Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:7 in April or May you mean? Yes, I've heard of this. Crazy, but I've heard of it.
My son will be 8 in May. He's in 1st grade.
We kept him in preschool an extra year & it was the best decision ever.
This just shouldn't be allowed.
Anonymous wrote:Shit. My son is taller than most of the kids in his current class and has a September birthday, so he misses the cutoff for Kindergarten where we live. Should I anticipate that people will talk about him like this when he starts school?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:7 in April or May you mean? Yes, I've heard of this. Crazy, but I've heard of it.
My son will be 8 in May. He's in 1st grade.
We kept him in preschool an extra year & it was the best decision ever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MYOB.
I disagree with this attitude. Those who put kids in Kindergarten who will be turning 7 DO affect others. I should be able to send my summer child on time without kids being THAT much older than them (unless there was good reason). Now my kid, who is following the age guidelines, is going to feel short or possibly behind in someway, when really they should be within the standard of normal. Older kids in the class also change the teachers expectations of normal, and therefore DO affect others!
It is everyone business, but especially five year old boys (or active girls) who behave in an age appropriate way for five year olds.
A bunch of seven year olds in a kindergarten classroom skews the expectations for behavior, and turns those kids behaving or misbehaving in age appropriate ways and learning at age appropriate paces into problem children or in need of remediation.
If parents hold them out to the point they are going to turn seven during the kindergarten year (the age of many second graders) then the schools need to test them for kindergarten mastery and move them into first grade.
Anonymous wrote:In my DD's kindergarten class a boy turned 7 in February, and it does not impact the class in any way. The boy is repeating K and I applaud the family for looking out for their child's best interest long-term. After all, they could have refused the recommendation and sent him to 1st, but they chose to focus on his needs. No big deal to his current (and former) classmates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MYOB.
I disagree with this attitude. Those who put kids in Kindergarten who will be turning 7 DO affect others. I should be able to send my summer child on time without kids being THAT much older than them (unless there was good reason). Now my kid, who is following the age guidelines, is going to feel short or possibly behind in someway, when really they should be within the standard of normal. Older kids in the class also change the teachers expectations of normal, and therefore DO affect others!
Anonymous wrote:In my DD's kindergarten class a boy turned 7 in February, and it does not impact the class in any way. The boy is repeating K and I applaud the family for looking out for their child's best interest long-term. After all, they could have refused the recommendation and sent him to 1st, but they chose to focus on his needs. No big deal to his current (and former) classmates.
Anonymous wrote:Shit. My son is taller than most of the kids in his current class and has a September birthday, so he misses the cutoff for Kindergarten where we live. Should I anticipate that people will talk about him like this when he starts school?
Anonymous wrote:7 in April or May you mean? Yes, I've heard of this. Crazy, but I've heard of it.
Anonymous wrote:You realize that's only one year behind the regular start. Kids who start on time turn 6 in kindergarten. And, given that you don't know anything about the kid, you can't possibly know the reason for the late start. Like others said, if you just figured this out, it's obviously not causing problems.