Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know comparing centers to in-home daycares is like apples and oranges ... but for some perspective, at our center, if you were offered a spot now and wanted to hold it to guarantee that you'd have it in August, you'd be paying monthly tuition for that slot from now until you used it - and that fee wouldn't be applied to future tuition. So, think 6 full months of paid, but unused care/tuition. $400 seems very reasonable in comparison, especially if it gives you peace of mind that you have a safe nurturing place for your child when you need it.
It's surprising that in-home daycares don't do the same. How can they afford not to??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Every in-home center makes its own rules so I don't see what's wrong with hers. Sounds like maybe she's been burned by parents who say they will use her and then back out at the last minute. Losing a $50 deposit isn't going to hurt much but you're less likely to back out if you have $400 invested.
+1. I would try to negotiate that it gets used towards the first two weeks of daycare though....
Are you really *that* low? Shame on you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ours had a $100 deposit that supposedly gets applied to the last week but honestly, she's so wonderful that I think most people let that slide and it's used as a bonus..
So basically the provider is supposed to hold a spot for free? She's losing income while waiting for OP's kid to actually attend and regular fees kick in.
I'm the PP you're quoting - in our case, the spot wasn't opening up until a week before we needed it, so no, she wasn't losing any money (well maybe a week).
That's fine. But in a case where the spot is being held for a few months it's not reasonable to think that it will basically be held for nothing.
I'm not sure why you're trying to have some sort of argument with me?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I think many of us wish we could. The reality is there are so many more in homes to choose from then centers the parents would absolutely balk at the idea and go to somebody else. Everybody would have to be on the same page in order for this to work. Yes, it is a lot of revenue lost.
Most (even licensed) in-homes are shitty. The few good ones can change anything they want. Under the circumstances, they *should* charge anything they want. The supply does not meet the demand, not even close.
My bare minimum is no scree time. Absolutely zero.
And I'd like 100% organic everything.
Please.Trust me your center doesn't serve 100% organic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ours had a $100 deposit that supposedly gets applied to the last week but honestly, she's so wonderful that I think most people let that slide and it's used as a bonus..
So basically the provider is supposed to hold a spot for free? She's losing income while waiting for OP's kid to actually attend and regular fees kick in.
I'm the PP you're quoting - in our case, the spot wasn't opening up until a week before we needed it, so no, she wasn't losing any money (well maybe a week).
That's fine. But in a case where the spot is being held for a few months it's not reasonable to think that it will basically be held for nothing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I think many of us wish we could. The reality is there are so many more in homes to choose from then centers the parents would absolutely balk at the idea and go to somebody else. Everybody would have to be on the same page in order for this to work. Yes, it is a lot of revenue lost.
Most (even licensed) in-homes are shitty. The few good ones can change anything they want. Under the circumstances, they *should* charge anything they want. The supply does not meet the demand, not even close.
My bare minimum is no scree time. Absolutely zero.
And I'd like 100% organic everything.
Trust me your center doesn't serve 100% organic.