Anonymous
Post 01/29/2016 20:27     Subject: Drip, drip, drip.... the Clinton email saga continues
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do you really think an email Sid Blumenthal sent would be classified? LOL.

Remember that if any of this stuff is actually classified, *anyone* sending or receiving those emails could be in trouble because they were not sent on a classified server, nor are they sitting on a classified server now.


Who said anything about Blumenthal?
It will be interesting to see WHO sent these emails.
And, how the FBI handles this situation with this person/these people.


One of the fully redacted (due to now being classified) emails is from Blumenthal. Clinton, once again, did not send any of these emails. Once again, none of the material was classified at the time.



You are listening to Clinton. We don’t know if SHE sent the emails yet. We do know that she CHOSE to have a server that was unsecured. THAT is the issue. If she had done what she was supposed to do, and used the State Dept. email, there would be no issue. This is ALL her making. And, as to the statement that the material was not classified at the time..... seems to me that what has happened here is that someone took information from classified emails (yes, classified, and likely marked as such), and related that classified information in an email to HRC. So, while the email itself was not classified, the information was. Once again, she should have known better. Her judgment is questionable, at best. But, she is a Clinton, after all, so she is not held to the same expectations of us regular people. She is above us.


Yeah, she did the same thing as her predecessor.


Come on, this is suppos to be a fact-free anti Hillary thread. We're suppose to pretend it was not a common practice in the Bush administration.
Anonymous
Post 01/29/2016 20:16     Subject: Drip, drip, drip.... the Clinton email saga continues
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do you really think an email Sid Blumenthal sent would be classified? LOL.

Remember that if any of this stuff is actually classified, *anyone* sending or receiving those emails could be in trouble because they were not sent on a classified server, nor are they sitting on a classified server now.


Who said anything about Blumenthal?
It will be interesting to see WHO sent these emails.
And, how the FBI handles this situation with this person/these people.


One of the fully redacted (due to now being classified) emails is from Blumenthal. Clinton, once again, did not send any of these emails. Once again, none of the material was classified at the time.



You are listening to Clinton. We don’t know if SHE sent the emails yet. We do know that she CHOSE to have a server that was unsecured. THAT is the issue. If she had done what she was supposed to do, and used the State Dept. email, there would be no issue. This is ALL her making. And, as to the statement that the material was not classified at the time..... seems to me that what has happened here is that someone took information from classified emails (yes, classified, and likely marked as such), and related that classified information in an email to HRC. So, while the email itself was not classified, the information was. Once again, she should have known better. Her judgment is questionable, at best. But, she is a Clinton, after all, so she is not held to the same expectations of us regular people. She is above us.


No, I'm listening to a journalist who is exceptionally well informed about this.
Anonymous
Post 01/29/2016 20:12     Subject: Drip, drip, drip.... the Clinton email saga continues
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do you really think an email Sid Blumenthal sent would be classified? LOL.

Remember that if any of this stuff is actually classified, *anyone* sending or receiving those emails could be in trouble because they were not sent on a classified server, nor are they sitting on a classified server now.


Who said anything about Blumenthal?
It will be interesting to see WHO sent these emails.
And, how the FBI handles this situation with this person/these people.


One of the fully redacted (due to now being classified) emails is from Blumenthal. Clinton, once again, did not send any of these emails. Once again, none of the material was classified at the time.



You are listening to Clinton. We don’t know if SHE sent the emails yet. We do know that she CHOSE to have a server that was unsecured. THAT is the issue. If she had done what she was supposed to do, and used the State Dept. email, there would be no issue. This is ALL her making. And, as to the statement that the material was not classified at the time..... seems to me that what has happened here is that someone took information from classified emails (yes, classified, and likely marked as such), and related that classified information in an email to HRC. So, while the email itself was not classified, the information was. Once again, she should have known better. Her judgment is questionable, at best. But, she is a Clinton, after all, so she is not held to the same expectations of us regular people. She is above us.


Yeah, she did the same thing as her predecessor.
Anonymous
Post 01/29/2016 20:08     Subject: Drip, drip, drip.... the Clinton email saga continues
Anonymous wrote:If Hilary were a male politician she would be behind bars for this. Any of the other candidates on either side would go to jail.


For what? Are you going to jail every single person who sent or received these emails? They were all sent and received on unclassified servers.
Anonymous
Post 01/29/2016 20:06     Subject: Drip, drip, drip.... the Clinton email saga continues
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do you really think an email Sid Blumenthal sent would be classified? LOL.

Remember that if any of this stuff is actually classified, *anyone* sending or receiving those emails could be in trouble because they were not sent on a classified server, nor are they sitting on a classified server now.


