Anonymous
10/09/2015 10:11
Subject: Re:Pop the top vs going back
Anonymous wrote:Yep, PP because those are the only two choices. Thanks, Mr. NDI Rep.
Not an NDI rep, just someone tired of seeing these horrible houses. I'd rather see the newer ones rather than look like a 3rd world shanty town.
Anonymous
10/09/2015 07:05
Subject: Re:Pop the top vs going back
Yep, PP because those are the only two choices. Thanks, Mr. NDI Rep.
Anonymous
10/08/2015 22:37
Subject: Re:Pop the top vs going back
Addition
vs
cheap NDI?
Cheap NDI please
vs
cheap NDI?
Cheap NDI please
Anonymous
10/08/2015 20:44
Subject: Pop the top vs going back
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, those blanket proclamation is what makes the "teardown crowd" look like fools. While tearing down may be good advice in most cases, it is not universal. You appear to be ignorant of this or, worse, as if you have a vested interest in convincing people to tear down.
Because these people seem to stubbornly ignore all the variables and just screech "tear it down" like a parrot every time one of these threads come up, I just assume they work for NDI or some other developer. Or they spent a fortune tearing down and building a new house and want to reassure themselves.
No. New houses are more desirable and more livable, especially after one proceeds through months of all that is needed for a makeshift add on. But keep telling yourself that no one prefers a new house, by all means!
I think you're deliberately misunderstanding. If people can live in their house, spend 300K on an addition and be done in 6 months, they might prefer that to renting some place for a year or year and a half and paying 500K. Despite the re-sale question.
Anonymous
10/08/2015 20:12
Subject: Pop the top vs going back
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, those blanket proclamation is what makes the "teardown crowd" look like fools. While tearing down may be good advice in most cases, it is not universal. You appear to be ignorant of this or, worse, as if you have a vested interest in convincing people to tear down.
Because these people seem to stubbornly ignore all the variables and just screech "tear it down" like a parrot every time one of these threads come up, I just assume they work for NDI or some other developer. Or they spent a fortune tearing down and building a new house and want to reassure themselves.
No. New houses are more desirable and more livable, especially after one proceeds through months of all that is needed for a makeshift add on. But keep telling yourself that no one prefers a new house, by all means!
Anonymous
10/08/2015 17:53
Subject: Pop the top vs going back
Anonymous wrote:Again, those blanket proclamation is what makes the "teardown crowd" look like fools. While tearing down may be good advice in most cases, it is not universal. You appear to be ignorant of this or, worse, as if you have a vested interest in convincing people to tear down.
Because these people seem to stubbornly ignore all the variables and just screech "tear it down" like a parrot every time one of these threads come up, I just assume they work for NDI or some other developer. Or they spent a fortune tearing down and building a new house and want to reassure themselves.