Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why someone would have kids if they are just going to hand them off to someone else to raise them. What's the point?
This is my take. It's easy to say "that's what works for her family", but does it really work for her kids to have parents who work super crazy schedules. Reminds me of that Bethesda mom who was profiled last year in the Bethesda magazine.
Why have kids if you work 80hrs/wk and your husband does too?
Signed,
working mom who deliberately mommy-tracked because my kid deserves as much as I can give
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why someone would have kids if they are just going to hand them off to someone else to raise them. What's the point?
Did you feel like your dad (I assume your dad worked and mom SAH) didn't raise you?
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why someone would have kids if they are just going to hand them off to someone else to raise them. What's the point?
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand why someone would have kids if they are just going to hand them off to someone else to raise them. What's the point?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep, hoping for the best for her and her family, but all the twins I've known have come early and spent time in the NICU. I'd be interested to see how she handles life if something like this happens to her. She can't win either way, though.
Oh give it a rest to all you people portending disaster on the twin pregnancy. I went to 39 weeks with my twins, and they were both bigger at birth than my singleton. I worked full time until the last 2 weeks. Any pregnancy can have complications, but a twin pregnancy is not doomed to disaster.
I was happy to take the generous 16 weeks paid maternity leave, but if she doesn't want to, as one PP said, that's her prerogative.
Anonymous wrote:Yep, hoping for the best for her and her family, but all the twins I've known have come early and spent time in the NICU. I'd be interested to see how she handles life if something like this happens to her. She can't win either way, though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just can't get it up to care about this. Her kids will be taken care of by nannies and that's clearly what works for her and her family so whatever. She can certainly afford it.
Btw I found an article from 2013 that said that Yahoo has 8 weeks paid leave for dads and 16 for moms. So the rank and file definitely gets the benefits, but the CEO chooses not to take them, which is her prerogative.
Better than most.
Still doesn't excuse the nursery in her office and telecommuting for her only...
Get over it. I'd choose the same path if I were her.