Anonymous wrote:You are not entitled to your parents' money.
You are not entitled to your parents' money.
You are not entitled to your parents' money.
Repeat until it sinks in.
And the fact that someone with a HHI of $400k is whining for handouts is just gross.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hahahahahha. OP, your HHI is 400k. What in the world do you have to whine about here? It sounds like your sister had a rough start to life and has struggled to get to where she's at. You should be grateful that you're wealthy and will probably never struggle to pay for a home, unlike the vast majority of people in the world. I hope you're embarrassed.
Nobody is whining. I am trying to figure out what community expectations are about parents making big gifts to children. If I had a millionaire kid and a broke kid, I would treat them the same. Probably would help the broke kid more in life but then even things out in the will. I am not embarrassed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not unfair. Do you know how hard a person has to work to overcome a drug addiction? You make more than two times what she does. You CHOSE to have children. She did not chose to have a drug addiction. She is doing the best she can. You are doing the best you can. The best you can do gets you MUCH farther than the best she can do gets her.
I would bet my $40k salary that if i looked at your budget you are spending money you could be saving for that down payment on wants rather than on needs.
Funny how people read into things what they want to believe. There was no addiction. There was a lifestyle choice to do drugs and not have a serious job. She was not doing the best she could. Even now she is not. The issue isn't whether I am good with money. It's whether it's fair to give big handouts to one kid and not the other. Sis doesn't really need the money anyway, she just gets a nicer house this way.
You clearly, despite your education, are ignorant about drug use and the reasons behind it and the lifestyle that goes along with it.
Anonymous wrote:My sis and I are on different paths. She coasted for a while after college, worked for years at a movie theater, lived at home for free or nearly free, etc. Substantial drug use. But she now has an office gig making around 50k. She is 30, engaged to a guy making around 70k, and they live together. They are trying to buy a home, and apparently she is getting a big assist with her down payment from mom. I think 50k. She has gone from shopping for homes around $350k to $500k.
I am mid 30s, a lawyer in biglaw. married to a lawyer working part time at a small firm. HHI around 400k. We are semi-frugal but have kids to support, high child care expenses, etc. We are doing well. But, we are looking to move to a top school district in 2017 and don't have enough cash for a down payment yet.
I asked mom if she was going to match her gift to my sis with one to me, and she said no. I know my financial picture is better than my sis's, but that's because I put myself through law school, work harder, have been more responsible. Anyway, I just don't think it's right for a parent to make such a big gift to just one child. She wouldn't get my sis nice Xmas gifts and me crappy gifts or no gifts. She wouldn't leave my sis 60% of her estate and me 40%.
So, is this fair or unfair? (For the record, I would never have asked for help, just wondered if I could expect something). Would you subsidize your own kids unevenly like this?
Anonymous wrote:Fair is not always equal. Fair is not always equal. Fair is not always equal.
Someday you may understand. For now, it's not your call. Just try to be thankful for what you have.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Def unfair. She's rewarding someone for being less motivated. If your sis was desperate bc of a temp situation I'd get it since you are doing great. Otherwise this is favoritism.
Unmotivated?
People who do not earn megabucks, who have addiction issues, are UNMOTIVATED???
I think I just threw up.