Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Besides those parents that work during the evenings, how are evenings ever such a problem? All parents face the same child care issues at home -- which is why PTAs provide child care. And even if they do not, get a sitter the same way you handle other evening events you enjoy. It seems to me you aren't looking to make the meetings more accessible to everyone, you are trying to make them easier for you and your own schedule.
Evenings are the most flexible part of the day for the vast majority of people, though of course it takes some juggling.
If the PTA doesn't have the funds for childcare and the community includes a lot of low income folks or single parents, this problem is not so simple to solve. I'm not the OP, but you are writing from an extremely privileged perspective here.
OP, I like the idea to start early - maybe even 8 or 8:15 - and see if someone can do playground or gym supervision for kids in the time before school.
Let them eat cake!
What's furstrating is the never ending sales pitch to get gentrifiers to put their kids in the local school but then it's very clear that we aren't allowed to have any opinions or advocate for change. Morning PTA meetings send a very clear message, send your kid here so we can get the numbers up but don't think we want your gentrifying opinion or input.
Wow, self-centered much? The "pitch" is to get local kids into the local schools, regardless of whether they are kids of gentrifiers. The neighborhood DCPS swould like to have steady populations who are invested in the community and are likely to stick around for the long haul. I think DCPS Central - as opposed to the schools themselves - would prefer to see fewer wholly gentrified schools a la JKLMM, Ross or Brent, etc. They would like to see a mix of kids, hence their focus at-risk set-asides. The DCUM echo chamber is not a good place to gauge DCPS strategy to increase enrollments.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Besides those parents that work during the evenings, how are evenings ever such a problem? All parents face the same child care issues at home -- which is why PTAs provide child care. And even if they do not, get a sitter the same way you handle other evening events you enjoy. It seems to me you aren't looking to make the meetings more accessible to everyone, you are trying to make them easier for you and your own schedule.
Evenings are the most flexible part of the day for the vast majority of people, though of course it takes some juggling.
If the PTA doesn't have the funds for childcare and the community includes a lot of low income folks or single parents, this problem is not so simple to solve. I'm not the OP, but you are writing from an extremely privileged perspective here.
OP, I like the idea to start early - maybe even 8 or 8:15 - and see if someone can do playground or gym supervision for kids in the time before school.
Let them eat cake!
What's furstrating is the never ending sales pitch to get gentrifiers to put their kids in the local school but then it's very clear that we aren't allowed to have any opinions or advocate for change. Morning PTA meetings send a very clear message, send your kid here so we can get the numbers up but don't think we want your gentrifying opinion or input.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Besides those parents that work during the evenings, how are evenings ever such a problem? All parents face the same child care issues at home -- which is why PTAs provide child care. And even if they do not, get a sitter the same way you handle other evening events you enjoy. It seems to me you aren't looking to make the meetings more accessible to everyone, you are trying to make them easier for you and your own schedule.
Evenings are the most flexible part of the day for the vast majority of people, though of course it takes some juggling.
If the PTA doesn't have the funds for childcare and the community includes a lot of low income folks or single parents, this problem is not so simple to solve. I'm not the OP, but you are writing from an extremely privileged perspective here.
OP, I like the idea to start early - maybe even 8 or 8:15 - and see if someone can do playground or gym supervision for kids in the time before school.
Let them eat cake!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Besides those parents that work during the evenings, how are evenings ever such a problem? All parents face the same child care issues at home -- which is why PTAs provide child care. And even if they do not, get a sitter the same way you handle other evening events you enjoy. It seems to me you aren't looking to make the meetings more accessible to everyone, you are trying to make them easier for you and your own schedule.
Evenings are the most flexible part of the day for the vast majority of people, though of course it takes some juggling.
If the PTA doesn't have the funds for childcare and the community includes a lot of low income folks or single parents, this problem is not so simple to solve. I'm not the OP, but you are writing from an extremely privileged perspective here.
OP, I like the idea to start early - maybe even 8 or 8:15 - and see if someone can do playground or gym supervision for kids in the time before school.
Let them eat cake!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Besides those parents that work during the evenings, how are evenings ever such a problem? All parents face the same child care issues at home -- which is why PTAs provide child care. And even if they do not, get a sitter the same way you handle other evening events you enjoy. It seems to me you aren't looking to make the meetings more accessible to everyone, you are trying to make them easier for you and your own schedule.
