
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm 5'3 and 44 y.o. I crept up to 145 a few years ago, and then 2 years ago up to 150. I've had a couple spurts where I've cut out carbs and sweets (my downfall) - and got down as far as 145 (and to 147 for one year) - basically by eating only around 1250 calories a day (and I do some exercise). But then I can't keep myself going on it, and am back to 150 this week! And this is only really the difference of eating 1600-1800 calories a day vs. if I was at 140 and wanted to sustain would need to keep to 1500 average, let alone the 1250 to 'lose'. AGING SUCKS!
Have you considered intermittent fasting? I find that it is much easier to keep my total calories down by paring down to around 500 calories 3 days per week.
How can you do that? Do you not move at all? I'd feel woozy and awful - but I'm a hardcore exerciser.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm 5'3 and 44 y.o. I crept up to 145 a few years ago, and then 2 years ago up to 150. I've had a couple spurts where I've cut out carbs and sweets (my downfall) - and got down as far as 145 (and to 147 for one year) - basically by eating only around 1250 calories a day (and I do some exercise). But then I can't keep myself going on it, and am back to 150 this week! And this is only really the difference of eating 1600-1800 calories a day vs. if I was at 140 and wanted to sustain would need to keep to 1500 average, let alone the 1250 to 'lose'. AGING SUCKS!
Have you considered intermittent fasting? I find that it is much easier to keep my total calories down by paring down to around 500 calories 3 days per week.
Anonymous wrote:I'm 5'3 and 44 y.o. I crept up to 145 a few years ago, and then 2 years ago up to 150. I've had a couple spurts where I've cut out carbs and sweets (my downfall) - and got down as far as 145 (and to 147 for one year) - basically by eating only around 1250 calories a day (and I do some exercise). But then I can't keep myself going on it, and am back to 150 this week! And this is only really the difference of eating 1600-1800 calories a day vs. if I was at 140 and wanted to sustain would need to keep to 1500 average, let alone the 1250 to 'lose'. AGING SUCKS!
Anonymous wrote:I think the portion control piece is right, but it is really hard.
I am 5'7 and right now weight about 150. I would be happy at 140. I am quite active and really don't eat any junk.
But I am hungry - at lunch I want a big salad with protein and some soup. At dinner I am not anywhere close to full, eating 3-4 ounces of lean protein and a lot of veggies.
How do you ladies keep the portion sizes reasonable without being really hungry all the time?
I think the portion control piece is right, but it is really hard.
I am 5'7 and right now weight about 150. I would be happy at 140. I am quite active and really don't eat any junk.
But I am hungry - at lunch I want a big salad with protein and some soup. At dinner I am not anywhere close to full, eating 3-4 ounces of lean protein and a lot of veggies.
How do you ladies keep the portion sizes reasonable without being really hungry all the time?
Anonymous wrote:I think it can be a real (sad) eye opener for some of us as we enter our fourties how few calories we need to operate. My body needs about 1500 calories to maintain its 5'10, 177lb self. That is plenty of good healthy food, but not much margin for junk. To stick to that I have to both track my calories (I use Lose It! app) and I weigh my food often, usually things I tend to overeat, like chocolate. To lose weight I've been doing intermittent fasting, which has helped me lose 15 lbs over 15 weeks or so. Twice a week I skip breakfast and lunch, and just eat a 500 calorie dinner with my family. You get used to it.