Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MY DC's school went in two waves based on social studies teacher. if you are so worried about child being bullied for a 2 1/2 day trip, you need to take to administration not DCUM.
No thanks. It's not full blown bullying. It's more that I have a kid who is odd man out---even within her group of friends. If a slumber party is miserable, then I suspect outdoor ed will be worse.
RE: administration - the administration and teachers can't protect kids. You are delusional if you think they can. That's why I'm trying to figure out how big a deal it is to miss outdoor ed. And I certainly can't have my kid tell people she's skipping because girls are mean to her.
Anonymous wrote:Gaithersburg MS said you could pick your student up every day and they didn't have to spend the night if you didn't want them to.
Our school was clear that you could not request that kids be put together. You could, however, request the kids be kept apart.
Anonymous wrote:
?
Friends tease each other. Have you never had three kids over? There's often an odd man out scenario...and that's typically my kid. The quiet chubby kid is often the target---even among friends. And while most girls are kind one on one, the dynamic often changes when group mentality takes over.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MY DC's school went in two waves based on social studies teacher. if you are so worried about child being bullied for a 2 1/2 day trip, you need to take to administration not DCUM.
No thanks. It's not full blown bullying. It's more that I have a kid who is odd man out---even within her group of friends. If a slumber party is miserable, then I suspect outdoor ed will be worse.
RE: administration - the administration and teachers can't protect kids. You are delusional if you think they can. That's why I'm trying to figure out how big a deal it is to miss outdoor ed. And I certainly can't have my kid tell people she's skipping because girls are mean to her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sometimes it's good for kids to be pushed past their comfort zone.
Not if they are typically the butt of jokes and one who always gets teased. I've been encouraging, but I won't force her to go.
I'm the one that posted about comfort zone. When I was in 6th grade (fcps) we did a one day trip to hemlock overlook park. My older brothers class did overnights there, but it was cut by the time it was my turn. I was thinking about that day when I posted. I was a heavy kid, poor with bad clothes. I had one friend, but we weren't paired on the bus together so I didn't see her all day. I thought I would be miserable, but I wasn't. It was really nice being outdoors all day, and we did a zip line thing that I was terrified to do, but I did anyway, and even kids that generally never talked to me cheered me on. I have such strong memories of that trip and so few memories of my day to day classroom stuff.
Obviously you know your child best, but what if she gets bunked with someone she has never met and becomes best friends? What if her counselor takes her under her wing and becomes a good mentor. You just never know how something may turn out. It's 2 nights? What's the worse that could happen?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No thanks. It's not full blown bullying. It's more that I have a kid who is odd man out---even within her group of friends. If a slumber party is miserable, then I suspect outdoor ed will be worse.
RE: administration - the administration and teachers can't protect kids. You are delusional if you think they can. That's why I'm trying to figure out how big a deal it is to miss outdoor ed. And I certainly can't have my kid tell people she's skipping because girls are mean to her.
OP, if even the children who are supposedly your child's friends make her miserable, then you have bigger worries than Outdoor Ed.
You sound just like the mean girls, pp.
You obviously don't have a quiet kid who is a bit of a loner--how nice for you!
You have to realize that your post wasn't helpful (at best) and was likely intentionally unkind.
OP's child's "friends" aren't friends; they tease OP's child and make her miserable. It's not "mean girl" to point out that this is a problem, and furthermore a bigger problem than "should I let my child skip Outdoor Ed?"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
NP here, with a 5th grader.
So is Outdoor Ed a sleep away camp?
Cool!
Do they learn how to make and put out a fire? Do a little bit of orienteering and survival skills?
Nope. 2 nights, 3 days with quasi science instruction and running through the woods. And s'mores. You pay for it, and they drag the kids outside for hours at a time even in the rain or snow.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No thanks. It's not full blown bullying. It's more that I have a kid who is odd man out---even within her group of friends. If a slumber party is miserable, then I suspect outdoor ed will be worse.
RE: administration - the administration and teachers can't protect kids. You are delusional if you think they can. That's why I'm trying to figure out how big a deal it is to miss outdoor ed. And I certainly can't have my kid tell people she's skipping because girls are mean to her.
OP, if even the children who are supposedly your child's friends make her miserable, then you have bigger worries than Outdoor Ed.
You sound just like the mean girls, pp.
You obviously don't have a quiet kid who is a bit of a loner--how nice for you!
You have to realize that your post wasn't helpful (at best) and was likely intentionally unkind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MY DC's school went in two waves based on social studies teacher. if you are so worried about child being bullied for a 2 1/2 day trip, you need to take to administration not DCUM.
Of course admin will say she'll be taken care of and they may be able to pay her special attention but it's also possible they can't or that attention doesn't help the problem. Presumably OP understands the situation and is addressing things in other ways. There are still reasons not to push the issue with outdoor ed. It's really a family decision which they may want to make without the admin's input.
Completely different issue, but my DC had problems at outdoor ed that had nothing to do with the other students and everything to do with the administration.
I'm worried about that, too.
My kid uses the bathroom frequently, and they made a big deal about how they are outside in the woods for hours at a time and will need to be escorted by an adult to the bathroom--that will embarrass my kid.
My kid doesn't like sleeping around people who snore. She's a light sleeper and it will literally keep her up all night--and lack of sleep will trigger a migraine.
Anonymous wrote:
NP here, with a 5th grader.
So is Outdoor Ed a sleep away camp?
Cool!
Do they learn how to make and put out a fire? Do a little bit of orienteering and survival skills?
Anonymous wrote:[quote=Anonymous
No thanks. It's not full blown bullying. It's more that I have a kid who is odd man out---even within her group of friends. If a slumber party is miserable, then I suspect outdoor ed will be worse.
RE: administration - the administration and teachers can't protect kids. You are delusional if you think they can. That's why I'm trying to figure out how big a deal it is to miss outdoor ed. And I certainly can't have my kid tell people she's skipping because girls are mean to her.