Anonymous wrote:I have two kids at McLean. For one kid, it's a perfect fit. They just needed a smaller learning environment and a little individualized instruction to get the boost they needed and build confidence. My other kid has a mild learning disability and needs more support, one on one and a bit more structure. In the beginning grades of middle school (5th and 6th), it's great. But, by 7th and 8th, there really is no support or strategies. It's almost like the rug is pulled from under kids who still need some support. I also believe the new head is trying to get away from McLean being a school that helps kids with mild to moderate learning differences to really a mainstream school with smaller classes. The middle school learning specialist is pretty worthless, basically a conduit for outside tutors and support, which makes you wonder why your child is at McLean if you need outside tutors on top of the $37K price tag. So, visit and ask a lot of questions before you sign the contract.
Anonymous wrote:Middle school is McLean's largest program. It thins out significantly in high school. A lot of families leave for other high schools as we probably will too. As PP said, socially limiting, blah blah academics and an abysmal athletics department. The new athletic director came from Stone Ridge but he's done absolutely nothing to build the athletic program.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the small class sizes and dedicated teachers are really the biggest value added at McLean - not so much on strategies or cutting edge thinking, but just a lot of time and attention which makes sure none of the kids can "hide" if they're not doing well. That works really well with kids who have no or minor LDs, so OP should definitely consider.
We are unhappy at McLean and I would still completely agree with this.
Anonymous wrote:I went there 30 years ago and had mild LD. Graduated law school with honors and now am the most senior lawyer at my company.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We knew a family that placed a child at McLean because other schools thought she was too young for the grade the parents wanted her to be in, and McLean seemed willing to accommodate them. She had no LD that I know of. I do not know how that has worked out for them.
They spent $35K just so their child could go to school in the grade the parents wanted her to be in?
So? It won't be the first time that's happened. I did it for my kid (different school).
DC is in lower school and it's socially too small an environment. Not enough strong peer models.Anonymous wrote:For middle school, it's ok but the high school is very limiting socially and for athletic kids.
Anonymous wrote:I agree with the prior post but, in particular -- "McLean - not so much on strategies or cutting edge thinking". There really aren't any. So, if your child does not have LDs and you just want a small learning environment and attention they would not get at a larger public or traditional private, it would likely be a good fit.
Anonymous wrote:the small class sizes and dedicated teachers are really the biggest value added at McLean - not so much on strategies or cutting edge thinking, but just a lot of time and attention which makes sure none of the kids can "hide" if they're not doing well. That works really well with kids who have no or minor LDs, so OP should definitely consider.