Anonymous wrote:Whomever said that Kylie is prettier than Kendall is out of their mind.
She is the least attractive of them all which is why she went and bought herself a new face in the past couple of years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not very.
She is the prettiest Kardashian sister. But I don't admire her type of beauty or her body, and I don't think she's pretty at all compared to many other celebrity women.
I don't admire her pear-shaped body, and her eyes are set very close together, giving her an unintelligent air. She has a coarse, common sort of beauty that can be seen regularly in any mall. I prefer to look at celebrities with rare, ethereal beauty, not the big-bottomed, rat-faced mall-girl appeal I can see in daily life.
This is by far the funniest thing I have ever read on the internet, thank you.
Untrue, but hilarious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think she looks good for a mom with three kids. I like that she has stayed natural compared to her freakish sisters.
This. She looks like any Washingtonian.
hahhaaaahahaaahhaaaa. Washingtonian women wish!
Anonymous wrote:Not very.
She is the prettiest Kardashian sister. But I don't admire her type of beauty or her body, and I don't think she's pretty at all compared to many other celebrity women.
I don't admire her pear-shaped body, and her eyes are set very close together, giving her an unintelligent air. She has a coarse, common sort of beauty that can be seen regularly in any mall. I prefer to look at celebrities with rare, ethereal beauty, not the big-bottomed, rat-faced mall-girl appeal I can see in daily life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not very.
She is the prettiest Kardashian sister. But I don't admire her type of beauty or her body, and I don't think she's pretty at all compared to many other celebrity women.
I don't admire her pear-shaped body, and her eyes are set very close together, giving her an unintelligent air. She has a coarse, common sort of beauty that can be seen regularly in any mall. I prefer to look at celebrities with rare, ethereal beauty, not the big-bottomed, rat-faced mall-girl appeal I can see in daily life.
Oh you mean she doesn't look white and skinny?
![]()
NP here. There are many beautiful non-white celebrities: Eva Longoria, Tyra Banks, a young Vanessa Williams, Jessica Alba, Jennifer Lopez, Naya Rivera to name a few.
Kourtney Kardashian is probably about a 7/10 rated against the general populace. About a 5/10 against celebrity population. As we all know, beauty does help people get ahead, so someone who is skilled in whatever they specialize in, but also attractive will do better than someone who is only skilled, but less attractive. So celebrities as a general group tend to be more attractive than the general population. So, context truly matters when deciding how attractive a person is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not very.
She is the prettiest Kardashian sister. But I don't admire her type of beauty or her body, and I don't think she's pretty at all compared to many other celebrity women.
I don't admire her pear-shaped body, and her eyes are set very close together, giving her an unintelligent air. She has a coarse, common sort of beauty that can be seen regularly in any mall. I prefer to look at celebrities with rare, ethereal beauty, not the big-bottomed, rat-faced mall-girl appeal I can see in daily life.
She isn't a celebrity. You are confusing notoriety with fame.
no·to·ri·e·ty
noun: notoriety
the state of being famous or well known for some bad quality or deed
fa·mous
adjective: famous
known about by many people.
What bad quality or deed is Kourtney well known for exactly? I can possibly see this argument years ago for Kim who started out with the sex tape. But sorry, at this point they are all famous. You might not like them, but they're famous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not very.
She is the prettiest Kardashian sister. But I don't admire her type of beauty or her body, and I don't think she's pretty at all compared to many other celebrity women.
I don't admire her pear-shaped body, and her eyes are set very close together, giving her an unintelligent air. She has a coarse, common sort of beauty that can be seen regularly in any mall. I prefer to look at celebrities with rare, ethereal beauty, not the big-bottomed, rat-faced mall-girl appeal I can see in daily life.
Oh FFS - I'm not a Kardashian fan, but I would kill for a body like this after three children!
Anonymous wrote:Not very.
She is the prettiest Kardashian sister. But I don't admire her type of beauty or her body, and I don't think she's pretty at all compared to many other celebrity women.
I don't admire her pear-shaped body, and her eyes are set very close together, giving her an unintelligent air. She has a coarse, common sort of beauty that can be seen regularly in any mall. I prefer to look at celebrities with rare, ethereal beauty, not the big-bottomed, rat-faced mall-girl appeal I can see in daily life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think she looks good for a mom with three kids. I like that she has stayed natural compared to her freakish sisters.
This. She looks like any Washingtonian.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not very.
She is the prettiest Kardashian sister. But I don't admire her type of beauty or her body, and I don't think she's pretty at all compared to many other celebrity women.
I don't admire her pear-shaped body, and her eyes are set very close together, giving her an unintelligent air. She has a coarse, common sort of beauty that can be seen regularly in any mall. I prefer to look at celebrities with rare, ethereal beauty, not the big-bottomed, rat-faced mall-girl appeal I can see in daily life.
Oh you mean she doesn't look white and skinny?
![]()