Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Since we haven't had a draft in 40 years - doubt we'd start now. But, yes, theoretically, there is no reason why girls shouldn't sign up for selective service. Although perhaps the child-bearing aspect of sending young girls off to fight and then not having anyone home to continue the species - but then I read WAY to many dystopic/sci-fi books.
Don’t quite understand your thinking. It takes two to continue the species - female AND male.
One man can impregnate hundreds. One woman can only have a small number of children.
Women have to have some skin in the game. Why should women be allowed to vote on sending just the men to fight and die?
By this token we should have a draft since about 95% of our current populace votes on this issue because they assume our "voluntary" military will fight the battle for them and thus they have no skin in the game.
Everyone that pays taxes has skin in the game. How do you think those "voluntary" military members get paid, trained, housed, fed, and equipped?
Anonymous wrote:I agree with the idea of a two year service for all young people (age 18).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Since we haven't had a draft in 40 years - doubt we'd start now. But, yes, theoretically, there is no reason why girls shouldn't sign up for selective service. Although perhaps the child-bearing aspect of sending young girls off to fight and then not having anyone home to continue the species - but then I read WAY to many dystopic/sci-fi books.
Don’t quite understand your thinking. It takes two to continue the species - female AND male.
One man can impregnate hundreds. One woman can only have a small number of children.
Women have to have some skin in the game. Why should women be allowed to vote on sending just the men to fight and die?
Anonymous wrote:Hope so and its about time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since we haven't had a draft in 40 years - doubt we'd start now. But, yes, theoretically, there is no reason why girls shouldn't sign up for selective service. Although perhaps the child-bearing aspect of sending young girls off to fight and then not having anyone home to continue the species - but then I read WAY to many dystopic/sci-fi books.
Don’t quite understand your thinking. It takes two to continue the species - female AND male.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: would love to see that screamer girl at Yale get drafted. The she will see what an unsafe space is really like.
In case you missed it the last two time - there is no draft.
Anonymous wrote: would love to see that screamer girl at Yale get drafted. The she will see what an unsafe space is really like.
Anonymous wrote:I think it's about time too. In fact, I believe in universal mandatory service. There are plenty of non-combat roles in the military. I don't think that it would make sense to draft equally into combat roles and I doubt that would ever happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hope so and its about time.
+1000
I mean, can anyone think of a reason why not??!?
Yes.I am anti-registering, male or female. I don't think anyone should have to fight some government's stupid war.
A guy I knew got out of the military because he was a conscientious objector. But he still had to register. Pretty sure the law requires it regardless of one's views on fighting the government's "stupid war."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no draft
semantics. Men must register for the selective service which would form draft rolls.