Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ Close your lips and don't say the part you don't like. Stand respectfully as those who do agree recite the part they agree with. It's how we function in a pluralistic society.
What's respectful is not having a pledge that represents only those citizens -- &, yes, service menbers -- who share a certain, non secular belief.
Signed,
A veteran who happens to be Christian
And if you think we could ever find a pledge that every nut case winger would be happy with, you're nuts yourself.
Which is exactly why we don't need a ridiculous pledge.
It's not "ridiculous." There are some things in the world more important than the individual's personal comfort zone -- you know, the sum is greater than the individual parts? That is the pledge to the country.
And how exactly does our country as a whole benefit by having the words "Under God" added to the original pledge? Would you shut up & accept it if your chikdren's teacher was leading then in a pledge that replaced "Under God" with "Under Allah", "Under Zeus Almighty" or "Under God, who may or may not actually exist" ?
Our country benefits when its citizens recognize and speak up for truth. "One nation under God" represents the truth of this country, as it was founded. And no, I absolutely would not tolerate any of these other examples you give, because they are not truth and in no way represent the U.S.
For one claiming to be so patriotic, your grasp of American history is sorely lacking. There is a reason why "under God" wasn't added to the pledge until the 1950s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep, my first grade DD just confirmed it for me. It's said every morning.
One nation, under God.
Actually, to be perfectly precise, it's
One nation under God.
There is no comma, thus no hesitation.
I learned that in 5th grade and still remember it to this day.
And one of the most shameful things ever done in this country. They should stick to the original pledge, which makes no reference to a deity. It's offensive.
You're welcome. Your freedom was bought and paid for by American Service Members. God goes with them into battle and back home. Yes, all God's children say it loud and proud around here. We are a very densely military and patriotic area. Welcome and ignore those among us with little faith.
And little education, I'll bet. Most highly educated people are atheists.
You are woefully mistaken. Take a look in any library at the books thoughtfully written by religious people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep, my first grade DD just confirmed it for me. It's said every morning.
One nation, under God.
Actually, to be perfectly precise, it's
One nation under God.
There is no comma, thus no hesitation.
I learned that in 5th grade and still remember it to this day.
And one of the most shameful things ever done in this country. They should stick to the original pledge, which makes no reference to a deity. It's offensive.
You're welcome. Your freedom was bought and paid for by American Service Members. God goes with them into battle and back home. Yes, all God's children say it loud and proud around here. We are a very densely military and patriotic area. Welcome and ignore those among us with little faith.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pledge sets a tone which is good in school. It reminds the students that the flag is important. Aside from that, I can say, as a teacher, that it helps to calm the kids as the day starts in school.
The original pledge would accomplish all of these things, as well, while also adhering to the fundamental American belief of separation of church & state.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep, my first grade DD just confirmed it for me. It's said every morning.
One nation, under God.
Actually, to be perfectly precise, it's
One nation under God.
There is no comma, thus no hesitation.
I learned that in 5th grade and still remember it to this day.
And one of the most shameful things ever done in this country. They should stick to the original pledge, which makes no reference to a deity. It's offensive.
You're welcome. Your freedom was bought and paid for by American Service Members. God goes with them into battle and back home. Yes, all God's children say it loud and proud around here. We are a very densely military and patriotic area. Welcome and ignore those among us with little faith.
And little education, I'll bet. Most highly educated people are atheists.
Anonymous wrote:
In Texas there is are two pledges, the national one and one to the state:
http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/txstatutes/ED/2/E/25/C/25.082
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The pledge sets a tone which is good in school. It reminds the students that the flag is important. Aside from that, I can say, as a teacher, that it helps to calm the kids as the day starts in school.
The original pledge would accomplish all of these things, as well, while also adhering to the fundamental American belief of separation of church & state.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ Close your lips and don't say the part you don't like. Stand respectfully as those who do agree recite the part they agree with. It's how we function in a pluralistic society.
What's respectful is not having a pledge that represents only those citizens -- &, yes, service menbers -- who share a certain, non secular belief.
Signed,
A veteran who happens to be Christian
And if you think we could ever find a pledge that every nut case winger would be happy with, you're nuts yourself.
Which is exactly why we don't need a ridiculous pledge.
It's not "ridiculous." There are some things in the world more important than the individual's personal comfort zone -- you know, the sum is greater than the individual parts? That is the pledge to the country.
And how exactly does our country as a whole benefit by having the words "Under God" added to the original pledge? Would you shut up & accept it if your chikdren's teacher was leading then in a pledge that replaced "Under God" with "Under Allah", "Under Zeus Almighty" or "Under God, who may or may not actually exist" ?
Our country benefits when its citizens recognize and speak up for truth. "One nation under God" represents the truth of this country, as it was founded. And no, I absolutely would not tolerate any of these other examples you give, because they are not truth and in no way represent the U.S.
Anonymous wrote:The pledge sets a tone which is good in school. It reminds the students that the flag is important. Aside from that, I can say, as a teacher, that it helps to calm the kids as the day starts in school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ Close your lips and don't say the part you don't like. Stand respectfully as those who do agree recite the part they agree with. It's how we function in a pluralistic society.
What's respectful is not having a pledge that represents only those citizens -- &, yes, service menbers -- who share a certain, non secular belief.
Signed,
A veteran who happens to be Christian
And if you think we could ever find a pledge that every nut case winger would be happy with, you're nuts yourself.
Which is exactly why we don't need a ridiculous pledge.
It's not "ridiculous." There are some things in the world more important than the individual's personal comfort zone -- you know, the sum is greater than the individual parts? That is the pledge to the country.
And how exactly does our country as a whole benefit by having the words "Under God" added to the original pledge? Would you shut up & accept it if your chikdren's teacher was leading then in a pledge that replaced "Under God" with "Under Allah", "Under Zeus Almighty" or "Under God, who may or may not actually exist" ?