Anonymous wrote:So we got our meds today, and it did show up as counting against the OOP maximum. Our OOP now shows as $0. Shady Grove said after the retrieval, they will verify with Kaiser the OOP. Also, if doing Frozen. ICSI is only covered if you have two abnormal sperm samples. So for us it wasn't covered. It basically broke down like this for us.
$2300-Meds Kaiser Pharmacy (counted online towards OOP)
$2750 IVF (covered, Will be reduced to $0, since the meds counted towards the OOP of $2250 in Mid Atlantic)
$2000 ICSI (Not covered for us)
$1500 PGD Biopsy (Not covered by Kaiser)
$2000 (PGD Testing Lab fee, not paid to SG, not covered under insurance)
$1800 Cryopreservation and first year storage (Not covered by insurance)
So real out of pocket. $2250+2000+1500+2000+1800= $5300+4250= $9550
We have two FSA's so we are waiting for those to reimburse us the $5100. Which means we still owe $4450 outside the FSA.
Then we are waiting until next year to do the actual FET. Which will be $2500+ Meds. Which will be reduced down to the OOP for 2017
Do you have to do frozen? No, but when we looked at it, the success rates were higher, than Fresh. Do you have to do PGD? No, but this ensures you don't implant embroyo's that don't have a good chance of making it.
Hope this helps, it was like going through a maze to find our final costs.
Anonymous wrote:Meds come first in the process before monitoring and retrieval, which is why I asked about them specifically. But you'll see in my follow-up question that I'm really asking the same point you're making--do other parts of the infertility process count toward OOP max? Somebody in another thread had said meds count but retrieval doesn't so I wanted to hear from others who might have updated info.
I'm also wondering if there are any coverage restrictions on Kaiser? For example, Aetna has rules about FSH being below 19 and no coverage for infertility that is age-related. Does Kaiser have any similar rules/situations that could mean a person's cycle wouldn't be covered after all?
Anonymous wrote:Seems like Kaiser could be the cheapest way for feds to get IVF coverage, if all you pay is the $2500 OOP max. So what if your meds don't quite add up to $2500--does any part of the monitoring or retrieval make up the difference toward meeting the max so that the remaining costs would be free? Also, are there any coverage restrictions on Kaiser? For example, Aetna has rules about FSH being below 19 and no coverage for infertility that is age-related. Does Kaiser have any similar rules/situations that could mean a person's cycle wouldn't be covered after all?
Anonymous wrote:Seems like Kaiser could be the cheapest way for feds to get IVF coverage, if all you pay is the $2500 OOP max. So what if your meds don't quite add up to $2500--does any part of the monitoring or retrieval make up the difference toward meeting the max so that the remaining costs would be free? Also, are there any coverage restrictions on Kaiser? For example, Aetna has rules about FSH being below 19 and no coverage for infertility that is age-related. Does Kaiser have any similar rules/situations that could mean a person's cycle wouldn't be covered after all?