Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mary Cheh must not give a damn about Eaton, near where the ward 3 shelter will be located. First Eaton was ward 3's sacrificial lamb to be kicked out of Deal. Next their renovation slot has been kicked to something like 2025, leaving Eaton as the only upper NW school thst is neither renovated nor in the construction pipeline. Finally it will get an influx of at risk kids who will have the right to stay even if their parents leave the shelter, with zero thought so far on the effects on Eaton and what resources will be required to address the considerable needs of these kids. Just as the Council's mantra is to spread the homeless burden around the city, it woukd be appropriate to spread the ward 3 shelter students around several newrby scholls like Eaton, Heardt, Mann and Janney, so thst no one school has to deal with the challenges of educating a sizable block of atcrisk students.
You are aweful
Doubtful kids will continue at Eaton if their families leave the shelter since it's so far from public/affordable housing complexes. But why is the poster's suggestion to open all ward 3 schools to homeless students awful?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mary Cheh must not give a damn about Eaton, near where the ward 3 shelter will be located. First Eaton was ward 3's sacrificial lamb to be kicked out of Deal. Next their renovation slot has been kicked to something like 2025, leaving Eaton as the only upper NW school thst is neither renovated nor in the construction pipeline. Finally it will get an influx of at risk kids who will have the right to stay even if their parents leave the shelter, with zero thought so far on the effects on Eaton and what resources will be required to address the considerable needs of these kids. Just as the Council's mantra is to spread the homeless burden around the city, it woukd be appropriate to spread the ward 3 shelter students around several newrby scholls like Eaton, Heardt, Mann and Janney, so thst no one school has to deal with the challenges of educating a sizable block of atcrisk students.
You are aweful
Doubtful kids will continue at Eaton if their families leave the shelter since it's so far from public/affordable housing complexes. But why is the poster's suggestion to open all ward 3 schools to homeless students awful?
I don't get why this is awful. I'm an eaton parent and Mary Cheh doesn't give a shit about Eaton. Too many oob families for her to give a damn. There is literally nothing she could at this point that would convince me she cares less than I already think she does. Her staff is awful and condescending to Eaton concerns. She can't be bothered to ever make any sort of appearance. Not only does she not give a shit, she doesn't give a shit that it's obvious she doesn't give a shit.
I'm not an Eaton parent but live IB to another impacted school (that has continuously been screwed over even more so than Eaton) and I'm sure this factored into the location selections - which communities will make the least amount of fuss.
SE/SW? They lost the Wilson feed too. Charles Allen will not get my future vote.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mary Cheh must not give a damn about Eaton, near where the ward 3 shelter will be located. First Eaton was ward 3's sacrificial lamb to be kicked out of Deal. Next their renovation slot has been kicked to something like 2025, leaving Eaton as the only upper NW school thst is neither renovated nor in the construction pipeline. Finally it will get an influx of at risk kids who will have the right to stay even if their parents leave the shelter, with zero thought so far on the effects on Eaton and what resources will be required to address the considerable needs of these kids. Just as the Council's mantra is to spread the homeless burden around the city, it woukd be appropriate to spread the ward 3 shelter students around several newrby scholls like Eaton, Heardt, Mann and Janney, so thst no one school has to deal with the challenges of educating a sizable block of atcrisk students.
You are aweful
Doubtful kids will continue at Eaton if their families leave the shelter since it's so far from public/affordable housing complexes. But why is the poster's suggestion to open all ward 3 schools to homeless students awful?
I don't get why this is awful. I'm an eaton parent and Mary Cheh doesn't give a shit about Eaton. Too many oob families for her to give a damn. There is literally nothing she could at this point that would convince me she cares less than I already think she does. Her staff is awful and condescending to Eaton concerns. She can't be bothered to ever make any sort of appearance. Not only does she not give a shit, she doesn't give a shit that it's obvious she doesn't give a shit.
I'm not an Eaton parent but live IB to another impacted school (that has continuously been screwed over even more so than Eaton) and I'm sure this factored into the location selections - which communities will make the least amount of fuss.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mary Cheh must not give a damn about Eaton, near where the ward 3 shelter will be located. First Eaton was ward 3's sacrificial lamb to be kicked out of Deal. Next their renovation slot has been kicked to something like 2025, leaving Eaton as the only upper NW school thst is neither renovated nor in the construction pipeline. Finally it will get an influx of at risk kids who will have the right to stay even if their parents leave the shelter, with zero thought so far on the effects on Eaton and what resources will be required to address the considerable needs of these kids. Just as the Council's mantra is to spread the homeless burden around the city, it woukd be appropriate to spread the ward 3 shelter students around several newrby scholls like Eaton, Heardt, Mann and Janney, so thst no one school has to deal with the challenges of educating a sizable block of atcrisk students.
