Anonymous wrote:
or, OP, there are a lot of lazy parents who don't want to teach their kids and justify it with all kinds of non-sense. If your child is in that window to learn to read, teach them. It makes K. so much easier going in knowing the basics. A good parent teaches their kids and doesn't wait for someone else.
We did flash cards, basic step readers, videos, iPad apps.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I wish I was a good enough teacher to do it myself, but I don't know if I am. And I struggle with patience with my very determined but willful daughter. Also my time and energy is limited. My husband mentioned one of his colleagues suggested Kumon, and we have a center nearby, so I thought I'd find more information about it here. I didn't expect to get such backlash for it!
The general belief on DCUM is:
1. No child less than kindergarten age is ready to learn to read (and many children of kindergarten age are also not ready to learn to read).
2. If a child less than kindergarten age were ready to learn to read, that child would teach itself.
3. The only reason anybody would want to teach a child of less than kindergarten age to learn to read is to brag and hothouse.
So yes, backlash.
Seriously, take a look at Teach Your Child To Read In 100 Easy Lessons. It's funny-looking, and not all of the 100 lessons are easy, but you can break it up into very small bits, and the lessons are scripted, so if you don't trust your teaching skills, you can just follow the script. (My personal recommendation for a child who is not yet 4 is to skip the parts about writing letters, if that part is a struggle.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I wish I was a good enough teacher to do it myself, but I don't know if I am. And I struggle with patience with my very determined but willful daughter. Also my time and energy is limited. My husband mentioned one of his colleagues suggested Kumon, and we have a center nearby, so I thought I'd find more information about it here. I didn't expect to get such backlash for it!
The general belief on DCUM is:
1. No child less than kindergarten age is ready to learn to read (and many children of kindergarten age are also not ready to learn to read).
2. If a child less than kindergarten age were ready to learn to read, that child would teach itself.
3. The only reason anybody would want to teach a child of less than kindergarten age to learn to read is to brag and hothouse.
So yes, backlash.
Seriously, take a look at Teach Your Child To Read In 100 Easy Lessons. It's funny-looking, and not all of the 100 lessons are easy, but you can break it up into very small bits, and the lessons are scripted, so if you don't trust your teaching skills, you can just follow the script. (My personal recommendation for a child who is not yet 4 is to skip the parts about writing letters, if that part is a struggle.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't believe how many are taking this seriously. Of course not. Wtf?
Q: My daughter, who is almost 4, really wants to learn to play piano and spends hours and hours "playing" piano. Should I get her lessons?
A: No, of course not. Just keep providing an enriched environment with plenty of piano music, and she'll learn to play piano eventually on her own.
No one is suggesting the OP "just provide an enriched environment". They are suggesting that she just provide an enriched environment now, so that when she is ready to benefit from structured learning in Kindergarten she moves quickly and confidently.
Q: My daughter, who is almost 4, really wants to learn to play piano and spends hours and hours "playing" piano. Should I get her lessons?
A: No, of course not. Just keep providing an enriched environment with plenty of piano music. If she doesn't learn to play by herself now, she should wait until she gets lessons a few years from now.
At 3, a child is the age to start Suzuki lessons if she's interested in piano. In Suzuki method, the parent is very involved in the lessons and practicing at home. OP has already indicated that she has no desire to teach her daughter anything, so Suzuki method for piano wouldn't work for her. Nor would teaching her DD reading, or letter sounds as pre-reading, work for them, as a method of learning to read with lots of parent participation.
Anonymous wrote:
I wish I was a good enough teacher to do it myself, but I don't know if I am. And I struggle with patience with my very determined but willful daughter. Also my time and energy is limited. My husband mentioned one of his colleagues suggested Kumon, and we have a center nearby, so I thought I'd find more information about it here. I didn't expect to get such backlash for it!
Anonymous wrote:Don't do it OP. Let her learn on her own time in the usual way. She i off to a great start - -seriously. At this point all yo can do is mess up a good thing by pushing it in the wrong way. Let it be.
The piano analog is totally off, btw.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't believe how many are taking this seriously. Of course not. Wtf?
Q: My daughter, who is almost 4, really wants to learn to play piano and spends hours and hours "playing" piano. Should I get her lessons?
A: No, of course not. Just keep providing an enriched environment with plenty of piano music, and she'll learn to play piano eventually on her own.
No one is suggesting the OP "just provide an enriched environment". They are suggesting that she just provide an enriched environment now, so that when she is ready to benefit from structured learning in Kindergarten she moves quickly and confidently.
Q: My daughter, who is almost 4, really wants to learn to play piano and spends hours and hours "playing" piano. Should I get her lessons?
A: No, of course not. Just keep providing an enriched environment with plenty of piano music. If she doesn't learn to play by herself now, she should wait until she gets lessons a few years from now.
Anonymous wrote:OP, you're getting very defensive in this thread.