Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because it allows people to still contact her. She's not working; she hasn't vanished from the grid.
+1
Agree. I don't get what is obnoxious about this.
+3
I think it's worded in an adult manner.
It sounds like she is planning to go back at some point and is explaining why she is not currently employed.
+1
If I saw this on a LinkedIN profile of an applicant, even years later, I wouldn't consider them. Sounds ridiculous and self-important.
Come on, be serious. You would reject an applicant over this? Even if he or she was a great candidate? Are you actually in a position to hire people? Do you rmanagers know how emotionally you make your hiring decisions?
Anonymous wrote:I have an aquaintance who decided to quit working after having her first baby.
On LinkedIn, her profile is still active but she listed under her most recent job "Voluntary departure due to motherhood."
Guess she isn't planning on going back (which jives with what I know of her, very "being a wife and mother is everything"). Why not just deactivate your profile?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Past hiring manager here. It's totally emotional. I look at the whole package, and since it's about real people, it can't always be quantitative. I've been at family friendly companies where the motherhood thing would fly and at others where it would not. If I gave my boss an application that said anything about motherhood he would throw it in the trash. If the candidate was awesome otherwise and well above the rest of the pack, I might be charitable and ask her to delete that and resubmit before I passed it to my boss. (That would also tell her upfront that it might not be a good fit for her anyway.)
But this is linked in, not an application. PP, who I'm assuming isn't you, said they would reject this person for being "ridiculous and self-important."
Anonymous wrote:She's probably using it as a networking thing, still. Some people use it like a "Facebook Lite".
Anonymous wrote:Past hiring manager here. It's totally emotional. I look at the whole package, and since it's about real people, it can't always be quantitative. I've been at family friendly companies where the motherhood thing would fly and at others where it would not. If I gave my boss an application that said anything about motherhood he would throw it in the trash. If the candidate was awesome otherwise and well above the rest of the pack, I might be charitable and ask her to delete that and resubmit before I passed it to my boss. (That would also tell her upfront that it might not be a good fit for her anyway.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because it allows people to still contact her. She's not working; she hasn't vanished from the grid.
+1
Agree. I don't get what is obnoxious about this.
+3
I think it's worded in an adult manner.
It sounds like she is planning to go back at some point and is explaining why she is not currently employed.
+1
If I saw this on a LinkedIN profile of an applicant, even years later, I wouldn't consider them. Sounds ridiculous and self-important.
Come on, be serious. You would reject an applicant over this? Even if he or she was a great candidate? Are you actually in a position to hire people? Do you rmanagers know how emotionally you make your hiring decisions?
Anonymous wrote:Past hiring manager here. It's totally emotional. I look at the whole package, and since it's about real people, it can't always be quantitative. I've been at family friendly companies where the motherhood thing would fly and at others where it would not. If I gave my boss an application that said anything about motherhood he would throw it in the trash. If the candidate was awesome otherwise and well above the rest of the pack, I might be charitable and ask her to delete that and resubmit before I passed it to my boss. (That would also tell her upfront that it might not be a good fit for her anyway.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because it allows people to still contact her. She's not working; she hasn't vanished from the grid.
+1
Agree. I don't get what is obnoxious about this.
+3
I think it's worded in an adult manner.
It sounds like she is planning to go back at some point and is explaining why she is not currently employed.
+1
If I saw this on a LinkedIN profile of an applicant, even years later, I wouldn't consider them. Sounds ridiculous and self-important.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because it allows people to still contact her. She's not working; she hasn't vanished from the grid.
+1
Agree. I don't get what is obnoxious about this.
+3
I think it's worded in an adult manner.
It sounds like she is planning to go back at some point and is explaining why she is not currently employed.
+1
If I saw this on a LinkedIN profile of an applicant, even years later, I wouldn't consider them. Sounds ridiculous and self-important.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because it allows people to still contact her. She's not working; she hasn't vanished from the grid.
+1
Agree. I don't get what is obnoxious about this.
+3
I think it's worded in an adult manner.
It sounds like she is planning to go back at some point and is explaining why she is not currently employed.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because it allows people to still contact her. She's not working; she hasn't vanished from the grid.
+1
Agree. I don't get what is obnoxious about this.
+3
I think it's worded in an adult manner.
It sounds like she is planning to go back at some point and is explaining why she is not currently employed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a contact who lists "CEO and CFO of the Smith household" on her LI. And then lists duties, like carpool manager, lunchbox chef, nutrition quality engineer...
Op's example is much much better.
To the person who said high and mighty, I can see that a little, just like motherhood is doene higher calling and the rest of us slubs who are still working for a paycheck are missing the call. But I'm guessing I'm projecting my own issues there.
This is hilarious!
Anonymous wrote:I have a contact who lists "CEO and CFO of the Smith household" on her LI. And then lists duties, like carpool manager, lunchbox chef, nutrition quality engineer...
Op's example is much much better.
To the person who said high and mighty, I can see that a little, just like motherhood is doene higher calling and the rest of us slubs who are still working for a paycheck are missing the call. But I'm guessing I'm projecting my own issues there.