Anonymous wrote:He needs his butt beat. This isn't the first case I've heard like this. Some men lose their mind when they get put on child support.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He confessed he didn't want to pay child support. What a monster!! Hey men, if you don't want to support children you can wear a condom. There are ways to prevent having children. What a selfish monster.
He's probably anti-abortion, too
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Domestic violence isn't about the money...it's about control.
This was not a clear case of domestic violence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Domestic violence isn't about the money...it's about control.
This was not a clear case of domestic violence.
Anonymous wrote:He confessed he didn't want to pay child support. What a monster!! Hey men, if you don't want to support children you can wear a condom. There are ways to prevent having children. What a selfish monster.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Domestic violence isn't about the money...it's about control.
This was not a clear case of domestic violence.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sad that this thread has 6 replies and the rich white peope in NW was like 700 pages.
I have no idea how someone kills a child. He will be the lowest of the lowly cowards in jail. For $600/month. Disgusting.
That murder wasn't solved immediately, right? The suspect and motive were unclear so people were doing a lot of speculating.
In this case, we already know who did it, and why.
Not much to say now other than he should be under the jail -- and that this is yet another example of women being victimized for exercising their legal rights.
The motive is clear in this one? You sure? You 100% positive it was about the money?
Maybe it was money. Maybe she was dating someone else and he was jealous. Maybe we'll never know (but since he's admitted to it, I think we will).
Sadly, we're all too familiar with women being hurt or killed by their partners or ex-partners, which is the all-too-depressing point. Again, not much to say other than thank god he admitted it.
Exactly it could have been any number of reasons.
Right. But what I'm saying is -- this murder isn't as unusual as an entire family being taken hostage in their home and executed by some undiscovered perp. Hence there's going to be less discussion and speculation about this case.
Had this guy not already admitted it, there might be more to say.
Oh I'm not the PP questioning why this isn't being discussed more - I was just wondering why folks were so quick to jump to the conclusion that it was about the money...that dude just said, "Well 600/mth is too much so I'm going to kill them both." If that's the case then money wasn't his motivation, madness was - cause that's just plain psychotic to kill your own damn child cause you don't wanna hand over the money. Now I don't doubt the judgement played a part, but I think it was more an issue of custody not cash. Witnesses said they heard the victim arguing with a man before the shots rang out. There's nothing to argue about if the court says you gotta pay but if you don't have joint custody and want to see your child that is something I see folks argue about and eventually getting so worked up that...well...
Anonymous wrote:Domestic violence isn't about the money...it's about control.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The baby had a hyphenated last name, Davis-Green. Davis was the mothers last name but Green was not the biological fathers last name. It sounds like she thought someone else was the father initially.
The mom did and took that guy to court and a DNA test determined he wasn't the father. So she took the suspect to court and he was pronounced the father. Thank goodness he's locked up now.