You are aweful
Doubtful kids will continue at Eaton if their families leave the shelter since it's so far from public/affordable housing complexes. But why is the poster's suggestion to open all ward 3 schools to homeless students awful?
I don't get why this is awful. I'm an eaton parent and Mary Cheh doesn't give a shit about Eaton. Too many oob families for her to give a damn. There is literally nothing she could at this point that would convince me she cares less than I already think she does. Her staff is awful and condescending to Eaton concerns. She can't be bothered to ever make any sort of appearance. Not only does she not give a shit, she doesn't give a shit that it's obvious she doesn't give a shit.
Anonymous wrote:
I don't get why this is awful. I'm an eaton parent and Mary Cheh doesn't give a shit about Eaton. Too many oob families for her to give a damn. There is literally nothing she could at this point that would convince me she cares less than I already think she does. Her staff is awful and condescending to Eaton concerns. She can't be bothered to ever make any sort of appearance. Not only does she not give a shit, she doesn't give a shit that it's obvious she doesn't give a shit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mary Cheh must not give a damn about Eaton, near where the ward 3 shelter will be located. First Eaton was ward 3's sacrificial lamb to be kicked out of Deal. Next their renovation slot has been kicked to something like 2025, leaving Eaton as the only upper NW school thst is neither renovated nor in the construction pipeline. Finally it will get an influx of at risk kids who will have the right to stay even if their parents leave the shelter, with zero thought so far on the effects on Eaton and what resources will be required to address the considerable needs of these kids. Just as the Council's mantra is to spread the homeless burden around the city, it woukd be appropriate to spread the ward 3 shelter students around several newrby scholls like Eaton, Heardt, Mann and Janney, so thst no one school has to deal with the challenges of educating a sizable block of atcrisk students.
You are aweful
Doubtful kids will continue at Eaton if their families leave the shelter since it's so far from public/affordable housing complexes. But why is the poster's suggestion to open all ward 3 schools to homeless students awful?
I don't get why this is awful. I'm an eaton parent and Mary Cheh doesn't give a shit about Eaton. Too many oob families for her to give a damn. There is literally nothing she could at this point that would convince me she cares less than I already think she does. Her staff is awful and condescending to Eaton concerns. She can't be bothered to ever make any sort of appearance. Not only does she not give a shit, she doesn't give a shit that it's obvious she doesn't give a shit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mary Cheh must not give a damn about Eaton, near where the ward 3 shelter will be located. First Eaton was ward 3's sacrificial lamb to be kicked out of Deal. Next their renovation slot has been kicked to something like 2025, leaving Eaton as the only upper NW school thst is neither renovated nor in the construction pipeline. Finally it will get an influx of at risk kids who will have the right to stay even if their parents leave the shelter, with zero thought so far on the effects on Eaton and what resources will be required to address the considerable needs of these kids. Just as the Council's mantra is to spread the homeless burden around the city, it woukd be appropriate to spread the ward 3 shelter students around several newrby scholls like Eaton, Heardt, Mann and Janney, so thst no one school has to deal with the challenges of educating a sizable block of atcrisk students.
You are aweful
Doubtful kids will continue at Eaton if their families leave the shelter since it's so far from public/affordable housing complexes. But why is the poster's suggestion to open all ward 3 schools to homeless students awful?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mary Cheh must not give a damn about Eaton, near where the ward 3 shelter will be located. First Eaton was ward 3's sacrificial lamb to be kicked out of Deal. Next their renovation slot has been kicked to something like 2025, leaving Eaton as the only upper NW school thst is neither renovated nor in the construction pipeline. Finally it will get an influx of at risk kids who will have the right to stay even if their parents leave the shelter, with zero thought so far on the effects on Eaton and what resources will be required to address the considerable needs of these kids. Just as the Council's mantra is to spread the homeless burden around the city, it woukd be appropriate to spread the ward 3 shelter students around several newrby scholls like Eaton, Heardt, Mann and Janney, so thst no one school has to deal with the challenges of educating a sizable block of atcrisk students.
You are aweful
Anonymous wrote:Mary Cheh must not give a damn about Eaton, near where the ward 3 shelter will be located. First Eaton was ward 3's sacrificial lamb to be kicked out of Deal. Next their renovation slot has been kicked to something like 2025, leaving Eaton as the only upper NW school thst is neither renovated nor in the construction pipeline. Finally it will get an influx of at risk kids who will have the right to stay even if their parents leave the shelter, with zero thought so far on the effects on Eaton and what resources will be required to address the considerable needs of these kids. Just as the Council's mantra is to spread the homeless burden around the city, it woukd be appropriate to spread the ward 3 shelter students around several newrby scholls like Eaton, Heardt, Mann and Janney, so thst no one school has to deal with the challenges of educating a sizable block of atcrisk students.
Anonymous wrote:I think the optics will help. There's a ton of middle class families itching to send their kids to Payne, and it has a great early childhood education program. I hate to admit that optics matter, but they seem to.