Anonymous wrote:It shouldn't be reassuring. K is extremely academic in this area and your child will be forced to spend a huge part of every day doing worksheets. I didn't realize this until I took a day off and volunteered for a full day one day last winter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My friends 7 year old son just started his 3rd year of kindergarten. He can read, count and is at a 1-2 grade level but he has social and rage issues. He keeps getting held back because he can't get along with others. Kindergarten is not just academic.
Wow that's really screwed up. So he will rage at kids 2 years younger than him!?
It's mostly directed at the teachers. He also just shuts down. Won't do his work, won't speak or walk, goes limp like a toddler when he is upset. If he doesn't want to do it, he won't. His school uses carpal punishment so he gets sent to the principals office and he gets hit almost daily. I personally think he is autistic, but no one else does. I wonder if he will be a 15 year old kindergartener one day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My friends 7 year old son just started his 3rd year of kindergarten. He can read, count and is at a 1-2 grade level but he has social and rage issues. He keeps getting held back because he can't get along with others. Kindergarten is not just academic.
Wow that's really screwed up. So he will rage at kids 2 years younger than him!?
Anonymous wrote:My friends 7 year old son just started his 3rd year of kindergarten. He can read, count and is at a 1-2 grade level but he has social and rage issues. He keeps getting held back because he can't get along with others. Kindergarten is not just academic.
Anonymous wrote:You underestimate one thing, and that is the diversity of the children in terms of abilities.
Some can barely hold a crayon or draw a circle, let alone identify which letter is A, while others are writing sentences and reading chapter books.
The gaps are huge and the challenge to the teachers, is huge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every year parents post about how kindergarten is too easy, their darling showflake is too advanced, it's a waste of time blah blah blah whinecakes.
Just remember in every Kindergarten class you have children with preschool experience and children with no preschool experience. You have a range of children, some who know their letters, some who don't. Some who are starting to read, some who are not.. Some who can count to 10, some who can count to 20, some who can do basic math.
It takes time for a Kindergarten teacher to sort out the different levels of knowledge so he or she can teach that child appropriately. In the mean time they are also getting everyone up to speed on how to "do" school like how to sit on a carpet, line up, raise your hand etc. It's a lot for a kid to learn.
Just because your kid is l reviewing things they already know does not mean that it's a waste of time.
Also, a 5 year old or 6 year old is rarely the most reliable narrators. It might be easiest for them to answer with things they're familiar with ("today we learned how to count!") and not cover all the new things they've learned too.
I think many of us know that, and we know that there are social benefits to K. That being said, yes it is frustrating to think that my kid who not only knew the alphabet by age 2, reads at a first grade level, and has been in childcare his whole life and therefore knows the basics of circle time, etc... has to essentially put up and shut up for large portions of his day for at least the first quarter of the school year. Yes I know it, but doesn't mean I have to like the fact that large parts of his time will be review rather than gaining knowledge.
According to our school the K teachers send home a weekly or bi-weekly update newsletter so I won't have to rely on him to tell me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think many of us know that, and we know that there are social benefits to K. That being said, yes it is frustrating to think that my kid who not only knew the alphabet by age 2, reads at a first grade level, and has been in childcare his whole life and therefore knows the basics of circle time, etc... has to essentially put up and shut up for large portions of his day for at least the first quarter of the school year. Yes I know it, but doesn't mean I have to like the fact that large parts of his time will be review rather than gaining knowledge.
For your child's sake I hope you are trolling here. What precisely is the detriment to your child having to "review" letters, numbers, basic math and reading, at the ripe old age of 5yo? Is this holding back his application to Harvard?
I'm not trolling, TBH. And I expect fully to get slammed as you and the next poster already have. Thing is, I don't think it's unreasonable to want my child to learn. Whether he ends up at Harvard or the local community college, my point is that one of the huge challenges of public school is that the teacher does need to bring all kids to the same baseline which means unfortunately that some kids have to simply tread water while they wait for classmates to catch up. In other words, some kids are learning while some are simply waiting.
Maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised and he'll be challenged, but other threads over the years have indicated that I shouldn't expect that. I'm not sure why it's unreasonable to hope that your child will be learning.
I feel the same way. My child will be 6 two weeks after starting K. He had a year of an academic preschool with most of what is being learned in K except they did a very stretched out pre-reading and writing program. My kid was reading and much more. We do supplement at home as the speed of the classes are dull. The homework was a joke and took 20 minutes where other kids struggled for an hour or two, if not more. I sent in workbooks more his level which went unused. We are doing 1st grade workbooks comfortably at home this summer. Yes, part of K. is social, but I send my kid to learn, not to play. He can play at home. My kid will be in a holding pattern for another year while his peers catch up. His teachers don't even fully realize how much he knows as he dumbs down as people get uncomfortable with it. He'll tell them I don't know when he clearly knows and they do not pick up on his cues.
Anonymous wrote:Oh my.
I admit with all my various concerns about my child starting Kindergarten - lack of academic rigor as never entered my mind. Truthfully more of the opposite. I'm hoping that they still do get plenty of time to play and do lots of play based learning. I'm wishing they still did morning snack and recess and hoping they have quiet time after lunch/afternoon recess. I also wish they had daily P.E. and lots of specials - including age-appropriate foreign language classes.
In an odd way this thread is reassuring - I'm used to hearing about how academically focused Kindergarten is these days. Hopefully there will be a nice balance. I'm confident that my child will do well with reading, writing and math but really want it to be fun along the way and to continue to foster a love of school and learning and to develop good "learning skills" for a lack of a better word.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Unfortunately we can't. Will be giving public school a shot, and see how it goes. If it's a match made in heaven for him, then public it is. If not, private is in our future.
I don't think my child is a special snowflake. I don't think your's is either. I just find it unacceptable that it's become acceptable to say simply that some kids will be stuck in review-mode for the better part of a year. I find it unacceptable that I spend my tax dollars and send my child to school expecting him to learn and am told that I'm setting the bar too high and should homeschool. Academic learning. Readin', writin', 'rithmetic. It shouldn't be okay with any of us.
I'm not saying it's the fault of the teachers. They work hard, and work with what they're given. But our system is seriously flawed and broken, and I am truly and probably naively bothered that I'm being told that my child will just have to be patient while the teacher focuses on teaching a chunk of the class the alphabet and how to sit quietly for storytime.
Let me clarify. I didn't recommend that you homeschool because you're setting the academic bar too high. I recommended that you homeschool because you don't value the part of public education that involves learning to live with other people in a society.