Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:These threads about ms at IT and CMI and Lee make me so hopeful. Not everyone wants a deal or a DCI. I think middle school is such a vulnerable age that I want a place where my kids are known and cared for as individuals (small school) and where learning can continue to be individuated and active and inquiry based (progressive). If any of these schools creates a solid (low tech) curriculum and has great teachers and a safe, respectful social environment, we will lottery for it in a heartbeat And there are many others like me. People who happily stayed at their EPTP neighborhood school but don't like their MS option; people who are in immersion schools but don't want DCI's focus on technology; people at CMI and ITS and Lee who aren't interested in Basis or Latin; people in good wotp schools who know their kids will be eaten alive at Deal and want a smaller school for them.
Deal gets a bad rap about its size. From every family I know at Deal, they actually don't get eaten alive. They separate the kids in such a good way it feels like a small school within a school. My DC goes to one of the above schools and we are also IB at Deal. I am happy to have the choice but wanted to chime in about Deal.
Anonymous wrote:These threads about ms at IT and CMI and Lee make me so hopeful. Not everyone wants a deal or a DCI. I think middle school is such a vulnerable age that I want a place where my kids are known and cared for as individuals (small school) and where learning can continue to be individuated and active and inquiry based (progressive). If any of these schools creates a solid (low tech) curriculum and has great teachers and a safe, respectful social environment, we will lottery for it in a heartbeat And there are many others like me. People who happily stayed at their EPTP neighborhood school but don't like their MS option; people who are in immersion schools but don't want DCI's focus on technology; people at CMI and ITS and Lee who aren't interested in Basis or Latin; people in good wotp schools who know their kids will be eaten alive at Deal and want a smaller school for them.
Anonymous wrote:These threads about ms at IT and CMI and Lee make me so hopeful. Not everyone wants a deal or a DCI. I think middle school is such a vulnerable age that I want a place where my kids are known and cared for as individuals (small school) and where learning can continue to be individuated and active and inquiry based (progressive). If any of these schools creates a solid (low tech) curriculum and has great teachers and a safe, respectful social environment, we will lottery for it in a heartbeat And there are many others like me. People who happily stayed at their EPTP neighborhood school but don't like their MS option; people who are in immersion schools but don't want DCI's focus on technology; people at CMI and ITS and Lee who aren't interested in Basis or Latin; people in good wotp schools who know their kids will be eaten alive at Deal and want a smaller school for them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, my child is not 5. My child is in one of the upper grades and has been at the school since its inception. Nice try...
So you won't be playing the lottery for fifth grade, then?
No, we will not play the lottery. Our options include Deal and private.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, my child is not 5. My child is in one of the upper grades and has been at the school since its inception. Nice try...
So you won't be playing the lottery for fifth grade, then?
Anonymous wrote:No, my child is not 5. My child is in one of the upper grades and has been at the school since its inception. Nice try...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is in a lower grade at CMI. I just toured a private school k-12 program and focused specifically on their middle school to get an idea of what would be available to me at this private that I like vs the planned CMI middle. I was pleasantly surprised to find that CMI has EVERYTHING this private had and more, with the Chinese language instruction and sensory stuff. All CMI needs to add for middle school is a science lab but nothing fancy as it is only middle school and an arts room to do ceramics and clay modeling. They have the space so this will be easy. As for the competition sports this is lacking but. Can be developed. I went to a k-8 school and it was fine. I also appreciated the diversity At CMI that you can't get at any area private. The fact is that CMI model has never been done in DC in a K-8 public model so really there is nothing upon which to base predictions. There are no schools that are public,for instance, which small class sizes like CMI so people are comparing apples to oranges.
agree. non cmi parent here but I'd consider cmi for middle. I could care less about competitive sports (and my 5 year old son can't tell the difference between baseball and basketball and football)
Anonymous wrote:My kid is in a lower grade at CMI. I just toured a private school k-12 program and focused specifically on their middle school to get an idea of what would be available to me at this private that I like vs the planned CMI middle. I was pleasantly surprised to find that CMI has EVERYTHING this private had and more, with the Chinese language instruction and sensory stuff. All CMI needs to add for middle school is a science lab but nothing fancy as it is only middle school and an arts room to do ceramics and clay modeling. They have the space so this will be easy. As for the competition sports this is lacking but. Can be developed. I went to a k-8 school and it was fine. I also appreciated the diversity At CMI that you can't get at any area private. The fact is that CMI model has never been done in DC in a K-8 public model so really there is nothing upon which to base predictions. There are no schools that are public,for instance, which small class sizes like CMI so people are comparing apples to oranges.