Maybe not mirroring his views, but with our own opinions that may not be the most popular. People value that he says what is on his mind and wish they had the courage to do more of the same.
(I am very anti trump)
Trump's off the cuff and confrontational approach, if elected, works for his constituents and probably much of the GOP. And it works for his reality shows. However, that won't wash on the world stage. There are countries that need very little or no prompting to do physical damage to Americans at home and abroad. Trump's confrontational and threatening approach is downright dangerous.