Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The simple reason, it's against a majority of christian values. It's a moral crime which are almost always religious based. Similar to sodomy laws which not long ago were still the law of the land in many states.
It is not against Jewish or Islamic values. Middle eastern Jews were practicing polygamy up until the 1940s and European Jews were practicing it until the year 1000AD.
It is not just Christians who have a say.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It won't be for long. there is no legal basis for saying the old right to "one man one woman" marriage also includes "two men" but not "one man, two women," etc. Anti polygamy laws will be struck down on constitutional grounds soon enough.
Disagree. Who decides whether to pull the plug if you are on life support?
If there's multiple husbands, who is assumed to be the father?
If one party exits the polygamous marriage after a few years, how do you allocate his/her portion of the marital property?
Nope, marriage is a legal construct between two individuals. We don't care about what's in their pants. But we do have to limit it to two parties.
Want more than that, start a corporation. Then you'll all be one person!!!
If marriage is just a legal construct, then why should it be limited to two parties? We've already dispensed with the traditional definition, so limiting marriage to two people is just as arbitrary as limiting marriage to a man and woman.
Face it, the gay marriage crowd rendered the word marriage essentially meaningless and opened the door to legalized polygamy. It's funny to watch them run away from it. Shouldn't "love win"?
The traditional definition is gone. I have always wanted to marry my brother, or maybe my father. No arguments to be had with the difficulties of multiple claims to property there. We are consenting adults and we should have all the rights that other married couples have.
Anonymous wrote:The simple reason, it's against a majority of christian values. It's a moral crime which are almost always religious based. Similar to sodomy laws which not long ago were still the law of the land in many states.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It won't be for long. there is no legal basis for saying the old right to "one man one woman" marriage also includes "two men" but not "one man, two women," etc. Anti polygamy laws will be struck down on constitutional grounds soon enough.
Disagree. Who decides whether to pull the plug if you are on life support?
If there's multiple husbands, who is assumed to be the father?
If one party exits the polygamous marriage after a few years, how do you allocate his/her portion of the marital property?
Nope, marriage is a legal construct between two individuals. We don't care about what's in their pants. But we do have to limit it to two parties.
Want more than that, start a corporation. Then you'll all be one person!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It won't be for long. there is no legal basis for saying the old right to "one man one woman" marriage also includes "two men" but not "one man, two women," etc. Anti polygamy laws will be struck down on constitutional grounds soon enough.
Disagree. Who decides whether to pull the plug if you are on life support?
If there's multiple husbands, who is assumed to be the father?
If one party exits the polygamous marriage after a few years, how do you allocate his/her portion of the marital property?
Nope, marriage is a legal construct between two individuals. We don't care about what's in their pants. But we do have to limit it to two parties.
Want more than that, start a corporation. Then you'll all be one person!!!
Actually, the sharia law has covered the property/custody issues pretty well, except for the pulling the plug thing. It's one thing to disagree personally with polygamy, but it's incorrect to say that property/inheritance issues can't be sorted out in this context, because they can.
Again, I'm not bringing this up as an example of how things ought to be done, but as how they CAN be done.
Multiple wives and inheritance are covered by sharia law, and I suppose it works okay if a woman is prohibited from working. And if she is properly supported by her family.
http://www.islamicislamic.com/inheritance.htm
In this country, where women do work, we would not import sharia law unchanged (not what we would do in any case).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The main prob,em with polygamy is that many women would flock to successful and desirable and then many men would be stuck alone and they would become social degenerates or just check out from society.
You've got it, PP. Without monogamy, we losers would find it hard to marry and have kids.
Anonymous wrote:The main prob,em with polygamy is that many women would flock to successful and desirable and then many men would be stuck alone and they would become social degenerates or just check out from society.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It won't be for long. there is no legal basis for saying the old right to "one man one woman" marriage also includes "two men" but not "one man, two women," etc. Anti polygamy laws will be struck down on constitutional grounds soon enough.
Disagree. Who decides whether to pull the plug if you are on life support?
If there's multiple husbands, who is assumed to be the father?
If one party exits the polygamous marriage after a few years, how do you allocate his/her portion of the marital property?
Nope, marriage is a legal construct between two individuals. We don't care about what's in their pants. But we do have to limit it to two parties.
Want more than that, start a corporation. Then you'll all be one person!!!
Anonymous wrote:OP here, but how is it prosecuted? Only one woman is legally married.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It won't be for long. there is no legal basis for saying the old right to "one man one woman" marriage also includes "two men" but not "one man, two women," etc. Anti polygamy laws will be struck down on constitutional grounds soon enough.
Disagree. Who decides whether to pull the plug if you are on life support?
If there's multiple husbands, who is assumed to be the father?
If one party exits the polygamous marriage after a few years, how do you allocate his/her portion of the marital property?
Nope, marriage is a legal construct between two individuals. We don't care about what's in their pants. But we do have to limit it to two parties.
Want more than that, start a corporation. Then you'll all be one person!!!
Actually, the sharia law has covered the property/custody issues pretty well, except for the pulling the plug thing. It's one thing to disagree personally with polygamy, but it's incorrect to say that property/inheritance issues can't be sorted out in this context, because they can.
Again, I'm not bringing this up as an example of how things ought to be done, but as how they CAN be done.