Who said anything about Blumenthal?
It will be interesting to see WHO sent these emails.
And, how the FBI handles this situation with this person/these people.


One of the fully redacted (due to now being classified) emails is from Blumenthal. Clinton, once again, did not send any of these emails. Once again, none of the material was classified at the time.



You are listening to Clinton. We don’t know if SHE sent the emails yet. We do know that she CHOSE to have a server that was unsecured. THAT is the issue. If she had done what she was supposed to do, and used the State Dept. email, there would be no issue. This is ALL her making. And, as to the statement that the material was not classified at the time..... seems to me that what has happened here is that someone took information from classified emails (yes, classified, and likely marked as such), and related that classified information in an email to HRC. So, while the email itself was not classified, the information was. Once again, she should have known better. Her judgment is questionable, at best. But, she is a Clinton, after all, so she is not held to the same expectations of us regular people. She is above us.
Anonymous
Post 01/29/2016 20:01     Subject: Drip, drip, drip.... the Clinton email saga continues
If Hilary were a male politician she would be behind bars for this. Any of the other candidates on either side would go to jail.
Anonymous
Post 01/29/2016 20:00     Subject: Drip, drip, drip.... the Clinton email saga continues
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do you really think an email Sid Blumenthal sent would be classified? LOL.

Remember that if any of this stuff is actually classified, *anyone* sending or receiving those emails could be in trouble because they were not sent on a classified server, nor are they sitting on a classified server now.


Who said anything about Blumenthal?
It will be interesting to see WHO sent these emails.
And, how the FBI handles this situation with this person/these people.


One of the fully redacted (due to now being classified) emails is from Blumenthal. Clinton, once again, did not send any of these emails. Once again, none of the material was classified at the time.

takoma
Post 01/29/2016 19:59     Subject: Re:Drip, drip, drip.... the Clinton email saga continues
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
I am a liberal and I think this is funny!

+1. I nearly busted my liberal gut laughing.
Anonymous
Post 01/29/2016 19:55     Subject: Re:Drip, drip, drip.... the Clinton email saga continues
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Remember The Boy Who Cried Wolf?

Same scenario. Republicans are always investigating the Clintons about something. It's endless. And it's all about stuff that doesn't matter.



It is an FBI investigation, not a 'Republican' investigation.


yeah, right.
Anonymous
Post 01/29/2016 19:55     Subject: Drip, drip, drip.... the Clinton email saga continues
Anonymous wrote:Do you really think an email Sid Blumenthal sent would be classified? LOL.

Remember that if any of this stuff is actually classified, *anyone* sending or receiving those emails could be in trouble because they were not sent on a classified server, nor are they sitting on a classified server now.


Who said anything about Blumenthal?
It will be interesting to see WHO sent these emails.
And, how the FBI handles this situation with this person/these people.
Anonymous
Post 01/29/2016 19:51     Subject: Drip, drip, drip.... the Clinton email saga continues
Do you really think an email Sid Blumenthal sent would be classified? LOL.

Remember that if any of this stuff is actually classified, *anyone* sending or receiving those emails could be in trouble because they were not sent on a classified server, nor are they sitting on a classified server now.
Anonymous
Post 01/29/2016 19:46     Subject: Drip, drip, drip.... the Clinton email saga continues
Anonymous wrote:It must be rough to have no idea that everything you say is very stupid.


Hey, that condition is prevalent among at least half of DCUM posters.

And the sad news is that stupidity if often tougher on the aware reader than on the unaware writer
Anonymous
Post 01/29/2016 19:43     Subject: Drip, drip, drip.... the Clinton email saga continues
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Let's bet. If Hillary Clinton is indicted by the federal government anytime in 2016, I will never ever post in the DCUM politics forum again. If she isn't indicted by year end 2016, all you yappers will never post n the politics forum ever again. Do we have a bet? Or are you all talk?


Oh, you again. I do believe you may have a gambling problem.
I am not going to take your bet because an indictment is dependent on Obama and the Justice Dept. I have no faith they will do what is right.
I do believe the FBI will issue a recommendation, but that will also likely be “sealed” by the administration. You know, this administration that is the most transparent ever.



+1
Anonymous
Post 01/29/2016 19:42     Subject: Drip, drip, drip.... the Clinton email saga continues
It must be rough to have no idea that everything you say is very stupid.
Anonymous
Post 01/29/2016 19:42     Subject: Drip, drip, drip.... the Clinton email saga continues
I am 19:16 so not a Hillary fan but I agree that she will not be indicted. More info will come out, she will look bad and the election will go on. Many will question her judgement and doubt her commitment to following rules and laws that are inconvenient for her but she won't be indicted. Sorry to say. Hopefully this will cost her votes but she is not going to the joint.