Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really don't understand the suicides. If you go on this site presumably you don't care about your marriage THAT much, right? Maybe it's the public nature of it. Most of the people I recognized on the list are already divorced. Sad in any case.
That's the point. It isn't just destroying their marriage, it's destroying their professional and personal life as well. While cheating is horrible, it isn't illegal, and ruining people's lives over what should be a private matter seems cruel.
Anonymous wrote:I really don't understand the suicides. If you go on this site presumably you don't care about your marriage THAT much, right? Maybe it's the public nature of it. Most of the people I recognized on the list are already divorced. Sad in any case.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are two issues in this case
1. The cheating and a site that promotes it
2. The true security of a person's private information online
In my opinion, the issues are separate, mutually exclusive and warrant responses independent of each other.
I agree.
Ashley Madison sounds like they have really shoddy internet security practices - maybe some fraud issues too?
I think the government should have a fast response team to respond to these breaches. The internet, though we all give up a modicum of privacy, is policed. In Europe they are developing far stronger right to privacy laws. In this situation, I would think its in the public interest to not have this released - both for the invasion of privacy ans the chilling effect on e-commerce.
Again, what would the govt. Response be if the internet hackers of about 30 million Americans security clearances with just as personal info - if those hackers get miffed and dump it on the web..does the govt. Have the capability to respond? Have they thought that far ahead?
The reality is just about anything can be hacked as should be evident with what one would assume is secure data held by the US government that China is believed to have hacked. We only hear about it when it surfaces like has occurred with AM and some of the breaches like at Target.
There is literally nothing that can be done to stop it because even if US citizens were somehow prevented from publicizing something like the AM hack there is nothing to stop those who live in other countries from doing so and given the nature of the net, people can access it from the US.
What can the government do? Perhaps there is retribution possible against American citizens if they can be identified as hackers but those who live in other countries are really immune from action unless the host governments cooperate.
We, the U.S., have a military command that is dedicated to cyber threats against our nation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Cyber_Command
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Should have thought about that before signing up for the site. (my husband was on the site, I did not know until the list. Yes, he is a cheater) I have absolutely NO sympathy for the people on that site.
Not an issue that you know about your husband but is there a need for it to be publicized to the whole world?
She probably wouldn't have known her husband was a cheater if not for the hack.
And it is absolutely her right to know if her husband is cheating.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are two issues in this case
1. The cheating and a site that promotes it
2. The true security of a person's private information online
In my opinion, the issues are separate, mutually exclusive and warrant responses independent of each other.
I agree.
Ashley Madison sounds like they have really shoddy internet security practices - maybe some fraud issues too?
I think the government should have a fast response team to respond to these breaches. The internet, though we all give up a modicum of privacy, is policed. In Europe they are developing far stronger right to privacy laws. In this situation, I would think its in the public interest to not have this released - both for the invasion of privacy ans the chilling effect on e-commerce.
Again, what would the govt. Response be if the internet hackers of about 30 million Americans security clearances with just as personal info - if those hackers get miffed and dump it on the web..does the govt. Have the capability to respond? Have they thought that far ahead?
The reality is just about anything can be hacked as should be evident with what one would assume is secure data held by the US government that China is believed to have hacked. We only hear about it when it surfaces like has occurred with AM and some of the breaches like at Target.
There is literally nothing that can be done to stop it because even if US citizens were somehow prevented from publicizing something like the AM hack there is nothing to stop those who live in other countries from doing so and given the nature of the net, people can access it from the US.
What can the government do? Perhaps there is retribution possible against American citizens if they can be identified as hackers but those who live in other countries are really immune from action unless the host governments cooperate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are two issues in this case
1. The cheating and a site that promotes it
2. The true security of a person's private information online
In my opinion, the issues are separate, mutually exclusive and warrant responses independent of each other.
I agree.
Ashley Madison sounds like they have really shoddy internet security practices - maybe some fraud issues too?
I think the government should have a fast response team to respond to these breaches. The internet, though we all give up a modicum of privacy, is policed. In Europe they are developing far stronger right to privacy laws. In this situation, I would think its in the public interest to not have this released - both for the invasion of privacy ans the chilling effect on e-commerce.
Again, what would the govt. Response be if the internet hackers of about 30 million Americans security clearances with just as personal info - if those hackers get miffed and dump it on the web..does the govt. Have the capability to respond? Have they thought that far ahead?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are two issues in this case
1. The cheating and a site that promotes it
2. The true security of a person's private information online
In my opinion, the issues are separate, mutually exclusive and warrant responses independent of each other.
I agree.
Anonymous wrote:It is really, really sad when someone can't see any other way out of a crisis and takes their own life.
I did think after the Duggar AM leak that I would have Josh on round-the-clock supervision at this point.
Anonymous wrote:There are two issues in this case
1. The cheating and a site that promotes it
2. The true security of a person's private information online
In my opinion, the issues are separate, mutually exclusive and warrant responses independent of each other.