Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This will be an opportunity for Bernie to demonstrate an ability to mobilize voters for a non-presidential contest: he's now backing Tim Canova, the primary challenger to DWS. Can his movement sweep the DNC chair out of office?

That's a shame. If you knew anything about the hill, you'd know that DWS is one of the few people who actually knows what she's doing. She's very impressive and gets things done. She's typically the only impressive person in hearings...most people on the hill are duds.

Anonymous wrote:This liberal actually said on CNN that he wished someone like Priebus was the spokesperson for the DNC.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/280410-van-jones-i-wish-priebus-was-dnc-chair-over-wasserman-schultz

Anonymous wrote:Right now "movement" seems to be a movement to get Sanders elected president at any cost.

Sanders may not be the Democratic nominee, or the president of the United States, but if his supporters take the opportunity, they’ll accomplish what past insurgent candidacies couldn’t, and he’ll stand as a key figure in the origin story of a new left buy only if a Democrat takes the presidency. To win a lasting victory, the people inspired by Sanders need to do more than beat the establishment; they need to become it.

Anonymous wrote:The more I see these threads, the more excited I am to vote and campaign for Hillary. Loved how genuinely excited she was to talk to the nurses in NJ. https://www.hillaryclinton.com/feed/why-hillary-clinton-gave-clean-cookstoves-millions-women-around-world/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=fb&utm_campaign=20160520feed-cookstoves-vid

THAT is a movement

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This will be an opportunity for Bernie to demonstrate an ability to mobilize voters for a non-presidential contest: he's now backing Tim Canova, the primary challenger to DWS. Can his movement sweep the DNC chair out of office?

That's a shame. If you knew anything about the hill, you'd know that DWS is one of the few people who actually knows what she's doing. She's very impressive and gets things done. She's typically the only impressive person in hearings...most people on the hill are duds.

DWS lost all her credibility when she went in the tank for Hillary. Just to be clear, there is nothing wrong with any person choosing to back the candidate of their choice but DWS in her role heading up the DNC had to maintain neutrality. She failed abysmally and that alone is a reason to primary her.

I hate to even draw the comparison but the head of the RNC did try and stay neutral although it was obvious that Trump was not his preference. DWS could learn a thing or two from Priebus.

Time for DWS to go.

She is also a TERRIBLE spokesperson for Democrats.
I am a Republican, so I am critical of the Dems anyway, but she is really horrible.
She can’t even think on her feet fast enough to “spin” a logical response to tough questions.

Anonymous wrote:This liberal actually said on CNN that he wished someone like Priebus was the spokesperson for the DNC.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/280410-van-jones-i-wish-priebus-was-dnc-chair-over-wasserman-schultz

Anonymous wrote:If Hillary loses this election, her campaign will be remembered as the last gasp of Third Way centrism. Too many of her supporters can live with that. They need their Pfizer stock to stay high.

Anonymous wrote:If Hillary loses this election, her campaign will be remembered as the last gasp of Third Way centrism. Too many of her supporters can live with that. They need their Pfizer stock to stay high.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This will be an opportunity for Bernie to demonstrate an ability to mobilize voters for a non-presidential contest: he's now backing Tim Canova, the primary challenger to DWS. Can his movement sweep the DNC chair out of office?

That's a shame. If you knew anything about the hill, you'd know that DWS is one of the few people who actually knows what she's doing. She's very impressive and gets things done. She's typically the only impressive person in hearings...most people on the hill are duds.

DWS lost all her credibility when she went in the tank for Hillary. Just to be clear, there is nothing wrong with any person choosing to back the candidate of their choice but DWS in her role heading up the DNC had to maintain neutrality. She failed abysmally and that alone is a reason to primary her.

I hate to even draw the comparison but the head of the RNC did try and stay neutral although it was obvious that Trump was not his preference. DWS could learn a thing or two from Priebus.

Time for DWS to go.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This will be an opportunity for Bernie to demonstrate an ability to mobilize voters for a non-presidential contest: he's now backing Tim Canova, the primary challenger to DWS. Can his movement sweep the DNC chair out of office?

That's a shame. If you knew anything about the hill, you'd know that DWS is one of the few people who actually knows what she's doing. She's very impressive and gets things done. She's typically the only impressive person in hearings...most people on the hill are duds.

Anonymous wrote:You know what would be a great achievement for Bernie? To get all his followers to vote in non-presidential elections. That alone would do more than any primary challenge. That's what the Republicans do, they vote in the off years.