Evenings are the most flexible part of the day for the vast majority of people, though of course it takes some juggling.
If the PTA doesn't have the funds for childcare and the community includes a lot of low income folks or single parents, this problem is not so simple to solve. I'm not the OP, but you are writing from an extremely privileged perspective here.
OP, I like the idea to start early - maybe even 8 or 8:15 - and see if someone can do playground or gym supervision for kids in the time before school.
Anonymous wrote:OK, thanks everyone.
I won't actually get involved in suggested time frames for our PTA/PTO meetings ultimately, but I want to share this:
Sometimes compromises, or better still "win win" solutions require "out of the box" thinking and unusual propositions, which can appear ridiculous to some.
It seems impossible to have a large quorum of both groups of parents at any one timeframe, and the mornings and evenings seem to draw different groups that will hardly overlap. The near unanimous "evenings are best!" response is going to be hard to apply here, in a school where the parents group has been meeting in the morning for years. You also haven't quite convinced me with calling the compromise "ridiculous." The fact that the lunch time frame is inconvenient for some SAHPs and some working parents is.... only a different way of saying that it would be convenient for some SAHPs and some working parents. Which is where we're trying to go, drawing members of both communities. Also to consider is that many newcomer families chosing to send their kids to their in-bound DCPS value short commuting time, and it's very possible that they have a higher proportion than you'd think of shorter commutes and periodic telework.
Sorry if I sound a bit didactic and patronizing. I'm probably just on the defensive for having my suggestion shot down!
Anonymous wrote:Besides those parents that work during the evenings, how are evenings ever such a problem? All parents face the same child care issues at home -- which is why PTAs provide child care. And even if they do not, get a sitter the same way you handle other evening events you enjoy. It seems to me you aren't looking to make the meetings more accessible to everyone, you are trying to make them easier for you and your own schedule.
Evenings are the most flexible part of the day for the vast majority of people, though of course it takes some juggling.
Anonymous wrote:OK, thanks everyone.
I won't actually get involved in suggested time frames for our PTA/PTO meetings ultimately, but I want to share this:
Sometimes compromises, or better still "win win" solutions require "out of the box" thinking and unusual propositions, which can appear ridiculous to some.
It seems impossible to have a large quorum of both groups of parents at any one timeframe, and the mornings and evenings seem to draw different groups that will hardly overlap. The near unanimous "evenings are best!" response is going to be hard to apply here, in a school where the parents group has been meeting in the morning for years. You also haven't quite convinced me with calling the compromise "ridiculous." The fact that the lunch time frame is inconvenient for some SAHPs and some working parents is.... only a different way of saying that it would be convenient for some SAHPs and some working parents. Which is where we're trying to go, drawing members of both communities. Also to consider is that many newcomer families chosing to send their kids to their in-bound DCPS value short commuting time, and it's very possible that they have a higher proportion than you'd think of shorter commutes and periodic telework.
Sorry if I sound a bit didactic and patronizing. I'm probably just on the defensive for having my suggestion shot down!
Anonymous wrote:OK, thanks everyone.
I won't actually get involved in suggested time frames for our PTA/PTO meetings ultimately, but I want to share this:
Sometimes compromises, or better still "win win" solutions require "out of the box" thinking and unusual propositions, which can appear ridiculous to some.
It seems impossible to have a large quorum of both groups of parents at any one timeframe, and the mornings and evenings seem to draw different groups that will hardly overlap. The near unanimous "evenings are best!" response is going to be hard to apply here, in a school where the parents group has been meeting in the morning for years. You also haven't quite convinced me with calling the compromise "ridiculous." The fact that the lunch time frame is inconvenient for some SAHPs and some working parents is.... only a different way of saying that it would be convenient for some SAHPs and some working parents. Which is where we're trying to go, drawing members of both communities. Also to consider is that many newcomer families chosing to send their kids to their in-bound DCPS value short commuting time, and it's very possible that they have a higher proportion than you'd think of shorter commutes and periodic telework.
Sorry if I sound a bit didactic and patronizing. I'm probably just on the defensive for having my suggestion shot down!
Anonymous wrote:Evenings are really best, just figure out a way to provide childcare, and maybe pizzas for dinner for all.